Comments on: JFK Smoking Gun Or B-Movie Proposal?
Odd Transcript In A Box Of Oswald Memorabilia Reads Like A Conspiracy Theorist's Dream
- I know someone who met the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman on business, and he asked "Tell me whether there is any truth to all these JFK conspiracy theories?"
All the Senator said was, "Castro did it." and that was the end of the conversation. Personally, I don''t like that conspiracy theory, but I trust the guy who told me the story, and it is interesting. - Reply to this comment
- i believe this is another case that will never be 100% solved, like marilyn monroe''''s death.
Posted by jetlizhan
She''s dead too. there, solved ''em both. - Reply to this comment
- i believe this is another case that will never be 100% solved, like marilyn monroe''s death.
- Reply to this comment
- "We will do whatever it takes, for as long as it takes, to find those who killed our sailors and hold them accountable."
yahhh right
Posted by terrorislam9
Bush said the same thing about Bin laundry. Didn''t happen either did it?
When are you people going to get it through your thick skulls thea the dem''s and rep''s are just two heads of the same serpent. - Reply to this comment
The CIA/Mafia created conspiracy theories by taking out the Kennedys and having the government cover it up for them...- Reply to this comment
- On neobrians'' comment,I found out recently that sea level is actually a foot higher along the coast of Texas than it is anywhere else in the world.It''s because Texas SUX!
- Reply to this comment
- jewand,before I thank you on your post to tuck,I think you might like to read some of mine,LOL
- Reply to this comment
- You claiming the Mossad was not involved is far more ridiculous than the conclusion that they were based on the known facts.
I suppose you think Operation Susannah didn''''t really happen, either. . .
Zionists assassinated JFK to facilitate introducing nukes to the Middle East.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 08:53 AM : Feb 18, 2008
Go drink another bottle of whiskey. - Reply to this comment
- http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/206.html
- Reply to this comment
- Geez tuck,you''re right!Our institutions here in the U.S. have never attempted to,or been successful at,covering anything up!They couldn''t have possibly put out stories about Mossad,and others,to steer inquisitors down a dead end,thereby removing suspicion from themselves.Your logic is flawed,and for the umpteenth time,READ THE BOOKS!
- Reply to this comment
- Because all is done the sake of GOP gains
Yes,it`s true,everything is bigger in this land
As long as each slimy pervert extends his hand
Posted by neobrian at 09:33 AM : Feb 18, 2008
Spoken by a true ingrate bigot loser. - Reply to this comment
- Texas is Known for Snuffing " Freedom "
Greedy Oil Perverts ,..Texas is Your Home
Where corruption and phony justice is known
The place for politicians of disgrace
The oil that binds is just like paste
Somethings never change,only the names
Because all is done the sake of GOP gains
Yes,it`s true,everything is bigger in this land
As long as each slimy pervert extends his hand
- Reply to this comment
- Tuck,I won''t argue the point.It''s obvious that i can''t convince you that nukes in Israel had nothing to do with it.There were WAY more powerful people here in the U.S. that stood to benefit from his death.So Jack Ruby was a Zionist,I think it''s a side issue.Oswald proffessed to be a communist.You think the Russians had anything to do with it?The institutions I mentioned earlier that were upset with JFK is just the tip of the iceberg.Where did you find y6our info about Mossad?The internet?If so,I think you might like to discount it,since it''s coming to light that info on the internet isn''t always the best place for reference material.And,Yes,it was a day or two before the assasination that the army was told not to bother.Read the books yourself.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by Jerkeedoodle at 08:40 AM : Feb 18, 2008
I heard of something on those lines before,,not sure of its validity though. - Reply to this comment
- Sorry tuck,it''s just that your Mossad thing was so laughable,what with all that I''ve read on the subject.I apologize.I will not back down on the military security issue.I''m telling you,they were supposed to provide extra security,and they didn''t because they were told to stand down.Again,CHECK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF!
- Reply to this comment
- Slim,on the lighter side,check out a guy named Charles Harrelson,Woodys''dad.There are some people that think he was one of the "hobos" that were taken off the train,photographed,and then conveniently released.
- Reply to this comment
- Bash me all you want,tuck.Like I said,look into it if you don''t believe me.Why are you so ardently opposed to what I''m saying?Do I have an agenda?Your silly enough to believe the Mossad thing,It wouldn''t surprise me if thought I had an agenda.I''m going to ignore you now,if you don''t mind.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by Jerkeedoodle at 08:13 AM : Feb 18, 2008
I think everyone is splitting hairs, when they should be splitting fire wood.
As one poster pointed out, the military does provied a certain amount of security, also as I have pointed out as well. However,,in only certain situations, i.e. extra man power,,in war zones,, or while enroute.
However,,,the SS has sole responsiblty, for the protection of the President. - Reply to this comment
- My opinion after extensive study?I don''t think there were any shots fired from the TSBD.If there was,they didn''t hit anything.Conally was hit by a shot from the Daltex building.The first shot that hit Kennedy came from behind the fence.The fatal shot?It came from the storm drain in the curb as the limo passed.
- Reply to this comment
- slim,As i told tuck,check in to it if you don''t believe me.They were on tap to provide extra security.Adlai Stevenson had been spit on,the anti- Kennedy flyers that were passed around.The article in the paper calling Kennedy a traitor.They were to have provided extra security.They were told to stand down.
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




