Comments on: Senate Panel Rebukes Craig Over Sex Sting

Ethics Committee Says Idaho Senator Acted Improperly In Airport Men's Room Sex Sting

Add a Comment See all 82 Comments
by spoonerfineart February 14, 2008 2:35 PM EST
Come on Out Larry...
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 February 14, 2008 2:34 PM EST
The panel also said Craig should have received permission from the ethics panel before using campaign funds to pay his legal bills. Craig, who is not running for re-election, has spent more than $213,000 in campaign money for legal expense and public relations work in the wake of his arrest and conviction last summer.

Only a Republican would spend 213,000 dollars to defend himself over a $500 fine.

Yep the family value party of god at its best.
Reply to this comment
by aeasus February 14, 2008 1:49 PM EST
HEADLINES:

Senator takes blue pill while traveling..causes electile disfunction!
Reply to this comment
by aeasus February 14, 2008 1:43 PM EST
LMAO...The powerful senate has spoken.

If a senator commits a crime and plead gulity, compounded by hundreds of dollars of fraudulent use of funding they will be scoulded.

Wow! Ethics commity really made an example out of him. With such a strong deterant i''m sure all politicians will fly straight now. Yep,the checks and balance system "NOT" working as intended. S.O.S.

On a serious note..how a known unethical politition can continue to hold office is another discredit to the system.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 14, 2008 1:05 PM EST
Go here to learn about your disgusting GOPer''''s hypocrisy regarding "moral values":

http://dkosopedia.com/wiki/E
xamples_of_Republican_hypocrisy_on_moral
_values

Posted by MyIDonCBS at 08:48 PM : Feb 13, 2008


Better yet: www.armchairsubversive.com
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o February 14, 2008 1:00 PM EST
Maybe the headline should read;

Senate Panel Pukes on Craig Over S e X! LOL
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 14, 2008 12:53 PM EST
Sinc Craig cannot and will not take the hint, this letter ought to be followed up by formal procedures to strip him from his office and remove him. If the people of Idaho want to represented by a lying, hypocritical sexxxxx solicitor then they should have to go to the lengths of deliberately voting for him again--knowing what they now know--and ethics charges and a criminal investigation should be opened up on him using public money to defend his nasty little secret.
Reply to this comment
by byeneocons February 14, 2008 12:52 PM EST
I wonder why the Senate Neocons didn''t rebuke David Vitter? Is nailing a high priced hooker less of an embarassment to the Senate? Or were they just smarter than Vitter and used disposable cell phones.

BTW - Vitter rose to power by campaigning on family moral values and that he would be the best candidate because Bob Livingston had had an affair, and Bill Clinton was a dirty old man, and so David Vitter should get your vote.
Reply to this comment
by offtheback February 14, 2008 12:47 PM EST
Happy Valentine''''s Day!

Posted by singinrick

And to you good sir. Now go drink your kool-aid like a good boy.
Reply to this comment
by singingrick February 14, 2008 12:45 PM EST


Conservative Family Values Republican Senator Larry Craig has always been a dedicated husband and father. In fact, on the day of the incident, he called his loving wife and told her not to worry about making him dinner because he was just going to wolf down a couple of hot dogs at the airport.




Reply to this comment
See all 82 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: