Comments on: "March For Life" Gets Presidential Support

Bush Offers Words Of Encouragement For Anti-Abortion Protest On Anniversary Of Roe V. Wade

Add a Comment See all 41 Comments
by keithle1 January 24, 2008 9:41 AM EST
Women/girls also have to deal with "Jesus freak" pharmacists who won''t give them the "morning after" pill because Jesus/God/the Virgin Mary/angel Gabriel/ The Pope wouldn''t like it.

But that pill is exactly what they need. It makes sense. Give women the opportunity to take a pill within 24 hours of unprotected ***. Don''t sit there like the almighty judge of everyone in the world & say, "No. I''d rather you had an unwanted pregnancy & carried it to term. It''s what I want that counts not you. My religious beliefs are more important than your rights. Being Catholic/Evangelist gives me the power to tell you what to do."

You''re not going to tell me that what happens within 24 hours of unprotected *** is a "human being."
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 January 24, 2008 9:31 AM EST
Catholic Church has a lot to answer for. Is your priest, nun or the Pope going to babysit for you? Don''t we have enough unwanted children or do we need more?

Sterilize women when they visit their gynecologist. He can always say "oops" if they call him to complain.
Reply to this comment
by cocamojoe82 January 24, 2008 4:14 AM EST
The whole "controversy" about abortion should not revolve around whether or not a woman has a right to do with her body what she pleases, but, whether or not that which is aborted is human or not. If it is, indeed, a human being, as pro-lifers insist, then there can never be any justification for abortion. Because, if it is a human being, then abortion is, in fact, murder: taking the life of an innocent human being. It is never right to do wrong.
On the other hand, if that which is aborted is NOT a human being, then it doesn''t matter whether one has abortions or not, as it wouldn''t be murder. It''d be along the lines of liposuction or amputation.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 January 24, 2008 3:35 AM EST
Ny list The chuches women they must bear children
The church said no to birth control
The church said no to sexx education
Men demand a baby of the woman.
Shw carries it and he may walk after it is born
The woman is tossed in the street if she does not get an abortion.
He will say that is not mine
This one we can''t afford it..
It was never meant as birth control.
For health reasons.
LATE TERM SHOULD BE BANNED IF IT CAN LIVE OUTSIDE THE BODY.Take in account the mum to be health issues..
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 January 24, 2008 1:15 AM EST
I don''t need to go to some site that panders to yer views.. I have shared my life as a foster child with ye all that read my posts. Why bring children IN TO THE WORLD ye can''t properly care for. The church is to blame..Yes ye read right..They won''t allow birth control..sexx education..They are crazy over a new baby and they make a fuss over. While they are cute..Babies are DEMANDING 24/7. I am in my 50s..Abortion is not used as birth control. Drs need to help women who ask to be fixed be fixed so they can''t breed. Mum wanted grandbabies so bad..I told her I will not give ye what yer want..The same woman that put me on the town years ago. Lets take care of the ones now here..Every day a child is abused..a borned child...we all have to live with ourdelves good or bad..
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 24, 2008 12:32 AM EST
Gallien1...EXCELLENT POINT I agree....on your latest post.
Reply to this comment
by gallian1 January 24, 2008 12:07 AM EST
Cabrezi
"no factual basis for my opinion"???
And WHO CARES if 45 million abortions were performed? WHAT IS IT TO YOU??? No one has any right to tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her body! You are a FASCIST if you think you can! Look up the word in the dictionary! I''m tired of you idiots thinking you can dictate to people how and when they can procreate. It is none of your BUSINESS if a woman wants to terminate her pregnancy! That''s between her and HER GOD not her and YOUR GOD! Get a LIFE and stop worrying about SOMEONE ELSE''S, YOU MORON!
Reply to this comment
by cabrezi January 23, 2008 11:40 PM EST
Really? Seems more like you have no factual basis for your opinion, so you think of an unflattering name.

Case in point, a poster gives you abortions stats, with which you disagree through name-calling. Your ignorance is showing.(You can always check the AGI website as well. It''s a pro-abortion choice organization. Their research shows there were OVER 45 million legal abortions between 1973 and 2005.)

Link:
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html
Reply to this comment
by gallian1 January 23, 2008 11:16 PM EST
I just call them as I see them, cabrezi. You can do that when you have such massive intellect.
Reply to this comment
by cabrezi January 23, 2008 11:01 PM EST
gallian1

Wow. Your powers of persuasion are unmatched. Who can argue with such intellect and insight? Way to prove you point through name calling.
Reply to this comment
See all 41 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: