Comments on: Tiger Attack Could Be Fatal Blow For Zoo

San Fran Zoo, Already Under Fire, Could Lose Its License After Deadly Christmas Attack

Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by sgtrds December 30, 2007 5:37 AM EST
They were as*sholes who went to the zoo to find trouble and they found it teasing a wild animal. That makes them at the very least too genetically stupid to be allowed to live and at the worst cruel. Either way they got what they deserved. I''m glad the one is out of the gene pool and sorry the other two aren''t. Here''s hoping that at least they learned a lesson, even if it did have to come at the expense of an animal that was better and more valuable in the world then they.
Reply to this comment
by blackbug99 December 30, 2007 3:26 AM EST
A Moron teasing the cat should be a guard tasering the idiot case. Yes, tigers will be tigers, but this zoo didn''t provide the safety to the public to allow such tasering. In the end "idiot boys''" friend dies saving him. Two innocent lives were lost...The heros'' and the animal who wasn''t protected from its instinct. Four more feet of wall and we have a jerk with a big fine and a pissed off but alive natural treasure.
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 December 30, 2007 3:16 AM EST
SgtRDS,
You are a gaint as*s* hole.
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 December 30, 2007 3:14 AM EST
I have no sympathy at all for the punks or their families. None.

Posted by SgtRDS

You surely are an ***. It is clear that the San Francisco Zoo was in violation of safety code (wall was 12 feet; not 18 feet as outlined. Teenage dumb*As*ses yes, but no ways does justice call for DEATH for stupidity. Maybe, we should slap a 5 lb. steak on your head then have you test other zoo tiger security integrity around the country. You are an gaint ****ho*le.
Reply to this comment
by tigeress33-2009 December 30, 2007 3:11 AM EST
lambofgoth:

That has got to be the gayest comment I have ever read!!!!
Reply to this comment
by lambofgoth December 30, 2007 2:52 AM EST
Just to build on what that kook UserVerified rambled, I think it''s Bush''s fault. I mean, this cat was clearly a fascist. Probably seeking to destroy Al-qaida. Probably was storing weapons of mass destruction in her den. I wonder if the ''pubs had some intelligence on this tiger. She probably worked for Bin Laden. Or worse... Hillary!
Yeah... that''s it. That''s My story and I am sticking to it.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds December 30, 2007 2:51 AM EST
Tigeress33

I agree. The tiger was just being a tiger. The trouble making punks were being punks. The real victims here are the tiger and the people who might have their zoo closed. I have no sympathy at all for the punks or their families. None.
Reply to this comment
by tigeress33-2009 December 30, 2007 1:48 AM EST

I still don''t understand what you all are talking about. The "cat" killed someone...humm? Let''s think about this rationally a "tiger" attacks its prey. If this story was told in some country in Africa you all would be saying well serves that guy right for being out there where tigers prey, I think all of you have forgotten that this is a wild animal and it%u2019s the price people pay to see them caged up. I mean how would you feel if you weren''t able to roam about freely. Be glad he didn''t attack more. Unprovoked attacks, is just plain BS. To hunt is in this animals DNA. Stop persecuting the tiger for doing what he does naturally.
Reply to this comment
by offtheback December 29, 2007 11:07 PM EST
Posted by ilikecats1
Pretty sicko. Do they let you out often or did you escape?

I like cats too, in fact I am graced each day by the presence of 2 currently. I realize, however that they are animals and when we play slap or some such game I don''t cry when I bleed. Nor do I retaliate. It''s part of the game with a domestic animal. I have an IQ above tree moss and would never "play" with an animal that can and will kill me as part of the game. They don''t see the difference. GET IT?
I have grown up with domestic and wild animals, encountered bears in the woods and many other such, never been harmed. These s***bags did something that, by the rules of nature got them what is dictated by those rules. I could not have protected them, nor would I have. They made themselves cat food.
Again, good riddance cat food...
And yes I''m out quite often. Care to play?
Reply to this comment
by userverfied December 29, 2007 10:39 PM EST
This is all the Libs fault. Animal rights activists refused to destroy the cat even though it has had this kind of known history for many years.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: