Comments on: CIA: We Did Cooperate With 9/11 Commission

Agency Rebukes Suggestion It Was Not Forthcoming With Info About Interrogations

Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
by king77shaw December 22, 2007 10:07 PM EST
neither the CIA nor the 9/11 commission would like you to see these photos ... was it a collapse or controlled demolition? how did the beams get shot so far horizontally? curious ...

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw December 22, 2007 10:04 PM EST
why did the 9/11 commission completely ignore this footage ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok

WTC7 housed the CIA as well as the secret service, fbi and SEC ... hmmm, can anyone say command central?
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw December 22, 2007 10:00 PM EST
CIA tapes? why didn''t the 9/11 Commission view this footage ?

here%u2019s an independent photographer who shot close up footage of the Pentagon on 9/11 - watch it and hear what he has to say - then ask yourself %u201Cwhere%u2019s the plane?%u201D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWIT9TSJPE

more damning Pentagon evidence here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAwtmun_aj8&feature=related

and here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=869bO4jI1po&feature=related
Reply to this comment
by dustfullman December 22, 2007 9:28 PM EST
We are seeing the results of 16 years of Republican Rule. Lying and lying by omission are the true lasting legacy of The Bushies. Seig Heil!
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 December 22, 2007 8:21 PM EST
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:56 PM : Dec 22, 2007


This is where We the People need to get their hooks out of our brains, if they say it it is a lie, they have no public trust left and the public should give none. This reference is like everything else a talking point for Rush to feed the poodles it has no merit, it is a lie, a red herring a faux argument a distraction.....a masterful chaos technique to overcome and hide truth, nothing more there is no honor here%u2026..and not providing the document is a crime%u2026
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 December 22, 2007 8:13 PM EST
Nice try, just like everything else bushcorruptize go with a false literal definition without merit or like this just lie

Document:
an object containing information LAW an object such as a movie, photograph, or audio recording that contains information and can be used as evidence.


NO IMMUNITY NONE CONGRESS
Reply to this comment
by creeper00 December 22, 2007 7:47 PM EST
Did the 911 Commission conveniently forget to ask about videotapes?

Did anyone give a d@mn about the truth being told?
Reply to this comment
by vastr-wcon December 22, 2007 7:16 PM EST

.
"CIA: We Did Cooperate With 9/11 Commission"

Sure, right. Everyone that believes in Santa Clause will certain believe that one.

It''s like 1963 all over again - when the CIA stonewalled the Warren Commission and prevent it from finding out anything about the CIA''s major role in the JFK assassination.

.

Reply to this comment
by inventagod December 22, 2007 6:16 PM EST
Yeah, we are SO stupid....
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 December 22, 2007 6:14 PM EST
How can you specifically ask for videotapes when nobody knows they exist? Or is our system so corrupt that they knew about them and deliberately didn''''t ask?
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:56 PM : Dec 22, 2007



There you go!!! asked ans answered

Reply to this comment
by uzzisanta December 22, 2007 6:03 PM EST
So basically what they did was bait you guys. Yer talking about the master baiters of the world. They bait everything. They walk around all day long wearing fishing shirts.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 22, 2007 4:56 PM EST
Hogwarsh!

They deliberately held them back. What do all the legal eagles employed by the CIA not understand about providing any and all documents relating to 9/11, which should include anything to do with the testimony of the ''supposedly'' captured perpatrators. The Commission needed to know exactly how they got that testimony to even begin to make an assessment as to whether their testimony was valid.

If they weren''t ordered by the White HOuse to hold them back, why did they they? And if they destroyed them after, why even acknowledge that they ever had them? Because they knew that SOMEBODY was going to rat them out?

How can you specifically ask for videotapes when nobody knows they exist? Or is our system so corrupt that they knew about them and deliberately didn''t ask?

It is clearly starting to appear that we have fingers in Washington point every which direction. Where is one honest person that cares enough to try to untangle the web of deceit and lies of ALL those involved and see that justice is served? When does it get to the point where we can no longer just stand back and let them sweet this under the rug and make them accountable for those 3,000 lives lost on 9/11?
Reply to this comment
See all 32 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: