Comments on: Edgy New Orleans OKs Razing Public Housing
Amid Protests, Council Approves Public Housing Demolition As City Rebuilds From Katrina
- I am a land use consultant specializing in building near water. FEMA puts out maps showing the areas of the country known to be prone to flooding. I have to draw site plans with the buildings outside the flood plain.
Why should New Orleans be rebuilt in a place that will surely flood again? - Reply to this comment
- rudy,
you hit it on the head. This is not so much about white and black, but more like rich and poor. NO is so hellbent on getting NO back on the map, that they are jumping at the chance to get rid of poor and minority residents and prop the place up on rich white dollars. So what if it was your home? your''e out. They are taking the land and handing it to private developers to make a buck for themselves. The same thing is happening everywhere. Move out the homeowners and the renters and let some fat cat developer profit from the land. These a holes on this site dont get it, they do make everything white and black when the real issue is the government, federal, state and local are handing over $$ to their developer friends. Besides, its too expensive to commute from the suburbs anymore so they are taking over city centers that they have neglected and didnt give a s h i t about when there were poor people living there! - Reply to this comment
- the housing in n.o. is designed to keep the blacks who won''t work (i.e. dopers, drunks, mentally ill, ******, and unmarried mammies with 10 kids, ect.) segregated from those willing to work to better themselves.
And they still can''t control the murdering s.o.bs. so they don''t want that back... - Reply to this comment
- "Why didn''''''''t City Counsel schedule this meeting in the Superdome?
Could have accommodated every body with room to spare plus security. "--Posted by thgdriver
Maybe they didn''t want to remind the public what kind of care they provided during Katrina.
If the Darth Bushit admin is behind this move, it''s for the benefit of some corporate billionaires. Those are "Bushit''s people."
Maybe they''ll bring in Blackwater to murder some residents. - Reply to this comment
- I can''t believe the hate on this site. There are vets on this sites and frankly I am tired they are kicked in the teeth. I am not a vet. I HAVE BEEN POSTING OVER A YEAR. They raised their paw to serve. Thank them. I do. I am a daughter of a vet. My room mate is a vet. Get off this colour thing. Yer grife over this/that.There is more hate today. Why.
- Reply to this comment
- Why didn''''t City Counsel schedule this meeting in the Superdome?
Could have accommodated every body with room to spare plus security. - Reply to this comment
- My GSD needs to go for a walk
Good Evening - Reply to this comment
- Posted by tiddsanbeer at 06:57 PM : Dec 20, 2007
tiddsanbeer
Math
cost
6 beers + 2 tidds = $250 - Reply to this comment
- 1 billion dollar can build up to 20,000 social homes units in subsidized form of low cost housing project.
70 billion dollar can build up to 1,400,000 social houses. It''''s almost the total need for social housing in America.
Repukons nad right-wingers prefer spending 70 billion over war, destruction, not construction. And they sell-call Christians... What a shame!
Posted by grazinggoat at 06:51 PM : Dec 20, 2007
Bush Admin math
2+2x2=6 - Reply to this comment
- I''''M THINKING
Posted by tiddsanbeer at 06:52 PM : Dec 20, 2007
Wow that is a new process for you, take your time please. - Reply to this comment
- 1 billion dollar can build up to 20,000 social homes units in subsidized form of low cost housing project.
70 billion dollar can build up to 1,400,000 social houses. It''s almost the total need for social housing in America.
Repukons nad right-wingers prefer spending 70 billion over war, destruction, not construction. And they sell-call Christians... What a shame! - Reply to this comment
- mrconservatv,
What are you?
A. Republican
B. Democrat
C. Intelligent
You can only CHOOSE one! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by tiddsanbeer at 06:41 PM : Dec 20, 2007
You couldn''t graduate to wine and women. POOR SLOB - Reply to this comment
- YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE.
Posted by tiddsanbeer at 06:41 PM : Dec 20, 2007
Does that mean you''re not voting for Ron Paul maybe you can vote for some other phony Republican like Rudy. - Reply to this comment
- The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism by Naomi Klein
- Reply to this comment
- brianp55,
Many who think they live in middle income neighborhoods do not live in middle income neighborhoods. - Reply to this comment
- The problem is that now these project residents will be "Section-8''d" into middle income neighborhoods.
- Reply to this comment
- ericjc1,
Read up on the history of restrictive covenants. These areas were never intended to be stepping stones. They were intended to be graveyards. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by tiddsanbeer at 06:32 PM : Dec 20, 2007
You''re a prime example why abortion in some cases is not wrong to bad you made it. - Reply to this comment




