Comments on: Contempt Citations For Rove, Bolten
Senate Panel Slams Bush Aides For Failing To Cooperate In Prosecutor Firings Probe
- They are on a mission for their sky god. How could you have not known?
Posted by jmcgilvray at 04:15 PM : Dec 13, 2007
And they''ve the passage redacted in their bibles that states "obey the laws of the land", obviously..... - Reply to this comment
- Rove, with his piggy jowls, looks a LOT like Limbaugh and Starr. We must wonder if they all came from the same unknown boar?
- Reply to this comment
- SBB2211
why does it bother you that congress wants to fulfill constitutional responsibility of oversight over bush administration?? - Reply to this comment
- You just described CONGRESS perfectly.
Posted by SBB2211 at 03:55 PM : Dec 13, 2007
Did I now? You must have slept through the 2006 elections when a whole slew of congressmen were held accountable by the voters...... - Reply to this comment
- if bush wasn''t involved then white house can''t claim executive privelege -- the only way to claim executive privelege is if bush was involved.
So which is it?? - Reply to this comment
- Gee, Pat Leahy will not get to grandstand at a Judicial Committee "show hearing". Too bad. (Yawn)
- Reply to this comment
- formrusmcsgt
"Anyone who thinks they can operate with no oversight whatsover, conduct themselves with complete disregard for the law or morality, and thumb their nose at the other branches of government as if they didn''''t even exist are, indeed, contemptuous individuals and deserve to be cited as such."
You just described CONGRESS perfectly. - Reply to this comment
- Well, the current Congress IS contemptible. It can''t pass budgets, can''t get us out of Iraq, can''t properly oversee the pages/interns, can''t do anything except waste time on petty political fueding, can''t see anything except President Bush, etc. . .
- Reply to this comment
- When any aid, congressional or legislative, try to avoiding the scrutiny of congress they are in essence trying to escape the checks and balances put in place by the US Constitution. And this in itself is a criminal act, but criminal acts by other parties make this escapement possible.
- Reply to this comment
- Anyone who thinks they can operate with no oversight whatsover, conduct themselves with complete disregard for the law or morality, and thumb their nose at the other branches of government as if they didn''t even exist are, indeed, contemptuous individuals and deserve to be cited as such.
- Reply to this comment
- No one should be above the law, not even these yahoos. Unfortunately, they''ll probably get away with a fine that amounts to pocket change for them. Then they''ll both go to the local pub together and laugh about it. It''s sad to say, but justice is dead when it comes to politicians with holding information.
- Reply to this comment
- Won''t happen. They will get their secret backdoor deal, and the Bush regime will triumph it as a blow against terrorism.
- Reply to this comment
- About time too.
- Reply to this comment




