Comments on: Deadly Ice Storm Glazes Midsection Of U.S.

Storm Snaps Power Lines, Closes Schools In Midwest; 23 Deaths Blamed On Weather

[one_american]

Liberals can''t handle the truth.

[gslinger3]

Gore is not a visionaly, Bush is a visionary and has freed IRAQ!

FREEDOM FOR THE IRAQIS!!!!

[nolalou]

One_American , it makes me sick to have to admit that under our form of goverment, even morons like you have voice! Don''t get me wrong, I respect your right to state your opinion, but that doesn''t mean I consider you any less of an IDIOT!

[gslinger3]

Geeze,

This has to terrible news for all you Global warmed enviromentalist nuts cases in here!

[andor3]

"Equal numbers of ''scientists'' disagree with the ''scientists'' who provided the data that confirms global warming...so many in fact that they created an ''error'' list. Check it out,..."

Simply not true. I checked it out. You got any facts? There is consensus in the scientific community on human activity as a primary cause in climate change. It is not being debated in any serious forum. A few people are claiming scientific credentials and opposition just because it gets attention because their view is considered wacky, and also because there is big money pushing to get ANYONE to speak up and oppose the science.

[cmp271]

No wonder we had an ice storm, Hillary was nearby. In the summer Iowa never needed any air conditioning, she was always around.

What are any of these candidates doing for anyone?

[aaabee-2009]

Equal numbers of ''''scientists'''' disagree with the ''''scientists'''' who provided the data that confirms global warming.Posted by likeitis5050 at 01:18 PM : Dec 11, 2007

No, they don''t. Those scientists could well be bought experts, most of whom have not come forward to let the public examine their evironmental credentials nor have they allowed investigation into their ties to non-envirnmental corporations. What is allowed is the publishing of their "expert" opinion in the news.

You have only been told that there is an "error" list without even knowing who is on it. Try to find out who the participants are and see if there is disclosure about the careers and ambitions of those so-called anti-GW "experts". If you can find reasonable accreditation for even a small percentage of them, I will give you this point, but you can''t. I have researched the french trial and their errors and little is being let out about it, which lends NO credibility to claims of errors if the claiments don''t show themselves and the record of their own expertice.

Cemented world views, encapsulated by fear and greed, are not a American-only danger.

[likeitis5050]

However the scientists who work in the field have explained this very well and it is in the literature. Look into it and you see that it does nothing to take away from the theory of human-caused climate change.

----------

Posted by andor

The sky is falling...you are correct...how stupid of us not to all be out there with you stopping all this. Have fun spending your hours on line chastising ''ignorance''...everyone has to have something that gives them reasons to breath. Tah tah...

[aaabee-2009]

Makes you sick to know you''''ve been had, doesn''''t it?
Posted by One_American at 12:49 PM : Dec 11, 2007

I would rather be taken by Al Gore, who is trying to save the planet, than be in your shoes. You are being taken by George Bush, who is busy destroying the planet so he and Cheney can put a few more dollars in their already-bulging pockets.

I buy the pollution-is-changing-our-planet story with the same loyalty as you bought the bringing-democracy-to-Iraq story. That makes us both suckers. LOL

[likeitis5050]

His critics are poster children for lazy, ignorant people who stick their heads in the sand and hope their mommy will save them. So much of their argument boils down to "it''''s hard. I''''m lazy and scared of change. Science confuses me so I pretend. And I hate real leaders and moral courage causes it makes me look bad."
-----------

Posted by andor3

And then there are those who choose to actually research ''facts provided from a consensus of scientists'' because they know just adding the title scientist to one''s name doesn''t make it valid. Equal numbers of ''scientists'' disagree with the ''scientists'' who provided the data that confirms global warming...so many in fact that they created an ''error'' list. Check it out, unless you''re too lazy or too scared, or maybe it would just confuse you to have alternate views of something to have to look into for yourself.