Comments on: Wounded Vet Told To Pay Back Bonus
Partially-Blinded In Iraq, GI Billed For Army Signing Bonus; Pentagon Admits Mistake
- Is this the sort of treatment other Iraqi Vet''s expect to receive at the hands of that corrupt moron GW Bush and the rest of his slime bucket Republicanazis?
That coward GW Bush never joined up in the armed forces - though his daddy did find him a nice safe job where he could snort all the cocaine he wanted and drink all the alcohol he wanted.
This treatment of our brave men and women makes me sick.
And to think - that piece of sh|t GW Bush started this mess just to impress his daddy. - Reply to this comment
- This is enough to make you puke.
Every day we see our soldiers treated like dirt...
What do they pay the private contractors?
Thanks Mr. President for more good news for Thanksgiving.
We should end the war tomorrow. - Reply to this comment
- This is enough to make you puke.
Every day we see our soldiers treated like dirt...
What do they pay the private contractors?
Thanks Mr. President for more good news for Thanksgiving.
We should end the war tomorrow. - Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This is enough to make you puke.
Every day we see our soldiers treated like dirt...
What do they pay the private contractors?
Thanks Mr. President for more good news for Thanksgiving.
We should end the war tomorrow. - Reply to this comment
- This is enough to make you puke.
Every day we see our soldiers treated like dirt...
What do they pay the private contractors?
Thanks Mr. President for more good news for Thanksgiving.
We should end the war tomorrow. - Reply to this comment
- Thats Right - All the Billions wasted paying Haliburton no bid contracts so they can build a new Headquarters in Dubai where the US has no extradition for these Crooks - how else is American supposed to pay for this war?
That''s Right - MAKE THE SOLDIERS PAY FOR THE WAR THEY ARE FIGHTING - If they didn''t join in the first place they wouldn''t be in this mess - Quote by the Honorable VP Cheney. - Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This has got to be one the most insane application of material fairness by assimilationists that I have ever seen. With injury rates that are quite high, to prorate paybacks based upon discharge due to injuries is not forgivable. The Pentagon doesn''t need an attitude change, they need a thorough purge to weed these monstrous assimilationist mentalities out of our national defense mechanisms. Paying mercenaries 100,000 dollars a year and then collecting 3,000 from an injured vet is obscene. There should be prison for those involved in these orders and reasoning, from bottom to top. What a disgrace.
- Reply to this comment
- This sort of treatment to veterans is nothing new. McNamara is probably quite proud of his ''nam-era'' bean-counting approach now being applied to avoiding the debt the nation owes to those who have ''put themselves in harm''s way''. It worked well for building Fords in his day, and today for administrations managed by chickenhawks.
- Reply to this comment
- This sort of treatment to veterans is nothing new. McNamara is probably quite proud of his ''nam-era'' bean-counting approach now being applied to avoiding the debt the nation owes to those who have ''put themselves in harm''s way''. It worked well for building Fords in his day, and today for administrations managed by chickenhawks.
- Reply to this comment
- This sort of treatment to veterans is nothing new. McNamara is probably quite proud of his ''nam-era'' bean-counting approach now being applied to avoiding the debt the nation owes to those who have ''put themselves in harm''s way''. It worked well for building Fords in his day, and today for administrations managed by chickenhawks.
- Reply to this comment
- This sort of treatment to veterans is nothing new. McNamara is probably quite proud of his ''nam-era'' bean-counting approach now being applied to avoiding the debt the nation owes to those who have ''put themselves in harm''s way''. It worked well for building Fords in his day, and today for administrations managed by chickenhawks.
- Reply to this comment
- This sort of treatment to veterans is nothing new. McNamara is probably quite proud of his ''nam-era'' bean-counting approach now being applied to avoiding the debt the nation owes to those who have ''put themselves in harm''s way''. It worked well for building Fords in his day, and today for administrations managed by chickenhawks.
- Reply to this comment
How gold pays for 



