Comments on: Rice Accosted By Anti-War Protester
Secretary Of State Called A 'War Criminal' At House Committee Hearing
Add a Comment See all 232 Comments
- Rice just kept going on as if nothing happened of course she did.
SHE DOESN''T KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON ANYWAY.
This is not even funny anymore. I mean why now this administration has done nothing for the last 7 years now they want to try to do something. They should just sit down and be quite they are embarrassing themselves. - Reply to this comment
- Condoleezza Rice is a real extreme "yes man" for Bush and Cheny, and the majority of the voting population knows this.
Too bad. - Reply to this comment
- To erichsh
Yo, dude, not fair! I answered your questions.... - Reply to this comment
- something most be up...
Posted by brianbwb at 03:03 AM : Oct 25, 2007
I think were both just a tab suspicious about that cat especially that one continuous question.
Got to go see next time - Reply to this comment
- Well he took that thumping well.
Posted by menofoz
I will give him credit, by this point they usually retreat to infantile name calling, ang phrases like " I hope they put you in Guantamo.." and "traitor commie-terrorist haji sympathizer" and other such drivel.
So far, he has been remarkably civilized for an apparent Bush supporter, something most be up... - Reply to this comment
- To erichsh
Now I have some questions for you.
Do you think that Iraq was behind 9/11, even though the alleged hijackers were all Saudis?
Do you think that Saddam actually had WMDs, of which the UN inspectors said before the invasion that there was no evidence, and that he was somehow able to secretly give them to his enemies in Syria so they wouldn''t be discovered by US troops?
Most importantly, do you believe that a US president should be able to lie in order to send troops into harm''s way, to kill innocent people, and be killed by the resistance, for no other reason than personal enrichment, and then, after the lies are revealed, keep the troops in harms'' way? - Reply to this comment
- That protester should be sent to Guantanamo - how dare she speak to Condi like that. This lady must be a terrorist to appose anything this White House does. The nerve, the audacity to question our leaders who have tried to do whatever they can to continue this Illegal war not to make Hallibuton Rich but to protect the American citizens. Why else would Billions of dollars in contractor fees be missing with no audit trails - it is to keep Americans safe - Pay off the the corporations not to attack Americans! Oops, I mean terrorists not to attack Americans. It is amazing that people who never wore the uniform or who deserted their posts seem to believe that they can run the military. Now, the target is Iran! Bring Christianity to the middle east again! After all - Europe couldn''t do it - But America Can!!!! I say watch out you protesters - your phones are bugged - you have the FBI watching you - you have the CIA going through your garbage and talking to your friends - once you talk to any tanned looking bearded person you will be sent where you belong - Guantanamo! I hear the Mai Tai''s are Great there - they serve them to you in a buckets while you are laying on your back with your head covered - ahhh, drowning in Mai Tai''s.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by brianbwb at 02:34 AM : Oct 25, 2007
Well he took that thumping well. - Reply to this comment
- Lee Hamilton, Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission
Lee Hamilton: I don%u2019t believe for a minute that we got everything right. We wrote a first draft of history. ... People will be investigating 9/11 for the next hundred years in this country, and they%u2019re going to find out some things that we missed here.
Evan Solomon: The first chapter of the book is ''the Commission was set up to fail.'' ... Why do you think you were set up to fail?
Hamilton: Well, for a number of reasons: ... we got started late; we had a very short time frame - indeed, we had to get it extended; we did not have enough money - 3 million dollars to conduct an extensive investigation. We needed more, we got more, but it took us a while to get it. ...
We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. - Reply to this comment
- To erichsh
Actually, it would have happened eight years earlier, but the plans were temporarily derailed by a Clinton presidency, which would have cut dubya out of the money, and Herbie dubya didn''t want that. - Reply to this comment
- Grand Lake Theater
3200 Grand Avenue, Oakland, California
A True Hero on 9/11
and ever since then...
With Special Guests Peter Dale Scott and Cindy Sheehan
William Rodriguez, who was working as custodian in-charge of three 110-story stairwells in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on the day it was destroyed, and who personally saved fifteen others from certain death, will share his harrowing experience of the 9-11 tragedy at a special presentation,
At the White House on five occasions and recognized as a %u201CNational Hero%u201D by the Senate of Puerto Rico, William Rodriguez, in possession of a master key to all of the stairwell doors at each floor in the 110 story building that day, personally saved the lives of 15 people and aided NYC firefighters in saving hundreds of others.
Though he advocated for the creation of the 9-11 Commission and testified before the commission members -- his private testimony before the Commission was excluded from its final report. Rodriguez is now raising questions about what he describes as serious gaps in the official story and is calling for a deeper, more energetic and international based investigation into every possible aspect, failure and contributing circumstance leading to the tragedy. - Reply to this comment
- brianbwb - nope - still not clear.
Let me re-ask based on your last response:
Do you believe that George Schultz (CEO, Bechtel Corp.), and VP Cheney ("ex"CEO Halliburton) together personally ordered 9-11? And that Bush merely followed along like a blind puppet? Is that closer to what you truly believe? YES or NO. And if the answer is "YES", please offer up a short explanation of just HOW they pulled off this monumental feat of murder and treason?
Posted by erichsh
1. Yes.
2. They bribed, paid, and threatened, so it happened.
It was the culmination of years of planning. During the Afghan Russian war, who was the head of the CIA? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by erichsh at 02:19 AM : Oct 25, 2007
Oh so sorry to burst your brain. NO - Reply to this comment
- Bush Seeks To Restrict Hill Probes Of Sept. 11, The Washington Post: 1/30/02. And Bush Asks Daschle to Limit Sept. 11 probes, ALLPOLITICS, CNN : 1/29/02.
Cheney: Investigators, Keep Out, Newsweek Magazine: 10/21/02.
10/16/2007 NIST CAN''T EXPLAIN
We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse WTC 1,2 & 7
A 32-story building burns for more than 24 hours and does not collapse. It does not collapse because buildings made of steel and concrete, despite what we are led to believe, do not typically fall to the ground because of fire, even a protracted fire as witnessed in Madrid. In fact before September 11th, 2001, no building had ever collapsed as a result of fire alone. In past events, high-rise buildings burned for as long as six days before the fires were extinguished and yet remained standing.
DID NOT COLLASPE
ABC News: Empire State Building Sustained CrashEmpire State Building Hit by Military Plane, 14 Killed. Sept. 11 ... The plane struck the building 913 feet above the ground, at 34th Street in midtown. ...
abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92525&page=1 - Similar pages - Reply to this comment
- What are you saying, menofoz? Did Bush personally order 9-11? YES or NO. Don''t be ashamed to admit if you believe it. I''ll be ashamed of you instead.
- Reply to this comment
- Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation
By Mike Hersh
Oct 24, 2002
George Bush is blocking a full public inquiry into 9-11. Richard Cheney threatens Democrats to keep quiet.
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry, Reuters News Service: 5/26/02.
WHITE HOUSE RESISTED FULL FUNDING
WHITE HOUSE OPPOSED TIME EXTENSION FOR FINISHING COMMISSION''S WORK
WHITE HOUSE DENIES REQUEST FOR PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFS: The commission has struggled with the White House for access to the "Presidential Daily Brief" (PDB),
WHITE HOUSE DENIES ACCESS TO PANEL''S OWN NOTES
PRESIDENT''S CHIEF COUNSEL TRIES TO INFLUENCE PANEL: Top White House counsel Alberto Gonzales tried to manipulate the 9/11 Commission
WHITE HOUSE TRIES TO LIMIT BUSH''S TESTIMONY TO ONE HOUR: On February 25, 2004, President Bush and Vice President *** Cheney announced "strict limits" - Reply to this comment
- I''d suggest you go one step further. Rather than refrain from mocking "Churchianity", why not actually swallow hard and try to Respect those lemonade/bromide swillers? Give them credit for attempting to live decent, upstanding lives according to their Christian faith? At least try not to lump them into the same boat as those savage, bloodthirsty Christians of the Middle Ages?
- Reply to this comment
- The summary goes on to note that the FBI had been investigating Bin Laden family activities in the U.S. prior to Sept. 11. One relative of Osama had a relationship with a suspected terrorist organization that had been investigated " but for some reason [FBI] agents were pulled off the trail," according to the BBC report. Speaking of similar previous U.S. behavior, a former head of the U.S. visa bureau in Saidi Arabia says on camera, " I complained there. I complained here in Washington ... and I was ignored. What I was doing was giving visas to terrorists, recruited by the CIA and Osama bin Laden to come back to the United States for training to be used in the war in Afghanistan against the then Soviets."
The Sidney summary concludes, " The [BBC] program said it had been told by a highly placed source in a US intelligence agency there had always been "constraints" on investigating Saudis, but under [present] President George Bush it had become much worse. After the elections, the intelligence agencies were told to "back off" from investigating the bin Laden family and the Saudi royals. The policy was reversed after September 11, it reported." - Reply to this comment
- It''s very simple, IceMan. You (plural, humanists) go about your life ascribing to your set of rules, ignore and internally dismiss the perceived sleights of Christians you think want you to burn in hell. In turn, Christians will not attempt to burn heretics such as yourself at the stake as they may have tried to do 500 years ago, but instead will similarly respect your worldview and leave you alone. Fair enough? As for myself, I straddle a middle ground, but, that''s not relevant here.
- Reply to this comment
- And for the record, I do not mock "Churchianity."
It is a harmless and pleasant cultrual diversion. People get to put on their "Sunday Best" and have a pleasant community experience together.
Sometimes there"s even folk singing with guitar music, and lemonade afterwards. - Reply to this comment
