Comments on: Officials: Arson Behind Santiago Fire

Meanwhile Winds Slow, Giving Firefighters A Fighting Chance

Add a Comment See all 306 Comments
by drummer94 October 25, 2007 11:58 AM EDT
golddude that is what I have said numerous times - $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Do you want to know what happened to the 1.2 bil the state dept. "lost"? Me too.
Reply to this comment
by aaabee-2009 October 25, 2007 11:57 AM EDT
Posted by sunseeker6 at 08:45 AM : Oct 25, 2007

People just get on here to post their junk and try to stir arguements.

Thanks for helping derail the comments with your Gore spittle. Constantly a one-way street with you Republicans, isn''t it? Don''t bash Bush but let me bash Gore.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 October 25, 2007 11:56 AM EDT
California undergo''s floods yearly and then fires.
Hmmm you would think that someone would figure out how to create a massive "irrigation" system to prevent the latter from occurring and at the same time minimize the damage of both. Up front cost''s would be exboriant however one has to look at the longer picture.
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit October 25, 2007 11:48 AM EDT
Yes, there is absolutely zero doubt that President Clinton was not only better--but hardly in the same league beneath the sea as Bushmaster and Father figure.

Super Duper DUH.
Reply to this comment
by sunseeker6 October 25, 2007 11:45 AM EDT
Why the Bush bashing? This fire does not have anything to do with Global Warming, it''s ARSON! Read the story you idiots! Arson means that some person(s) set the fire on purpose. Arson has happened throughout history, no matter who is President. For the comments of removing Bush, yea Clinton was a lot better, haha. Hey maybe put Jimmy Carter back in office, now there was a great President (sarcasm for those who don''t understand). As far as Global Warming, yes I buy into the story, but how much Does Gore contribute to it? How many houses does he heat/cool? How big are the cars his family drive? How many pools does he fill and heat? How much fuel does he waste flying around the country? He is a hypocrite, do as I say, not as I do.
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit October 25, 2007 11:43 AM EDT
What might happen if we foece the removal of the figurehead Scarecrows???

We The People might see more clearly who to question...
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 October 25, 2007 11:42 AM EDT
So San Diego Republicans in hill top mansions can be brought down by one disgrunted illegal with a match? Is this a message for the future of America? Will our country self-destruct as the Neocon Repugs preside over the biggest transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in US history? You got your Bushit tax cuts, Mr. and Mrs. Republican Billionaire, but can you protect yourself from the neighbors you''ve robbed?
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit October 25, 2007 11:40 AM EDT
"C''''mon goldesprit, the military? Nevagonnahappen. Some new Tom Jefferson, George Washington, Ben Franklin et al, maybe. And move the capitol a little farther- pick a direction. We certainly do not need or want a military in charge. That''''s why we left England and the ''king''."
posted by drummer94 at 08:33 AM : Oct 25, 2007

Just in case you never concieved of this:
The Military Industrial Complex IS currently in charge, thru *** Cheny, thru Bush.

Think about it. Consider Halliburton. Oil.

I''m just pointing out that even these guys may tire of flunkies pretending to nail every speech and run the show--when they can''t walk and chew gum without threatening WW III.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o October 25, 2007 11:35 AM EDT
Posted by goldesprit at 08:24 AM : Oct 25, 2007

You want to see a military coop? Not that I disagree with Bushitt being gone, and Cheney as well, but not with the military, not the place for them.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 October 25, 2007 11:33 AM EDT
C''mon goldesprit, the military? Nevagonnahappen. Some new Tom Jefferson, George Washington, Ben Franklin et al, maybe. And move the capitol a little farther- pick a direction. We certainly do not need or want a military in charge. That''s why we left England and the "king".
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 October 25, 2007 11:29 AM EDT
It should be also be interesting to see how many ignorant liberals
will claim that Bush started this fire the same way he created hurricane Katrina

LOL



Posted by MCVett

Hahahahaaa!!! Haven''t you heard? It''s global warming; per political Democratic polarization strategy...yep...had Bush spent as much on global warming awareness as he''s spent on getting our troops'' heads blown off for his amusement...we wouldn''t be looking at the devistation in CA from a fire created because of global warming. Just love the way the Dems drop everything to take care of a problem at hand first...tend to their people first...and then finger point and blame once the crisis is under control....what a group of dedicated ''people first'' Americans. Luckily, for these people, they aren''t totally wiped out financially and will rebuild thanks to the $500,000,000.00 insurance policies on their $200,000,000.00 homes...that must be why the Dems feel they can get right to the business of bashing politics instead pitching in and helping....

oh, that and ramming yet another, bigger version of the SCHIP down the throats of House members...this makes 3 shots and something already turned down 2 times, for obvious reasons. Pelosi...girl...get l..aid and you''ll see things differently...honest, you will.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 October 25, 2007 11:29 AM EDT
New photo''s of Rudy

http://www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0073629/10.html?seq=5
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit October 25, 2007 11:24 AM EDT
Heres what I mean:
Bush needs to be releived of command, by the military.
Then, we need to re-install a real president, thru proper proceedures.

Cheny needs a jail cell.
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit October 25, 2007 11:22 AM EDT
"Wow, the 25 percenters are out in full force this morning."
Posted by Smirk5

You might even be on my side by making such a cryptic statement.

Obviously you yearn for contact--rather than having a real comment that might need to be defended from the interior ot your first post, without goading.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 October 25, 2007 11:20 AM EDT
25% smirk? Gotta be lower than that. Funny that they think that we would blame shrub for the fires. Then again, that would take the focus off''n Iraq. Hmmm. Where was Cheney the last few days?
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 October 25, 2007 11:15 AM EDT
Wow, the 25 percenters are out in full force this morning.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 October 25, 2007 11:12 AM EDT
Arson? *** is in those morons minds? The winds that whip is bad enough, but some *** think this is cute? T-smash/starsbars you haven''t left yet? Run and support the chimp-in-chief. Or are you waitin for Cuba? Much nicer weather there. I heard on the news this am that alkida could be involved. They want to destroy Disneyland. The horror, the horror.
Reply to this comment
by goldesprit October 25, 2007 11:04 AM EDT
"the massive Santiago Canyon Fire -- which has caused an estimated $10 million in damage -- is being officially declared an arson, and a $70,000 reward is being offered to find the arsonist."

Cool! Now the insurance companies can try to wriggle out of paying because of a single "arsonist".

I was going to really nail this, but here''s a better way of putting it:
I think it was only Lee Harvey Oswald.

Trick or treat?
Reply to this comment
by mcvett October 25, 2007 10:55 AM EDT
I guarantee you the very same liberals who criticized Bush
for not going to New Orleans quick enough,
will now be the same ones who will criticize Bush for
going to California too soon!!!!

hypocrits

It should be also be interesting to see how many ignorant liberals
will claim that Bush started this fire the same way he created hurricane Katrina

LOL

Reply to this comment
by jowand October 25, 2007 10:44 AM EDT
Katrina -- devastion covered 3 states. 250,000 homes lost in New Oleans alone. Traffic as far away as Houston brought to a standstill by standing water on the roads. It was weeks before the water was pumped out or receeded.

California fires -- 1500 homes lost. 4 days and it''''s all but over.

Nah, wait. California''''s day is coming.

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 05:55 AM : Oct 25, 2007

Don''t forget Mr Ray "Choclate City" Naegan, he got his family out of N.Orleans before Katrina hit, s-c-r-e-w- the people of N Orleans. Then went back to catfish farming with all of the city school buses under 4 feet of water
Reply to this comment
See all 306 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now


For Those Who
Want To Help:
FEMA refers the public to two Web sites, Network for Food and NVOAD (National Voluntary Organizations Active In Disasters).

For more aid resources: click here
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (307 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: