Comments on: Study Seeks Clues To Homosexuality

1,000 Gay Brothers And Relatives Participate In Study Seeking Genetic Clues

[tiddsanbeer]

AM I ANTI-GAY??? TOO A QUEER, YES. TOO A NORMAL PERSON WHO CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TUNA AND SH IT....NO.

[tiddsanbeer]

IF A PERSON IS BORN WITH 6 LEGS AND NO P ECKER, HE IS FOUND TO HAVE A GENETIC DEFECT. IF HE IS BORN WITH 6 P ECKERS AND NO LEGS, HE IS A PORN STAR.(AT LEAST IN THIS TOOO -TOLERANT COUNTRY)

[tiddsanbeer]

AIDS. THE SINGLE MOST CURABLE DISEASE IN THE WORLD....KEEP YOUR FU KKIN'' ZIPPER UP....JUST SAY "NO".

[tiddsanbeer]

HOMOSEXUALITY. IT DOESN''T HAVE TO BE BOILED DOWN TO A "CHOICE" OR A "GENETIC DEFECT"...IT CAN BE EITHER.

[tiddsanbeer]

PEOPLE ARE NOT BORN HOMOSEXUAL....THEY JUST GET SUCKED INTO IT....

[bks59]

Julio is cute I wonder if he is available to date.

[honestabe8]

Come On, Micma: When you speak for a petty, angry god, there are always people to hate.

[micma-2009]

Who will the Bible thumpers hate when homosexuality is proven not to be a choice?

[honestabe8]

And, disregarding a position that is stated in the bible does not fly against the constitution. Everyone has a right to believe in whatever fairy tales they wish.

[honestabe8]

Nor does the bible for most of the people in the world.

[three-o-six]

If you are a Christian (I am an agnostic, but I am making their case) Then you have the right to call homosexuality wrong because the Bible call it wrong. To disregaurd this position flys directly against the constitution. It does not matter what genetics finds out as they do not define what is right and what is wrong!!!!

[honestabe8]

And, if violence is "wrong" then there goes much of what we call sport

[honestabe8]

three-oh-six: what is "wrong" about homosexuality? i can see violence being wrong because it often involves a non-consenting person. that is not the case with homosexuality

[sjw1253]

I cannot believe all of the biblical issues being brought out here.

All who believe what was written thousands of years ago in a different language than is spoken now by human translators (with human tendencies to use their own ideas influence their "translations") as "the truth" are not objective at all.

I am trying to be nice as I do believe the Bible has many good things - but people make it into something that it is not... If you evaluate the Bible and the different people over periods of time - it clearly is not written by "God"...

The "world" to these people was the known areas where these people lived. They had no knowledge of the real world and thus it was not a part of what was written. Descriptions of the whole world being flooded were clearly faulty.

The Bible is a lot Fairy Tale and to condemn people for thoughts of primitive people who had a desire to define morality is ridiculous. The biggest reason war continues and people kill and perpetuate hate is due to the "Holy" interpretations.

Learn to take the most important message from the Bible about God and Jesus and that is that all of God''s children deserve to be loved and treated as anyone else would want to be treated. This is considered the Golden Rule...

[three-o-six]

Even if a genetic predisposition can be found for homosexual behaviour it does not make it "right". If it did there is a clear genetic link fo those males with an extra y-chromozone. They are genetically predesposed to violent behaviour. So if we allow homosexual behaviour because it is genetic then we will also have to allow violence on the same argument.

"Right" and "Wrong" are defined by ones moral orientation such as religion

If you happen to be a subscriber to a religious idea that declares that homosexuality is wrong -- then for you it is!

For homosexuals do declare that we can not call it "wrong" violates our right to believe as we see fit.

Violence is wrong and so is homosexuality

[three-o-six]

Even if a genetic predisposition can be found for homosexual behaviour it does not make it "right". If it did there is a clear genetic link fo those males with an extra y-chromozone. They are genetically predesposed to violent behaviour. So if we allow homosexual behaviour because it is genetic then we will also have to allow violence on the same argument.

"Right" and "Wrong" are defined by ones moral orientation such as religion

If you happen to be a subscriber to a religious idea that declares that homosexuality is wrong -- then for you it is!

For homosexuals do declare that we can not call it "wrong" violates our right to believe as we see fit.

Violence is wrong and so is homosexuality

[three-o-six]

Even if a genetic predisposition can be found for homosexual behaviour it does not make it "right". If it did there is a clear genetic link fo those males with an extra y-chromozone. They are genetically predesposed to violent behaviour. So if we allow homosexual behaviour because it is genetic then we will also have to allow violence on the same argument.

"Right" and "Wrong" are defined by ones moral orientation such as religion

If you happen to be a subscriber to a religious idea that declares that homosexuality is wrong -- then for you it is!

For homosexuals do declare that we can not call it "wrong" violates our right to believe as we see fit.

Violence is wrong and so is homosexuality

[three-o-six]

Even if a genetic predisposition can be found for homosexual behaviour it does not make it "right". If it did there is a clear genetic link fo those males with an extra y-chromozone. They are genetically predesposed to violent behaviour. So if we allow homosexual behaviour because it is genetic then we will also have to allow violence on the same argument.

"Right" and "Wrong" are defined by ones moral orientation such as religion

If you happen to be a subscriber to a religious idea that declares that homosexuality is wrong -- then for you it is!

For homosexuals do declare that we can not call it "wrong" violates our right to believe as we see fit.

Violence is wrong and so is homosexuality

[three-o-six]

Even if a genetic predisposition can be found for homosexual behaviour it does not make it "right". If it did there is a clear genetic link fo those males with an extra y-chromozone. They are genetically predesposed to violent behaviour. So if we allow homosexual behaviour because it is genetic then we will also have to allow violence on the same argument.

"Right" and "Wrong" are defined by ones moral orientation such as religion

If you happen to be a subscriber to a religious idea that declares that homosexuality is wrong -- then for you it is!

For homosexuals do declare that we can not call it "wrong" violates our right to believe as we see fit.

Violence is wrong and so is homosexuality

[three-o-six]

Even if a genetic predisposition can be found for homosexual behaviour it does not make it "right". If it did there is a clear genetic link fo those males with an extra y-chromozone. They are genetically predesposed to violent behaviour. So if we allow homosexual behaviour because it is genetic then we will also have to allow violence on the same argument.

"Right" and "Wrong" are defined by ones moral orientation such as religion

If you happen to be a subscriber to a religious idea that declares that homosexuality is wrong -- then for you it is!

For homosexuals do declare that we can not call it "wrong" violates our right to believe as we see fit.

Violence is wrong and so is homosexuality