Comments on: Bush Insists On Telecom Immunity

President Says He Won't Sign Democrats' Eavesdropping Bill Without Immunity Provision

[finewoven]

The proof isn''''t in the pudding.

The proof of the pudding is in the tasting or, alternatively, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Posted by juwboy at 05:21 AM : Oct 11, 2007

So I got my metaphor turned around. Tasting it, or experiencing it is the proof.

I was concerned there for a long time, thinking there my be something related to alcohol in pudding that it might be 80 proof or something. Then I''d really be turned around.

[simonsez40]

What an idiot - can we put Bush in the Fulton prison? Maybe he could round up the Aryan Brotherhood and create his own utopia without laws that you have to follow????

[liberalme]

As long as he is "insisting" on this--we should all "insist" he go to jail now--do not pass go and do not collect $200.

Lets "insist" that anyone who has been killed, maimed or injured because of his war for profit--should be able to sue his butt for all they can get.

The American people need to start "insisting" on retribution from this government, after all, this is OUR COUNTRY!

[liberalme]

Awww come on---we''re all targets!! Bushs'' Anti-Americanism is blatently apparent!

Bush?? Read the Constitution? He can''t find anyone to read it to him that agrees with it!

RULING by his own set of rules and laws--this idiot has destroyed the very core of what being an American means.

I pray to God these "evil doers"are held accountable for EVERYTHING they have done, not only to us, but to Iraquis as well.

This

[mcvet]

This is Amazing! This low life piece of Human Trash and the Cult that follows him have taken to the bunker. He''s so low in the opinion polls that he doesn''t care and those who drink the kool aid he''s handing out, aren''t smart enought to know what he is and has done to our beloved constitution. How ANYONE can read that Constitution and say that the actions taken by this president from He11 are right should have another drink of Kool Aid... make that TWO drinks!! Sieg Heil Bush!! SIEG HEIL!! SIEG HEIL!!

[trillion1]

These companies broke the law at bush''s behest which makes him guilty. If they hadn''t commited a crime then would be no need for immunity.

[jjp735i]

I am a little confused. Bush made it sound like the law allowed him to spy with out a warrant, yet now he wants a law that goes back and gives retroactive immunity to U.S. telecommunications companies that did the dirty deed. So Bush lied and those companies spied on Americans against the law? Why else would Bush want this law passed? To cover his arse of course. Congress should not cover Bush and his illegal act against us, nor cover the arse of the telecommunications companies. They broke the law and should be held accountable for it.

[juwboy]

finewoven:

The proof isn''t in the pudding.

The proof of the pudding is in the tasting or, alternatively, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

[finewoven]

This administration is, by definition, "liberal". It is not a law-abiding conservative leadership.
Posted by UnderMyBoot at 01:19 PM : Oct 10, 2007

BITE YOUR TOUNGE!! Man, if word got out.

[finewoven]

But sorry congress will let him finish the term so they won''''t have to get thier hands dirty and to be honest they should ALL be voted out of office. Posted by crzmeat at 01:54 PM : Oct 10, 2007

Do you think that''s really it? I would argue that we simply don''t want the Office of the President to be held in disrepute. To protect the image of the office, people will ignore all the harshest suggestions, even if there is substantial proof.

Does anybody know why "the proof is in the pudding." I haven''t been able to figure this out.