Comments on: Airlines Sue FBI And CIA Over 9/11 Blame

Aviation Companies Want To Interview Investigators From Both Agencies Concerning Blame For The Attacks

Add a Comment See all 153 Comments
by bareemperor August 8, 2007 1:15 PM EDT
The five little neocons always yell 'conspiracy theory' whenever the 78 % of US start asking the hard questions...

The airlines were pawns in the game.

The CIA hasn't ever released a report on 9/11 - why?

The FBI already knew the names of the hijackers, yet did nothing to stop them - why?

The CIA was involved in the stock market airline short calls prior to 9/11 - why?

Bu$hCo destroyed the 9/11 crime scene before airline investigators could go to work - why?

Yes, we are all 'moonbats'...
And we are the majority??? Hmmmm.
Reply to this comment
by kaiyo4u August 8, 2007 1:09 PM EDT
Bull, The airline is wrong and they don't want to pay up. The airline did not do the job of making the people on borad safe. And the The two WTC Towers were NOT the worst built buildings in New York.
Posted by lawandorder7 at 09:56 AM : Aug 08, 2007

How do you make the airlines safe when the federal marshalls were taken off aircraft many years ago and only re-implemented after 9/11?
Pilots are only now allowed to carry after extensive training.

Where were the people who had briefcases? A hard case brought up from below would disable an attacker long enough to disarm someone with a box cutter... There were how many terrorists aboard and how many passengers?

There is enough of a paper trail to suggest our government knew an event would occur, but did little to stop it.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 August 8, 2007 1:06 PM EDT
Please ! Google WHO was the head of security at WTC up until 9-10-01.

Eye-popping.

Just copy and paste this into google:

building 7 head of secutity
Reply to this comment
by lawandorder7 August 8, 2007 12:56 PM EDT
Bull, The airline is wrong and they don't want to pay up. The airline did not do the job of making the people on borad safe. And the The two WTC Towers were NOT the worst built buildings in New York.
Reply to this comment
by mrhoppy-2009 August 8, 2007 12:50 PM EDT
The only positive thing about 911 is that the news media is being exposed for the liars and ****** that they are. America got an education as to how all wars of the last hundred years have started without exception.

Zionist puppets like Bill O'Reilly have to be filling their pants over this. Bill is part of the CIA's project mockingbird, placing propaganda agents in the media. Is lars008 really Lars Larson - a Nazi radio propagandist from Portland Oregon? Probably...

"The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the Major Media" -William Colby- Former CIA Director
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan August 8, 2007 12:32 PM EDT
Terrorists love defenseless victims.
That's why they knew they could use BOX CUTTERS to hijack planes and kill thousands on 9/11/01.
Self Defense:
A-HUMAN-RIGHT.com
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw August 8, 2007 12:19 PM EDT
How about the BBC broadcast airing the collapse of bldg 7? You can plainly see the building in the background as it was taped live.
Wasn't that where all the intellegence records were kept? Hmmm... Brings a lot of doubt to my mind...

Posted by kaiyo4u at 08:45 AM : Aug 08, 2007

There is no doubt in my mind.

I automatically rejected the legend of 9/11/01 when I heard the fairy tale that some guys who (allegedly) learned how to fly Cessnas jumped into the cockpits of large commercial jet aircraft and successfully navigated them hundreds of miles into specific targets.

I don't pretend to know what the truth is, or, if we will ever know the truth.

But, I do know that we are not being told the truth.
Reply to this comment
by kaiyo4u August 8, 2007 11:45 AM EDT
How about the BBC broadcast airing the collapse of bldg 7? You can plainly see the building in the background as it was taped live.
Wasn't that where all the intellegence records were kept? Hmmm... Brings a lot of doubt to my mind...
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw August 8, 2007 11:44 AM EDT
In reviewing many of the comments, it appears some are claiming there was no conspiracy to bring down the WTC.

Which begs the question that if there was no conspiracy, then what has OBL or "al quaida" have to do with it?

And, the fact remains that it would be virtually impossible for an inexperienced person to have piloted those aircraft in the manner described.

Flying from Boston to NYC and then into a specific target with a large commercial airliner is not a feat easily accomplished.

A feat beyond the ability of someone without extensive experience.

Or, without the aid of an electronic guidance system designed for that specific purpose. A system that would have required hours, days or weeks to have installed and tested.

The events of 9/11/01 did not occur as told in popular legend.
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 August 8, 2007 8:41 AM EDT
WTC
Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,284816,00.html
New Three-D study supports federal finding in 9-11 tragedy
http://www.fox19.com/Global/story.asp?S=6683593&nav=0zHF
Study Supports Fed's Finding On WTC Collapse
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=nation_world&id=5401655
Simulation Finds 9/11 Fireproofing Key
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4905202.html
Debunking The 9/11 Myths - Mar. 2005 Cover Story
PM examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
Reply to this comment
See all 153 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: