Comments on: 4 Charged In New York Airport Terror Plot

3 Suspects In Custody; Allegedly Planned To Attack JFK Airport Fuel Lines

[tuckerndfw]

tucker-let me guess. You just watched JFK again? I follow. The snoopin' around I did shows more than 1 shooter. And, I would venture to say, that some folks,closer to home, are the real beneficiaries of this misadventure in the ME.

Posted by drummer94 at 04:37 PM : Jun 03, 2007

I have never seen a movie about the assassination. My opinions are based on my own experiences with a Mannlicher rifle similar to the one allegedly used by Oswald.

Since it is not possible for that rifle to have been used in that manner, it's obvious Oswald did not act alone.

Jack Ruby silenced the only person who might have revealed the truth as he knew it. And, it's likely Oswald didn't know the whole truth since he was obviously a patsy for someone.

Given the fact Jack Ruby (nee Jacob Rubinstein) was an ardent Zionist, along with JFK's demands on Israel in the summer of 1963, it is fairly obvious that Israel was involved. The only question being to what extinct and who all within the Israeli government was involved.

If I had some way of proving the real truth, I would bet very heavily that Israel was directly responsible for JFK's assassination (and subsequent coverup) as well as being heavily involved in the events of 9/11/01.

Israel is the primary beneficiary of both operations.

[radiob-2009]

Tucker

Where is the proof of this conspiracy on JFK ?

[toolmangler-2009]

Purty gud reasonin' fer an old man, wot?

[tuckerndfw]

I am not knowledgeable enough about the JFK assassination to reach this conclusion, but it would not surprise me.

Posted by FeelFree1 at 04:37 PM : Jun 03, 2007

In November 1963, nearly everyone I knew owned at least one rifle, usually a military surplus rifle due to cost and availability (millions were on the market).

Someone within our group owned a Mannlicher much like the one allegedly used by Oswald. We attempted to fire that rifle in the manner described and it could not be done.

There is no possible way a Mannlicher was used to assassinate JFK in the manner described.

At that time, Israel's nuclear reactor was secret, so no one in the public was aware that JFK had issued ultimatums to Israel in the summer of 1963 that the reactor at Dimona not be used to produce nuclear weapons. And, that it be open for inspections.

Since JFK's assassination, no US president has made any similar demands on Israel and all US presidents seemingly jump when Israel barks. And Israel's nuclear reactor is being used to produce nuclear weapons and is not open to inspections.

Without invoking anything but pure logic and the "who benefits most" rule, it appears David Ben-Gurion (Israel) and his thugs were responsible for assassinating JFK.

Israel likewise was the primary beneficiary of the events of 9/11/01.

[toolmangler-2009]

If a structure is sheered at the bottom by a sideways blow and said structure has about half the weight of the Twins and that weight is dropped, oh say the thickness of one supporting floor (1 to 1 1/2 foot thick) there is logical supposition to think that the entire house would fall 'straight down'. I have more if you are interested. The shock of 110 stories of steel and concrete falling straight down would have the effect of an explosive device being set off in a tunnel and the force would move to the sides as defined by the basement structure.

[radiob-2009]

FeelFree1

From NIST itself on WT7 very plausable.

NIST has released video and still-photo analysis of Building 7 before its collapse that appears to indicate a greater degree of structural damage from falling debris than originally assumed by FEMA. Specifically, the NIST's interim report on 7 WTC displays photographs of the southwest ****** of the building that show it to have significant damage. The NIST interim report on 7 WTC details a 10-story gash that existed on the south ******, extending a third of the way across the face of the building and approximately a quarter of the way into the interior, but does not provide any photographs of the damage to the south ******.[2] A unique aspect of the design of 7 WTC was that each outer structural column was responsible for supporting 2,000 square feet (186 square meters) of floor space, suggesting that the simultaneous removal of a number of columns would severely compromise the structure's integrity. Consistent with this theory, news footage shows visible cracking and bowing of the building's east wall immediately before the collapse, which began at the penthouse floors.

[feelfree1]

radiob,

You took the time and effort to research SITE and IntelCenter?

Why are you so reluctant to invest your time in a 21 minute film on this topic?

[feelfree1]

radiob,

You took the time and effort to research SITE and IntelCenter?

Why are you so reluctant to invest your time in a 21 minute film on this issue?

[feelfree1]

radiob,

Re: "Who was it that made the ananlogy of cutting off two legs of a chair and how a chair falls?"

I did. WTC7- not hit by any plane.

Have you reviewed any of the films yet, or will you continue to argue from a position of ignorance, rather than challenge your own faulty and skewed pre-conceptions?

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5224963246223576086&q=%22third+stage%22

[radiob-2009]

Still going on Tool? Who was it that made the ananlogy of cutting off two legs of a chair and how a chair falls? Poor analogy to compare to the WTC centers. They were not hit at the bottom of the towers whereas a chair that was hit at the "bottom " would fall over.The towers were hit towards the top, the black smoke that billowed out of them was more than likely the result of a insulation fire. Tool you have worked in a Tool and Die shop every see one of these fires. The fire is so intense and hot, and visibility is nill inside the building.