Comments on: Was Family Plane Crash Deliberate?

Indiana Pilot And 8-Year-Old Daughter Were Killed When Plane Crashes Into Ex-Mother-In-Law's House

[erasmus6]

Agnim
I saw a movie years ago that took place in the future. Women were in control and the men were slaves. The men had collars around their necks and were tied to a center post (like they do with horses). They were called "DYNKS". The men were used to do the physical labor and for continuing the species. (ahhh and some of them can't even do that well) It was such a great movie. John Saxton was in it. I can't remember the name of it, but if I do I will let you know so you can maybe find it and watch it.

[susanhelit]

Funny idiot. Suuuuure, you can dominate - but you can't have a child by yourself. And when intelligence is the best weapon, as it is (just ask all the strong men at Hiroshima how much their strength mattered, or ask the dead lion donating his skin to a rug), which gender is physically stronger hardly matters.

Not that anyone who kills a child really wanted it - nor do they deserve it - as nearly every single man (and every single real man) agrees.

Funny how you contradict yourself - females are set up by nature to care for kids - and that's why you think men should get first call? Just spend a few more years working this philosophy out, because it just too obviously doesn't work.

[jc19611]

Males do DOMINANT the world in power,laws--law enforcement,money & government,etc. That is why there are wars,weapons (of MASS destruction),honor killings,child brides,rampant rapes/molestions, commerical breeding & torture of animals,torture of prisoners,poor (men,women & children), pollution,etc.,etc.,etc are tied into men's desires. I could go on & on--my point is these ARE NOT examples of protectors/true leaders or males who have mankind/humans/world's best interest at heart or in mind, BUT ARE EXPAMPLES OF MALE DOMINANCE. For males who go beyond male desires,they enforce & create laws to protect us all as they should. With that said, THAT IS WHY CUSTODY WAS GIVEN TO THE MOTHER-----the father & men like him should NOT have a lot of contact or control because they tend to inflict harm. Example,he & the child are dead----this shows the judges,laws & decisions were correct to limit contact in these cases IF THIS IS A SUCH A CASE.

[erasmus6]

" There would have been no reason to make females if not to continue the species (a vital role) because men can do everything else the world needs." posted by Agnim

Ok, you need to get a grip there, buddy. First of all, if men can do everything else the world needs, I have yet to see it. And because men are so concerned with the thing between their legs getting attention they don't have time to do everything else the world needs. And secondly, every woman knows that God screwed up when he created man and then made up for it by creating woman.

[agnim]

"Males who think they are purely and naturally dominant can try to have those children they want to kill all by themselves,

Posted by SusanHelit at 03:56 PM : Mar 06, 2007"
LOL
Why should men "try and have the children by themselves" when Mother Nature already provide males with a natural carrier who CANNOT resist playing their PRIMARY role of mother?
If a female is not a mother, her life (in the natural scheme of things) has been worth a lot less than intended.
There would have been no reason to make females if not to continue the species (a vital role); because men can do everything else the world needs!

[agnim]

"Romans took children at 12 years old from their mothers/homes

Children belong to mother & father, NOT the father.
Posted by jc19611 at 03:57 PM : Mar 06, 2007"

You are obviously contradicting yourself for; could the females (act like the males can) and take the children against the wishes of the males?

The males have super rights to the children and CAN enforce them; the females have only inferior rights, which the males may or may not allow!

That is how Mother Nature sets up things when she made the male the dominant gender and the female the submissive one. Tamper with that set up (in our ignorance and delusion) at our peril!

[agnim]

"If he loved her, if he cared for her at all, he would never have killed her.

Posted by SusanHelit at 03:32 PM : Mar 06, 2007"

LOL
That is so 'baby talk'.

As Tina would say, "What's love got to do with it?"

Men should have the right to their children and THEY should be the ones allowing the visitation, not the other way around!

When we create a FALSE situation of females even appearing to dictate to the DOMINANT MALES, it is never going to end nicely.
And we know who will get the chitty end of the stick MOST of the time, the female, right?

Only fools insistently go against the grain of nature.
Only fools make laws that contravene the way nature sets up things between male and females.

And fools are responsible when tragedies like these occur; 'cause like you unwittingly might conclude 'love' has NOTHING to do with it!

[susanhelit]

And these supposed 'men' - they don't want to have their children. If they did, they wouldn't kill them. They don't care in the least about their children, which means that they'd be the worst possible person to have them.

As wise men, and women, everywhere know, write into law, and enforce as police officers and individuals both.

[erasmus6]

j_flood- I did read the article. The point is that whether the media is speculating or the police are doesn't really matter. The media shouldn't be reporting speculation. They should be stating only the facts. "The plane has crashed and THE REASONS ARE UNKOWN AT THIS TIME" I am not says it isn't true but would you want to be known for murdering your daughter if it wasn't true? When people first hear things they quite often believe them to be true and they may never hear the true facts. There was a plane crash on the runway once and the media reported that it was thought to have happened a specific way and if that were the case everyone on board would be dead. Now meanwhile all the family members who are watching this on tv believe their son or daughter etc... are dead. It wasn't true. SPECULATING IS BAD!

[jc19611]

Romans took children at 12 years old from their mothers/homes & placed them in adult male armies. The children were molested & abused. GOD'S authority made women the carrier,nurturer & protector of children until adulthood with the added protection & guidance of a male (the father). Children belong to mother & father, NOT the father.