Comments on: Peace Sign A Symbol Of Satan?

Colo. Town Bans Christmas Wreath With Peace Sign; Some Call Sign Unpatriotic, Satanic

Add a Comment See all 107 Comments
by danimal50 November 27, 2006 4:28 PM EST
Keep your peaceful wreath up there in full view Ms Jensen. I would be pleased to help you with a portion of the monetary fine should one be levied.
In 1972, after returning from a year in Vietnam, there were those who were quite upset about the peace symbol I had on the back of my VW van. I kept my peace symbol on my van then and I hope you keep yours on your house now.
You are right ---- Peace IS way better than war, especially an unnecessary war, as Virtman was and as Iraq now is.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 27, 2006 4:26 PM EST
If there is a rule against "all signs" then she must take it down, but "all signs" must come down, not just the one's they disagree with..

This peace sign has been around for years, pardon my ignorance, but can someone tell me how and when it became a sign of the Devel or Saten?
Reply to this comment
by jvman4u November 27, 2006 4:22 PM EST
So TYPICAL of the POWER hungry-control freaks that get onto the homeowners boards, in South florida they even control what kind of car you can own, and weather your visitors cars are allowed onto their streets for a visit to your home... Ain't all this getting a bit out of hand, can't they find more important things to do with their time? NO! instead they have to scour and find TARGETS, and then assault them with hate, fines and unhappiness, when they could have just told "those 3-4 people that complained" to go back into their homes take the MEDICATIONS and mind their own damned business, that it wasn't listed as one of the rules, and wasn't hurting anyone...
Reply to this comment
by jairod November 27, 2006 4:17 PM EST
It is my understanding that neither a State, County, City, Municipality, nor any other organization can legislate away our Constitutional rights. The right to Free Speech is at issue in this case and that right must prevail. If someone wants to advertise to "Drop Bombs" in Iraq, that is their right as protected by the Constitution. The right to express that the Idea of "Dropping Bombs" on anybody is abhorent because of Religious ideals is also protected. That is the basis of argumentation: you take one side and I take the other. If you want to open the Bible and shake it in my face and tell me that it is against God's will to "Drop Bombs" on anybody, show me chapter and verse instead of trying to ram it down my throat: I will listen to you if you don't try to shove your Ideals dowm my throat. What civilized people do is discuss and consider. Accepting another's opinion without argumentation is stupid. When was the last time the people that oppose the Peace Sign in question sat with the person that put it up and discussed the whys and wherefores of that action?
Reply to this comment
by rlegg369 November 27, 2006 4:17 PM EST
To quote the Late, Great, John Lennon. "All we are saying, is give peace a chance."
Reply to this comment
by wadyaknow November 27, 2006 4:07 PM EST
Why don't the just up and fire Kearns.
What a jerk and what a bunch of goofs to say it is the devil's symbol. Even if this was the devil's sign that could still be construed as a personal religious choice. Heck - I think the "Pope" is a hate-monger.
Reply to this comment
by bobandladyjane November 27, 2006 4:05 PM EST
Oh My When he ( Kearns ) couldn't impose his will on five people in order to stop an act of PEACE he fires them. How BUSH-ESQUE of him. I'm so glad I don't live there.
Reply to this comment
See all 107 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (199 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: