Comments on: Nuclear Lab Breach Could Be 'Devastating'
CBS News Exclusive: Data Found In Drug Raid Contains Weapons-Design Secrets
- "I don't know why all you people keep focusing on Bush and all this other ***. The Presidency is just a temporary position. Do you really think a temporary position is making all of the decision? If so, I have some beach fornt property to sell you in Arizona. He is nothing more than a head for people to blame. Open your eyes.
And towards the person who commented on my comment about the Q clearences. I never said just because they do alot of backgorund checks everything will be ok. All I was saying that they do alot to ensure people who have Qs should have them, and just because someone has one does not mean they will not do something wrong. What Jessica did was very wrong, but it is nto the process of the FBI's fault. " - Reply to this comment
- qazxswqwer, while you have your head in there, would you mind looking around, then Bush wouldn't need a colonoscopy.
- Reply to this comment
- Secretary of Energy Bodman was sworn in on Feb. 1, 2001. He was appointed by Bush and serves at Bush's pleasure as do his appointees managing the investigation and issuance of clearances. Somehow the drug trailer's owner still had a "Q" clearance. The logic involved in blaming Clinton fails the laugh test. The best argument for absolving Bush of the blame for his administration's failings is that he is not competent enough to intentionally recruit so many people as, or more incompetent than, he.
With an information system from this century, there is no need provide the means to copy data to any removable drives or storage media at the user level.
The amount and type of data that could be removed from Los Alamos without causing pockets to bulge is enough to scare people ****less, yet our blamer-in-chief thinks he must manufacture stuff about opponents to try to scare people. It goes back to the competence, or lack thereof, stuff.
Finally, Bush enunciates most words so clearly that his mauling of the word "nuclear" must be a cutesy affectation. It can't be that he really is dumb as dirt, can it? - Reply to this comment
- Secretary of Energy Bodman was sworn in on Feb. 1, 2001. He was appointed by Bush and serves at Bush's pleasure as do his appointees managing the investigation and issuance of clearances. Somehow the drug trailer's owner still had a "Q" clearance. The logic involved in blaming Clinton fails the laugh test. The best argument for absolving Bush of the blame for his administration's failings is that he is not competent enough to intentionally recruit so many people as, or more incompetent than, he.
With an information system from this century, there is no need provide the means to copy data to any removable drives or storage media at the user level.
The amount and type of data that could be removed from Los Alamos without causing pockets to bulge is enough to scare people ****less, yet our blamer-in-chief thinks he must manufacture stuff about opponents to try to scare people. It goes back to the competence, or lack thereof, stuff.
Finally, Bush enunciates most words so clearly that his mauling of the word "nuclear" must be a cutesy affectation. It can't be that he really is dumb as dirt, can it? - Reply to this comment
- dear qazxsquer or whatever your name is. All I know is your loser biddies will be on their way out of office come weds morn. Good f**kin luck pal!!
- Reply to this comment
- Also, all of you people are forgetting that LANL has a management unit. Bush is not managing the site. All of you Democrat *** riding *** *** need to pull your mouth off the nipple and open your eyes.
- Reply to this comment
- I don't know why all you people keep focusing on Bush and all this other ***. The Presidency is just a temporary position. Do you really think a temporary position is making all of the decision? If so, I have some beach fornt property to sell you in Arizona. He is nothing more than a head for people to blame. Open your eyes.
And towards the person who commented on my comment about the Q clearences. I never said just because they do alot of backgorund checks everything will be ok. All I was saying that they do alot to ensure people who have Qs should have them, and just because someone has one does not mean they will not do something wrong. What Jessica did was very wrong, but it is nto the process of the FBI's fault. - Reply to this comment
- If there was a revolution now between the right and the left. Which side would have sexual deviants and those that will cover them up, are also into torture and taking pictures of it, has all incorrect intelligence, can't balance a budget, and wont enlist into an army?
Think that side would win? - Reply to this comment
- Henry,
I admire your staying the course with blaming Clinton. Guy, he was 6 years ago. It's time to put the blame where it belongs. After your friend W is out, do you have any idea how long we are going to blame him for the world's problems like you do Clinton? Because, um, he's caused a bit of a mess, - Reply to this comment
- Says Cheney: "What's news is if there's bad news, and that gets coverage," he said. "But the good news that's out there day after day after day, doesn't get as much attention."
Um, Richard(ha), Giving away nuclear weapons "secrets" may tend to get a little air time. Especially, when on the same day, it comes to light, you've received money froma drug using deviants who profess to be a moral majority, and donations from Tom Noe(R)from Ohio who resigned today.
Richard's played W like a puppet. Poor George, he wasn't in the same league. - Reply to this comment




