113 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
moral_threat says:
Just look at their "demands" just try not to we yourself from laughter.

http://www.zazzle.com/not_the_change_bumper_sticker-128582124763668210
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
editorial-comment says:
I'd trade a million protesters for one Tim Mcveigh on Wall Street. I say fight Fertilizer with fertilizer!
reply
moral_threat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@ GOP - You need to wake up and realize how many part of the Constitution have violated by the Obama administration. It's not just the GOP that is the problem, it's both parties.

http://www.zazzle.com/not_the_change_bumper_sticker-128582124763668210
linkicon reporticon emailicon
greenelent says:
photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/greenelent/sets/72157627831596694/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pucksatonyfill says:
There comes a time in society when the wealth becomes so concentrated to the few at the top and the access to power and the decision making process becomes impossible that the masses rise up. That time is approaching us and without real change we are embarking on a treacherous course in our history. The French Revolution happened in a similar fashion and the years that followed were bloody and the rich were not spared.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CaymanDiver says:
I think they should boycott ALL the products and services "big greedy corporations" produce or render!! That would show 'em!! Let's start with the telecommunications industry, computer manufactures, the clothing industry, auto makers, financial services, airlines, big oil (and little oil!), utility companies traded on the exchange, broadcast news and entertainment, pharmaceutical companies, fast food companies, tobacco companies, etc, etc... Oh my, the list goes on and on!

You've got to hit them where it hurts and that's in the pocket book. Cut their revenue streams! Standing around on the street is not going to cut it! Boycott Now!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
usmcjmills October 6, 2011 1:37 PM EDT
1) I was there and i took time off from work. MY VACATION time to attend. I paid 100% on my own and everyone I know who went also did the same. I saw NO unions and no organization except by dedicated people who spread the word. They also recieve no compensation for doing this. Prove your words you called me a liar now prove your words are the truth.
-------------------------------------------
You attended nothing. You are here funded by the KOCHs. Traitor and Liar. You bid for monarchy. You are a traitor to the american revolution and the fight against monarchic and oligarchic rule.
reply
usmcjmills replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Wow you love calling people liars and making unsubstaniated claims like "you never attended" but yet refuse to prove your own words. With you as the front man for your revolution i say bring it on I need a good laugh.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
KnowerseekerReturns October 6, 2011 12:54 PM EDT
Not to mention that at least one is a business owner.
----------------------------------------------

A piece of sh*t wanna be tyrant. Do you have Mexican indentured servants doing the work? Living off the labor of others? Democracy produces wealthy individuals but if you have the dream of being a tyrant like Mubarak..Democracy is not your friend.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
usmcjmills October 6, 2011 12:56 PM EDT
Pretty well said you proved you can write. Though you still can't read.

The Tea Party already marched on washington and with NO arrests, NO citations, NO public disobediance, and NO unions paying people to be there. Unlike this flash mob who is the exact oposite of the Tea Party marches.
--------------------------------------------

YOU LIE. The biggest union of them all that represents the collective interests of non-democratic global corporate governments funded along with the KOCH monarchy the tea bagging fools.
reply
notyrants replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The biggest Union of them all... The so called United States Chamber of Commerce were involved along with the KOCH monarchy in funding the tea baggers.
usmcjmills replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1) I was there and i took time off from work. MY VACATION time to attend. I paid 100% on my own and everyone I know who went also did the same. I saw NO unions and no organization except by dedicated people who spread the word. They also recieve no compensation for doing this. Prove your words you called me a liar now prove your words are the truth.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notyrants says:
Amerinews October 6, 2011 1:12 PM EDT
I don't care who the socialist is what they call their cause, I am displeased with them all. Before any affiliation with any group or party, I am an American, one that will not go down to socialist quietly.
--------------------------------------

YOU LIE, you are the kind that practice injustice in your daily life. The antitheses of the american revolution is your kind. The media...all of them. MSNBC, CNN, corporate network phony news and of course FOX handled the tea baggers much differently than this. This is more real and the way the reporters are reporting demonstrates this. They are worried about themselves whereas they enjoyed contrived sensationalism around the Koch funded tea bag movement.
reply
usmcjmills replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You call Amerinews a liar too? At least I'm in good company.
Hey Amerinews we should let this guy be the mouth piece for his revolution it would provide many months of entertaining television. It would be so funny to listen to this ignorant twit.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RandomPost says:
I see a lot of people saying that the protestors gathering to protest Wall Street Practices and Government Bailouts are socialist and unAmerican, that this is class warfare. So when the TEA Party gathered together to protest Wall Street Practices and Government Bailouts, were they socialist too? Were they inciting class warfare, did they hate America. Afterall if you look at the signs and the messages both groups have more in common then differences. While Wall Strret has had its aggressive moment, remember when TEA party members starting waving guns around at town hall meetings and put cross hairs on the heads of people they didn't like. When people get angry on the left, right, or middle, the act angry, which is just the way it is.

So is it if you protest and you are over 45, that is acting on your first amendment right, and you are a patriot; but if your protest has an average age under 45, you are just a lazy whiner who hates the country. Basically left and right are sort of emerging more and more like hypocrites because they are afraid of agreeing with people they thought they disagreed with.

And for those of you angry because people are assembling to voice their grievences, ask yourself why do hate the Constitution so much? Its a shame that we live in a country where we get all up in arms if somebody tries limit the Second Amendment but we cry bloody murder if group of citizens actually engage in their First Amendment rights.
reply
Amerinews replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I don't care who the socialist is what they call their cause, I am displeased with them all. Before any affiliation with any group or party, I am an American, one that will not go down to socialist quietly.
RandomPost replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Americnews: So you are blind jingoistic moron, that probably couldn't given an accurate definition of Socialism if there was a gun to your head. Furthermore, you probably couldn't formulate a clear connection of how either the the TEA Party or the Wall Street Protest could even be construed as Socialist in an accurate manner. But I am sure, true to your ideals, you never took part in public eductation, never served in the military, never claimed a tax deduction, never recieved accepted FDIC insurance on any of your investments, and never plan to collected social security, medicaid, or medicare. Because otherwise you would also be a hypocrite, because those technically all could be considered socialist programs.
AVRWEBGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RandomPost: less the insults.... you took the words right out of my mouth. Whenever Americans fly the anti-socialist flag they never seem to realize what socialism really is. It's not just a political party. Most laws that protect the people are basically socialist. Frankly I find the Fascist tendencies of late to be much more frightening than Social Security, Medicare, Public Schools, Unemployment Insurance, Consumer Protection, No Child Left Behind, and on and on... Enough with the Socialism sound bites already..
usmcjmills replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Socialism, according to Karl Marx, is the transition between capitalism and communism. To achieve communism, Marx says, there must be continuing revolution in which the fundamental principal is: The end justifies the means.

Obama has declared that he believes every person has a "right" to health care. The Socialist Party USA believes every person has a "right" to health care.

Obama believes that labor unions should be allowed to organize without a secret ballot. The Socialist Party USA calls for unions to be recognized without a secret ballot. (Hear Obama's words here.)

The Socialist Party USA recognizes the "right" of adequate housing for everyone. Obama trained ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) workers to secure mortgages for unqualified people in sufficient numbers to collapse the housing and home-financing industries.

The Socialist Party USA believes that "capitalism is fundamentally incompatible" with socialism. For years, Obama worked in Chicago through the Annenberg Challenge, along with Bill Ayers, to funnel more than $50 million to anti-capitalist education projects. In November 2006, Ayers traveled to Venezuela to speak at Hugo Chavez's Education Forum where he railed against "the failings of capitalist education," and praised the "Bolivarian Revolution and the profound reforms in education made by Hugo Chavez."

The Socialist Party USA believes in open borders and six-months residency as the only requirement for U.S. citizenship. Obama marched with illegal aliens in Chicago in support of "comprehensive" immigration reform. Listen to Obama's promises to La Raza in 2007.

The Socialist Party USA calls for an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. Obama says, "I will end this war," with never a reference to "winning" or "victory."

The Socialist Party USA calls for the "unconditional disarmament" by the United States. Obama has promised to dramatically reduce defense spending. Listen to his words here.

The Socialist Party USA calls for a "livable guaranteed annual income." Obama trained ACORN members to conduct "Living Wage" campaigns in cities around the country.

The Socialist Party USA calls for a "steeply graduated" tax policy to redistribute wealth. Obama has promised to increase the tax burden on the rich to redistribute wealth to the poor. He revealed his philosophy when answering a question from Joe the plumber, who complained that he was being taxed for his success. Obama said:

It's not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they've got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.
This list of comparisons could be quite long. This is sufficient to reveal an unmistakable similarity between Obama's political beliefs and the beliefs of the Socialist Party USA. The tragedy is that Obama's supporters don't care. In fact, many of his supporters are delighted that he promises to usher in a new era of socialism, and push the memory of capitalism further into history.

Socialists, who are in perpetual revolution, who believe that the end justifies the means, have worked through educational institutions, non-government organizations such as ACORN and by electing socialists to public office to silence teaching the virtues of free enterprise, capitalism, private property, individual responsibility and personal achievement. For nearly two generations, students have been fed a steady diet of socialism under a variety of disguises, including Outcome Based Education, No Child Left Behind, School-to-Work and a host of other "feel good" slogans.

Students and young adults no longer know why capitalism is better than socialism. Like Obama, young people really believe that when government redistributes wealth, "it's good for everybody." They do not realize that wealth redistribution is no substitute for wealth creation. They are never taught that the only way to create wealth is for an individual to combine his energy and intellect with resources to produce a product that improves his life, or for which someone else is willing to pay.

Private property, the accumulation of personal prosperity and individual achievement are anathema to socialism. Socialism sees the individual as nothing more than a cog in a government-run machine designed to ensure equity for all.

Capitalism seeks prosperity; socialism seeks equity. Freedom increases as prosperity increases. In a socialist system, there can be neither.
1/4