Consider this: A new 30 minute video has surfaced on Yahoo showing firemen inspecting the Pentagon damage inside the building. There is no sign of an incredibly intense fire and and no no sign of a 757 that should have been consumed by it. Where did the hijackers get a cruise missile? The Pentagon story is a lie, so what about the rest of the 9/11 story? The bad news is that the criminals who perpetrated this are still free.
There's an excellent documentary out called Conspiracy Rising that examines both sides of the 9/11 argument and discusses the psychology behind why conspiracy theories are so appealing to some people. For anyone looking for an informative, neutral, and empirically-based documentary on 9/11 and numerous other conspiracy theories, I encourage you to check it out. It's currently premiering in a pretty known film festival: http://exhibition.thefreestylelife.com/conspiracy-rising.html
Who could coordinate the "Joshua Normans" of contemporary journalism to cover-up the 9/11 lies? Who could keep the Congress from a real investigation? Who could manipulate NIST, FEMA, FBI, CIA and heads of state to parrot the official lies of 9/11?
Yes, isn't it incredible that these journalists get away with this kind of manipulation? I wonder what pressure Joshua Norman is under. He cannot possibly be that dull witted, and that poorly trained, to have come up with this after investigating the issue. He completely, COMPLETELY, ignores the most critical elements of the 9/11 Truth Movement's arguments against the official story. More generally, he misses the whole point of the truther movement..............it is not about truthers and THEIR conspiracy theories, but instead, it is about the lies, fabrications, embellishments, contradictions, and impossibilities of the official story. He knows this. But his mission here, as I'm sure he was commanded, is to mock and humiliate the truther movement. We know this, of course. What we must begin to realize is that this is a high crime............Joshua Norman is a criminal. While some may want, desperately, to bring people like Cheney and Wolfowitz and Bush to trial and justice, I want to see criminal journalists like Joshua Norman squirm on the hot seat in a trial in which he is tried and convicted of criminal treasonous conspiracy to lie to the American people and help cause the deaths of millions.
The one fact the the government believers never talk about is how the towers fell. This cannot be disputed(unless you live on another planet). The gravity here on earth is constant no matter the size, shape, and height. The same force of gravity is applied to EVERYTHING on earth. If the towers fell as it is claimed by the goverment, then why did the towers fall at near free fall speed(the speed at which an object falls due to gravity) which is about 10 seconds? This means that NOTHING came in the way of the not 1, not 2, but 3 tall buidlings on the same day. The buildings fall very near the same speed as a bowling ball being dropped from the top of the WTC, how is this possible by weakened steel as it is claimed. The so called weakened steel could have cause the towers to collapse but would of take 30 seconds or more for the whole building to reach the ground because of the resistance by the other floors, debris, and stuff inside the buidlings. The ONLY way that ALL THREE buildings can be collapsed and reach the ground by the force of gravity is by NO resistance, meaning the floors have already gave way before the start of the collapse. AND THIS IS ONLY POSSIBLE BY USE OF A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
Furthermore, it has not been mentioned very much(not a coincidence). But remember the video from Bush sitting in the classroom being told America is under attack? Well has is it that the US is under attack but NOT ONE secret service person secures the president as outlined in the job description. If the US is under attack by a surprise, the first thing they should of done was rip him out of the classroom as brought him to a undislosed secure location IMMEDIATELY, but that did not happen, he just sat there listening to reading while AMERICA WAS UNDER ATTACK.
Actually, WTC 1 and 2 fell at closer to 2/3 of freefall, despite what NIST reported (around 10 seconds each). Even that was way too fast and way too symmetrical, assuming they should have fallen at all.
But WTC 7 fell at free fall for the first 2.25 seconds. NIST wanted to hide this fact at first, but were forced to admit it. Their model for the collapse is not consistent with free fall.
How is this guy an associate editor? I'm confused. This article wouldn't get a good grade in any respectable journalism class. There is absolutely no critical thinking involved here. He has an agenda which is apparent but he uses poor references, i.e. popular mechanics, to support it. He uses the government's official version as his other source. Really? He then creates a loose correlation between truthers and greed. Because people who seek the truth want to make a lot of money and there is evidence to support that where? Oh , you don't have a reference for that. His arguments are baseless. Whether you believe the govt or question 9/11 this guy sucks as a journalist.
Where did the truther screwballs come from? Bill Clinton was elected president the first time around with 43% of the vote, the same exact percentage of Americans that believe in UFO's, (flying saucers). Now, take a guess where the truthers came from.
Ladies, and gentlemen, this is the same 'bought and paid-for' media bashing people like Ron Paul for things like individual liberty. Questioning major events should be alive and healthy in a truly free society. Deal with it.
All of the weird cover-ups, and mysteriously magical things that happened that day, including WTC 7 should raise an eyebrow in anyone with any ounce of thought. There is zero evidence pointing towards how the official story unfolded, and to trust it without question is blasphemy, and dangerous.
Uh funny how they always rely on "popular mechanics"...Why don't we mention how hilarious the governments version of 9/11 is and how they illegally destroyed all of the evidence and stonewalled/delayed the investigation as long as possible...then Bush and his cronies wouldn't cooperate with the investigation team members nor listen or include thousands of eye witness testimonies of bombs going off everywhere...you can try and belittle the truth movement but until the questions are answered it will continue to grow!!!! And as far as flight 93 goes...Rumsfeld already spilled the beans on that one...Neither has the government sufficiently explained why NO VIDEO of pentagon attack...nor why the protocol changes in NORAD, nor why nobody has been officially charged for the attacks including Bin Laden, nor how building 7 went down, etc etc...the list of unanswered questions is growing longer...time for the government to come clean...their silence is a smoking gun...a huge elephant in the room!!!
Yeah, what's also funny is how literally all conspiracy theorists can rely on in their position against Popular Mechanics in this time is repeated condemnation of it being used as a source. The justification? David Ray Griffin's response to their original book. Have you seen the contestation? A majority say no, and have shown that they are not interested. They attack anything that contradicts the conspiracy theory in large numbers, discouraging others from looking at the real truth. They'll wait for the next of Griffin's responses for satisfaction, and show their support.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
ReDiscover911 dot COM
It wasn't muslims (Google this phrase)
Furthermore, it has not been mentioned very much(not a coincidence). But remember the video from Bush sitting in the classroom being told America is under attack? Well has is it that the US is under attack but NOT ONE secret service person secures the president as outlined in the job description. If the US is under attack by a surprise, the first thing they should of done was rip him out of the classroom as brought him to a undislosed secure location IMMEDIATELY, but that did not happen, he just sat there listening to reading while AMERICA WAS UNDER ATTACK.
But WTC 7 fell at free fall for the first 2.25 seconds. NIST wanted to hide this fact at first, but were forced to admit it. Their model for the collapse is not consistent with free fall.
Bill Clinton was elected president the first time around with 43% of the vote, the same exact percentage of Americans that believe in UFO's, (flying saucers).
Now, take a guess where the truthers came from.
All of the weird cover-ups, and mysteriously magical things that happened that day, including WTC 7 should raise an eyebrow in anyone with any ounce of thought. There is zero evidence pointing towards how the official story unfolded, and to trust it without question is blasphemy, and dangerous.