Comments on: At The Supreme Court It's Kennedy's World
The High Court's Docket This Year Offers Major Cases Likely To Be Decided By One Man
- In any current discussion about the Supreme Court, there is a message for all the good "independent" voters out there -- the ones who (1)voted for Bush in 2004, then saw the light in 2006 and (2)were so engrossed in their "middle-of-the-road" stance prior to 2004 that they allowed the Democratic Party elites to come up with a lack-luster candidate like John Kerry.
And that message is this: We have the horrificly conservative court we have today because you sat on the fence all those years (there is the Iraq war, too, but that''s another subject).
Get off the dime! Get active in (hopefully) progressive politics, and use this example to teach your kids that the appointment power of the president can affect the course of our government for decades beyond his/her tenure. - Reply to this comment
- The "Liberal Media" is good that its liberal. They do their job digging at politicians of both parties and independants. If not for them, we''d not known the truths about the illegal constitution breaking by the GOP white house, or the GOP politically motivated acts by the Justice department, the Illegal election fraud by the GOP that many have gone to jail for now, or the No bid contracts wasting our money going to Halliburton, (Cheney''s company) and all its Subsidiaries and front companies overcharging for the same services to our tax money, Or the Truth about how Iraq was going, instead of the load of SH*T the white house keeps tossing at us, or all the Immoral crimes of financial theft or se xual perversion by the GOP politicians that People like XLib down there support whole heartedly. Or especially the Reverend Ted Haggard the GOP Link to the Evangelicals seeking homose xual prostitution and illegal drugs while married, meeting with Bush, and leading the Evangelical church to the pits, now hes asking for more money. Nice. Good Job Liberal media, Keep doing your job!
- Reply to this comment
- The COURTS ARE CORRUPT
JUSTICE is FOR SALE
either in the COURTS or by the POLITICIANS
If you want JUSTICE you better
know the MAGIC WORDS
and put them on the MAGIC PAPER
or have $$$$$$$$$
On the US SUPREME COURT BUILDING
it reads
EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL
QUESTIONS PRESENTED to the
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT in
Veasaw v. Domingues,et al.
No: 05-1467
1) Are State and Federal Employees IMMUNE to commit CRIMES against the PEOPLE in order to GAIN the upper hand in a Court Case or Administrative investigation and/or Process , without any fear of RETRIBUTION in the COURTS?
2) Are FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS accessible by All Citizen for whom the programs were designed for, or are they just really WORK PROGRAMS designed to give CRONIES and BUREAUCRATS high paying Jobs?
3) Must the citizens of this country PASS LITERARY TESTS in order to receive PROTECTION in the COURTS
(i.e. say the "MAGIC WORDS" for justice)
(i.e. put the "MAGIC WORDS" on " MAGIC PAPER ")?
4) Are theses laws CONSTITUTIONAL, If these laws are not EQUALLY apply to ALL (STATE, FEDERAL, CORPORATE)?
5) I think (are) ALL of you ARE CORRUPT ?
6) CAN THE PETITIONER GET MORE JUSTICE WITH A $10 BOX OF AMMO, THAN WHAT CAN EVER BE FOUND IN ALL THE CORRUPT UNITED STATES COURT ROOMS.?
=
You can see the US SUPREME COURT
didn''t think HONEST GOVERNMENT was important
EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL??? - Reply to this comment
- The utter arrogance and smugness of the liberal media. How about a few words on ruth bader ginsberg,sitting on the board of the aclu and still gets in.
It does appear that the media and libs in general will settle for nothing but a liberal supreme court. How is that right on any level?
Interesting that the libs see no problem with a liberal supreme court setting the tone of the country-what''s right, what''s wrong, looking to European law for guidance. Sweet.
I must thank the liberal court for passing the ruling on eminent domain, before Roberts and Aileto. That was so nice. - Reply to this comment
- Oh, for the days of Sandra O''Conner....
- Reply to this comment
- "It is the official, considered position of the state of Texas that President Bush is a constitutionally ignorant power-grabber.
Posted by PollM at 10:41 AM : Oct 01, 2007"
Not so''s you''d notice. Texans are quite supportive of President Bush. - Reply to this comment
- With a conservative court in place will the Supreme Court entitle President Bush to more Power Grabbing authorities.
It is the official, considered position of the state of Texas that President Bush is a constitutionally ignorant power-grabber.
Do you believe the President / Executive Branch have powers to vacate court rulings? ----- http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=614 - Reply to this comment
- If their crimes warrents the death penalty, then I would hardly think what they want matters. They should have considered the consequences before committing the crime.
Firing squads have proven very effective in the past as have guillotines. Especially guillotines. - Reply to this comment
- ". . Forget the hullabaloo over Justice Thomas. . "
wish we could forget about the whole joke of the "Supremes" Court.
Anyway, to bad we can''t comment on the KKKlarence Thomas story. - Reply to this comment
- sparks224, I absolutely agree.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




