Add a Comment
- Compared to the toils, support, and lives lost by their serfs, their peasant-slaves, and other of their subject exploitees, these royal parasites have NOT earned what they have unjustly accumulated.
By putting these royal parasites to hard labour, only an infinitesimal portion of their right to be free, would be paid back. - Reply to this comment
- I think it's very annoying to talk about people as if they are a commodity. Somebody may argue that the Royal Family IS a commodity, and I suppose you could look at it that way. Maybe. But it's mostly annoying. They are PEOPLE first of all. If the royals are a commodity then so are we all, trying to convince others that we have something to offer.
I think it annoys me MOSTLY because the concept infers MONEY. It's all about money. And how shallow is THAT? Who wants to be put on the level of BRANDS such as peanut butter and potato chips. People are worth a lot more than BRANDS. I think it's a very derogatory way to refer to People.
Maybe it applies with Kim Kardashian though. - Reply to this comment
- Well thank you everyone. These must be the most sad and bitter, whining, stupid comments I've read for quite a long time. Congratulations. You all win the brain-dead moron of the week award.
- Reply to this comment
- It's time to put these royal parasites to work.
These elitist abusers of 'expendable commoners' - who we made rich and powerful - are the cause of Hundreds of Millions of our ancestors' grief, poverty, suffering, sacrifice and deaths.
These royal parasites should be stripped of their wealth, influence and power, and put to hard labour, and if they give us any trouble, then - as THEY have done to Millions throughout history - off with their heads! - Reply to this comment
- I'd like to have been born English, .... free health care, a foreskin, and a fabulous Queen.
- Reply to this comment
- My My ...picky comments ... or what ...
- Reply to this comment
- Please fact check you guys. Queen Elizabeth's reign did NOT begin at her coronation at Westminster Abbey. By the time that ceremony was held, she had already been Queen for a year. The rules of succession and accession are perfectly clear. The moment a Sovereign is declared dead, or otherwise leaves the throne, his or her heir apparent/presumptive IMMEDIATELY becomes the new Sovereign. The formalities that follow, namely the proclamation in London, the Accession Council, and the Coronation, are ceremonies that are part of the process, but however counterintuitive it may sound, the Queen Elizabeth was already Queen when the Archbishop of Canterbury put that crown on her head.
With this in mind, she is not beginning the 60th year of her reign, but rather the 61st. 60 full years have passed, and she is now a third of the way through year 61. - Reply to this comment
- Why would Americans care...and the royals are a royal mess, actually, except for the global media and its infactuation with royalty. The Brits have been in more wars bar none than any other country of its size, or any other size...and only the new age globalists would state they have a "brand." The Brits need any excuse for a party, and the Queen is their excuse this time. I mean what else is there to do in rainy London, anyway?
- Reply to this comment
- That`s how you put on a show. Welsh but royalist. Sorry about Cliff ... but Tom rocked. Come and pay Wales a visit as you pass through. x
- Reply to this comment
- Hey Queen Elizabeth, ISIS want's her crown back.
- Reply to this comment
