Comments on: Troopergate Still Hounds Palin
CBS Evening News: Witness Refusals To Answer Subpoenas The Latest Development In Corruption Probe
- YOU ARE PATHETIC TOO, I DONT NEED TO SEE A PARTICULSR VIDEO OF OBAMA , TO REALIZE THAT HE TALKS IN TONGS IN ALL OF THEM, AND EVEN IN TOGS HE WILL GO BACK AND CORRECT HIS SELF IF THE MEDIA THINKS THAT HE DONT SUPPOST SOUD LIKE THAT, AND THE PEAPLE IS NOT GOING TO LIKE IT, HE WILL MAKE A DIFERENT SOUD AND EVERY BODY WILL BE HAPPY
- Reply to this comment
- The mayfery. Back and forth, back and forth. Just like The Camp May ferry in Delaware. Stick to the issue. Sarah has some explaining to do. Not only about troopergate, but about the 41 gifts she has received from lobbyists. Do you still hear a joke coming? I hear that joke as well. It''s Sarah Palin. ''Ta.
- Reply to this comment
- Does this mean that in the US if someone is appointed to a position anywhere and it''s later found out that they''ve got ''form'', you lambast anyone who tries to investigate them? Or does it mean that someone wants to shield Palin and kill a rightful process?
- Reply to this comment
- I HEAR A JOKE TOO : WHY IS OBAMA CONSIDERING TO GROW AN AFRO?
ANSWER:
SO THAT HIS HEAD WILL LOOK BIGGER, BECAUSE ALOT OF PEAPLE IS REALIZING THAT HE HAS A TINY BRAIN !!!!!! - Reply to this comment
- To paraphrase a blonde joke I once heard: Why does Sarah Palin wear that topknot hairstyle? Answer: To hide her valve stem!
- Reply to this comment
- The more we learn about Palin, the more we "listen" to her, the more witchcraft radical thinking religious views, the more "gifts" she and Todd accepted, the more "favors" they did for their "friends", the more she "fired" people who just didn''t agree with her, the more she opens her mouth and stupidity spews forth, the more lies and cover ups perpetrated by herself and mcsame, the more we know how totally unfit these two are for anything let alone the highest office in this country!
- Reply to this comment
- fairbalance2~ one thing to add about liberals, liberals do not want a candidate that is "just like them", they don''t really want a candidate who acts like they do, they really don''t want a candidate who pretends that being pro-life makes them family oriented, or that invoking God makes them Christians. They want a candidate who is smarter, who is more intelligent, who is better educated and knows what he is doing. Liberals do not have a narrow definition of what is Christian or Godly or ethical. They think and do not have to depend on someone else to tell them what to believe.
- Reply to this comment
- Pain Tribute...
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1831461 - Reply to this comment
- Posted by fairbalance2 at 09:56 PM : Sep 28, 2008
Liberals do not choose underqualified, undereducated, and underexperinced candidates. If you would look at all the presidential and vice presidential candidates that the Democrats have run in the last 6 elections, all have had above average educational and experience qualifications. Consequently, they have no compunction about supporting them. Even when they choose one for a particular political reason, such as why Palin was chosen, that candidate must have the qualifications to perform the job.
================
It must be impossible for a neo-con to come up with an original thought. you can''t even think of an original user-name. - Reply to this comment
- I REALLY liked the part about how Tina Fey used, verbatim, Palin''s crazyast rambling response to the bail-out question. "...it''s all about job creation!" Wow, Funny...
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by fairbalance2 at 09:56 PM : Sep 28, 2008
Liberals do not choose underqualified, undereducated, and underexperinced candidates. If you would look at all the presidential and vice presidential candidates that the Democrats have run in the last 6 elections, all have had above average educational and experience qualifications. Consequently, they have no compunction about supporting them. Even when they choose one for a particular political reason, such as why Palin was chosen, that candidate must have the qualifications to perform the job. - Reply to this comment
- ...if Palin would have been a liberal...
Posted by fairbalance2 at 09:56 PM : Sep 28, 2008
If your gramma had wheels she''d be a wagon. And, yes, that makes more sense than what you posted. - Reply to this comment
- Does anyone know what type of cheese to serve with a sour Republican wine?????
- Reply to this comment
- Another left wing take on the election, if Palin would have been a liberal they would be cheer leading like they have for the last 18 months for Obama! What a shame that the American press can on longer be trusted! l
- Reply to this comment
- it seems some people cannot have respect for others that disagree with them and that''s sad.
just adding that in reviewing history there has never been a less qualified candidate for vice president in the entire history of this country.
maybe i take that back!
george bush is probably the most unqualified to lead this country but palin is rapidly showing she''s definitely in his league.
be sure to have your blackberry with you Ms Palin when you debate, but try to be a little more subtle about using it. cause you did very poorly with couric.
it was obviously you were either reading prepared answers to possible questions from notes or somebody was texting you what to say.
don''t believe it?
watch her face and eyes and you''ll see it too.
and the look on couric''s face was just as amusing watching her try to interview her.
she has not concept of what it takes to lead this country and people talked about on the job training for obama! just imagine it with her in office and something happens to mcsame?
hah!
pity the poor republicans having to support her as their candidate. and i bet the heirarchy of their party are plenty sore at mcsame for his choice
here''s a great idea.....
let''s tie social security in with the stock market! - Reply to this comment
- I like the part about how her lack of transparency lets people see right through her.
- Reply to this comment
- McCain wants to reward the CEO''s of the failed Wall St. firms with billions as part of his 300 billion tax-cut to the wealthiest 1% of America
McCain & Bush was responsible for the biggest foreign policy blunder of modern time == That''s because if you add up his JUDGEMENT + VISION = ZERO
His so called experience was as useless when it came to make descition about Afganisgtan and making a descision do go to IRAQ == His experience is nothing but worthless washington seasoning.
Hes utter lack o judgement made him choose a VP candidate who is stupid enought to insult Americans'' ingtelligent sahing her ability to see Russia from home is a valid foreign policy experience. Thats not all she has a D in ECONOMICS to back up hare resume to solve our economic poroblem.
SO, McCAIN/FALIN supporters if you are for a president with ZERO VISION ans ZERO JUDGEMENT ans a VP as STUPID as FALIN, by all means vote for them......to prove you are the fools who is making America dumber every election year, as you have done electing an idiot (Bush) twice.
Only an hypocrite would want to support that policy. - Reply to this comment
- If you steal a car, you go to jail.
If you steal $1 trillion, you get support from the U.S. government.
Posted by whatithink1
let me help you out here.." if you steal a car and "GET CAUGHT'' you go to jail..many politicians lie , cheat and steal..it'';s common..what is uncommon is that they do not get caught. - Reply to this comment
- If you like cows and you were a frend you get a top level job.BULLSHI!
- Reply to this comment
- gwjackie,
If you steal a car, you go to jail.
If you steal $1 trillion, you get support from the U.S. government. - Reply to this comment




