Comments on: Israel Prodding U.S. To Attack Iran

White House Weighs Striking Iran's Nuclear Complex, Which Could Trigger 3rd War In Region

Add a Comment See all 1833 Comments
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 6:02 PM EDT
Posted by steinmeir02

i did 27 years in the Forces and it opened my eyes. 3 Tours of the Golan my friend, not much i need to know about Israel and all the *** in that part of the World. 2 Tours in Afghanistan before i retired.

The 1 thing i learned from those experiences? never, ever, believe 1 single word that comes out of a Government/Politicians mouth. ever.

i dont care what Country your from. They all lie, they all cover each others *****...end of story.

Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:57 PM EDT
Posted by t_barr

Amen t_barr, a f''in men..

Gulf of Tonkin, Northwoods, the list goes on and on. But yet, people like guyfrompa dont want to hear that their Government is cruel, wicked and secretive. dont tell them that please, it''ll burst their bubble about Conspiracy''s. They must not exist if the Government said so..

northwoods not only sounds familiar, it is the basis of what we saw on Sept 11th, 2001.

Google Operation Northwoods guyfrompa and all you other disbelieving sheep....see what they were prepared to do back then. A certain President and his brother were shot by these Elites for opposing them.

Its not rocket science, its released documents from the US Government records...it was planned out and pushed through until the Kennedy''s fought back and squashed it. We know what happend to them dont we.

figure it out.
Reply to this comment
by June 26, 2008 5:56 PM EDT
slapp1, I think it serves a good purpose to serve in military. I''m considering the option too, as soon as I''ve received my degree in medicine. We''ll just have to wait and see how cracked up the world will be by then.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 26, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
Posted by bluestardad at 02:39 PM : Jun 26, 2008

wrongggggggggggggg

it is the DEMONIC-RAT DOCTRINE,,, lol

On February 16, 1943, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said the "the defense of Saudi Arabia is vital to the defense of the United States." On February 14, 1945, while returning from the Yalta Conference, Roosevelt met with King Ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia on the Great Bitter Lake in the Suez Canal, the first time a U.S. president had visited the Persian Gulf region.

The Carter Doctrine was a policy proclaimed by President of the United States Jimmy Carter in his State of the Union Address on 23 January 1980, which stated that the United States would use military force if necessary to defend its national interests in the Persian Gulf region. The doctrine was a response to the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union, and was intended to deter the Soviet Union%u2014the Cold War adversary of the United States%u2014from seeking hegemony in the Persian Gulf. After stating that Soviet troops in Afghanistan posed "a grave threat to the free movement of Middle East oil," Carter proclaimed:

Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force. (full speech)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Doctrine
Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
i can keep going for hours. answer those 5 just for starters. or are you afraid of the answers?

see people, those who discredit and insult now do not have their speech orifices moving all of a sudden do they, their silence says it all. They dont have an answer for my questions and even if they did, it could be disproved by PROFESSIONALS, Scientists, Engineers, Welders, Demolitions experts...and has been disproved, this is why several prominent Congressman are demanding a new investigation, an independant one, not from people named by the Bush gang, their old Golfing and Country club buddies have been found out. That report is arsewipe and thats all its good for. sorry, the truth stings a little now dont it ye naysayers..LOL!

The list is long. do your homework, dont be a sheep.
Reply to this comment
by June 26, 2008 5:50 PM EDT
"HOW MANY MEMBERS OF AIPAC ARE IN THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT"

Aipac doesn''t need to send members to the congress. Things can be done in an easier fashion. They are a lobbying group and American policymaking is generally based on lobbying. They are able to contribute large amounts of cash to individuals of their liking and support their campaigns.

http://cofcc.org/?p=776
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 26, 2008 5:48 PM EDT
NO RECESSION NO RECESSION NO RECESSION NO RECESSION

Fragile economy improves but not out of woods yet

Fragile economy improves and tax rebates should spur consumers -- but not out of woods yet

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The fragile economy improved slightly at the beginning of the year and could grow a bit stronger in the current quarter as extra cash from tax rebates spurs people to buy more. Still, it''''s not out of danger yet.

The economy grew at a 1 percent annualized rate in the first quarter, helped in large part by stronger sales of U.S. products overseas, the Commerce Department reported Thursday.

That was a tad stronger than the government''''s previous estimate of 0.9 percent growth for the quarter. And, the new reading was better than the anemic 0.6 percent growth rate logged in the final three months of last year.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080626/economy.html?.v=14
Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:44 PM EDT
Posted by steinmeir02

i have to be honest here, ive no idea what i Liberal is, i am not kidding, So in that respect ive 0 clue what qualifys a Liberal or a Democrat and the American idea of what those stand for. not an iota of a clue. peroid.

Im a former Member of my Country''s Military, with a bunchof kids, a business and a house. I vote with whomever seems the most believable at the time, and if it must be known, i have voted, New Democrat, Conservative and Liberal over the 44 years of my life.

What that makes me im not too sure, but 1 thing i am not is a sheep and 1 thing i am not is stupid and gullible. I had 35 men under my Command for over 15 Yeas, i think that qualifies me as at the very least, competant and intelligent, hence my bosses would not have bestowed that kind of trust to nme would they.

Sheeple, sheeple, sheeple, when will you wake up?
Reply to this comment
by blackspeak-2009 June 26, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
bluestardad:

AIPAC doesn''t need to be a "member". It only needs to BUY those who are already "members"...
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad June 26, 2008 5:39 PM EDT
HOW MANY MEMBERS OF AIPAC ARE IN THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?

HOW MANY MEMBERS OF AIPAC ARE IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA?


ITS TIME AMERICA STANDS UP FOR WHAT IS IN HER BEST INTEREST!

THERE IS NOTHING IN THE MIDDLE EAST AMERICA NEEDS AND THEY ARE NO THREAT TO AMERICA!
Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:38 PM EDT
your right, they are losing , as people are now waking up, and finding out that the Official story and the 9/11 Commission was a coverup of massive proportions.

Its not rocket science and i prefer to leave that stuf to the experts, such as Dr Jones who seems a very well spoken and honest man, he is not Political, he is a Top Notch, respected Scientist. People who discredit him only show their true colors and how stupid and shallow they are with their statements and thinking.

We call em sheeple. Remember?..:)
Reply to this comment
by blackspeak-2009 June 26, 2008 5:37 PM EDT
That little gnat of a country (Israel) is hellbend on starting WWIII.
Reply to this comment
by June 26, 2008 5:34 PM EDT
I''ve always pondered where does this antipathy towards people with liberal values come from. I think this mentality is very distinctively present here in the U.S. Canadian conservatives seem to have more endurance, and maybe even common ground. I bet most of those despising "liberals" don''t even know what the word stands for.
Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:32 PM EDT
Posted by noloyalisti

see, i pose the tough questions they cant answer, all of a sudden, they all shut up.

Same old same old...When confronted with the real issues and questions, the story falls apart, when asking the real questions, silence..

nothing new here, same old. The Official story holds 0 water and falls apart even under the lightest scrutiny by professionals in the Scientific Community. They by the thousands have challenged the official story, one of the best and brightest challenge ALL to prove him wrong. They havent as of yet and cant. Why? because they speak the truth, Science does not lie, Politics does. We all know that.

sorry, take your Bs and talk it to people who are sheep.

I found a few more intelligent people here. We are growing in numbers. Sitting idly by swallowing the Official story is for sheeple who follow that quote" Ignorance is Bliss"

Rest of us smart people do our own work.

The Gatekeepers will discredit us and try to marginalize us.

The Truth is the way forward.
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 26, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
"He''s not even american. - Posted by LUVUSA

Sounds like they are on the ropes guy. Anytime someone has to attack with idiotic statements like this, with sound reason behind it - they are losing.
Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
Posted by LUVUSA

haha, touche LUV, this guy is asleep and only wants to close his eyes, not open them. He''s not new, just funny. Many more like him. nothing new here.
Reply to this comment
by slapp1 June 26, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
ok ill bite. im always up for debate.

1. Never said they were no planes. Neither does Dr Jones and all the others who are professionals. what are you?

2. never said there explosives on the planes. Neither does Dr Jones and all the others who are professionals. what are you?

3. no passengers is another thoery, backed up with 0, so ya, that part is hard to explain.

please go on so i can rip them up and guide you in a direction you may find some truth.

my turn.

1. Any steel frame buildings ever fall from fire? ever?

2. Building 7, see anything in the 9/11 report? why i wonder? 47 story steel framed building falls, no plane hit it, 10 seconds it hit the ground? explanation please?

3. NORAD standing down. at Cheneys orders? oneof your own Congressmen testified under oath that this was the case? explain?

4. The insider trading worrth billions that went on during the attack? explain?

5. Pools of molten hot metal for months and months, at the base of 1,2 and 7. Explain? how is high grade steel melted and at what temperature? can jet fuel, carpets, desks, paper get up to that temperature? explain?

i can keep going for hours. answer those 5 just for starters. or are you afraid of the answers?

Reply to this comment
by luvusa June 26, 2008 5:06 PM EDT
slapp1 -Only a liberal *** like yourself would believe all this BS that is thrown at you.
Posted by guyfrompa46

He''s not even american.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti June 26, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
There is no doubt the WTC was a demolition job, the evidence is overwhelming. What the commission did not find out is who planned and carried it out.

Does anyone still actually believe the completely lame government conspiracy theory? That is a real stretch of undocumented and ignorant evidence!!!!
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 26, 2008 5:03 PM EDT
Posted by steinmeir02 at 01:58 PM : Jun 26, 2008

if left wingnut bill maher and bubba wet willy kkklowntoon are not buying your BS conspiracy theories,,,

why should anybody else,,,
Reply to this comment
See all 1833 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (203 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: