Comments on: Al Qaeda's New Face Of Terror: American?
Top Counter-Terrorism Official At FBI Tells CBS News Next Attack On U.S. Could Be Carried Out By Americans
Add a Comment See all 344 Comments
- He said he didnt call you names, and then turned right around and called you a "Fascist"....HAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by poopusbuttus
-You forgot about Nazi and "Sieg Hiel" as well.
LOL!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singinrick
Yes, but that''s after all the "RFLMAO''s" as well.... - Reply to this comment
- Winston Churchill tried to warn the forces of appeasement.He said an appeaser is someone who feeds a crocodile in the futile hope it will eat him last..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by underdogus
Funny how you can sum up the dummy libs in just one quick pithy comment :) - Reply to this comment
- Bu$hFear...
You will NEVER meet a terrorist in your lifetime.
The odds are that remote.
Unless you come face-to-face with Dubya. - Reply to this comment
- Do you agree Saddam Hussein should''''ve been taken out IOWEIGN?
Posted by singinrick at 11:30 AM : Feb 12, 2008
No - he was contained.
Posted by IOWEIGN
-LOL...whatever my friend. Tell that to the thousands of Iraqi citizens he had murdered who disagreed with him.
Posted by singinrick at 11:34 AM : Feb 12, 2008
He killed some of those citizens by weapons supplied by the USA.
Iraq invasion was not a UN mission and we violated the UN Charter by invading. - Reply to this comment
- Winston Churchill tried to warn the forces of appeasement.He said an appeaser is someone who feeds a crocodile in the futile hope it will eat him last..
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by underdogus
-A perfect description of liberals.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singinrick
And, Churchill was absolutely correct. - Reply to this comment
- Do you agree Saddam Hussein should''''ve been taken out IOWEIGN?
Posted by singinrick at 11:30 AM : Feb 12, 2008
No - he was contained.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by IOWEIGN
IOWEIGNDUMMY -- If President (Elected Twice) Bush stood up in let''s say, the state of the Union Address and started plucking people that disagreed with his policy''s out of the crowd to either have them murdered, or tortured...would you agree with that? - Reply to this comment
- poopus, check this out, this has got to be the funniest post I''''ve read on here in a long time, from another board where MCVet is posting:
I do NOT call people names, simply state the truth
posted by MCVet
Link:
http://www.cbsnews.com
/stories/2008/02/12/world/main3820198.sh
tml#ccmm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singinrick
He said he didnt call you names, and then turned right around and called you a "Fascist"....HAHAHAHAHAHA - Reply to this comment
- Do you agree Saddam Hussein should''ve been taken out IOWEIGN?
Posted by singinrick at 11:30 AM : Feb 12, 2008
No - he was contained. - Reply to this comment
- Winston Churchill tried to warn the forces of appeasement.He said an appeaser is someone who feeds a crocodile in the futile hope it will eat him last..
- Reply to this comment
- know that if someone is charged as a terrorist, they lose their rights to habeas corpus, our great dictoator has seen to that. To me sitting in prison for years without being charged with a crime, is a lost of rights.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by alexma50085
Too bad. We are not talking about a Nazi, or a North Korean, or a North Vietnamese, etc...that is in uniform.
We are talking about Jihadists.
There is a reason why they are not guaranteed trials in the civilian courts. That is because they have a right to face their accuser.
Who''s gonna fly all of the relatives over here that the suicide bombers and the KSM''s out there that killed more muslims than Americans?
So you see, that''s not going to happen. Now, in my opinion, the military tribunals will work just fine. - Reply to this comment
- RICK, I wouldnt even engage the WMD craap. We all thought he had them, the Russians said they did, the Brits said they did, the Saud''''s said they did and the Turks said they did.
But yet, they keep pointing it all back to Bush.
It''''s an irrelevent argument at this point. They know they look dumb when they bring it up.
Posted by poopusbuttus at 11:25 AM : Feb 12, 2008
But the UN Weapons Inspectors didn''t....DUH
Where were/are the Brits, Russians, Turks and Saudis now?? - Reply to this comment
- Poopus, notice the childish "singinGrick" is even twisting his very own postings now trying to portray himself as me.
How immature.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singinrick
Rick, to tell you the truth, I dont even read his/her posts..... - Reply to this comment
- Because most libs are secularists/atheists and don''''t have a moral foundation in their life
Posted by Singinrick
Tell me IOWEIGN, how long do you plan on whining about the WMD''s and how long are you going to deny that even most liberal politicians agreed SADDAM HUSSEIN was a threat that needed to be taken out?
Posted by singinrick at 11:20 AM : Feb 12, 2008
It was about morals Rick and Bush/Cheney lied and invaded. You can''t transfer that behavior to someone that just because they made some comment, it wasn''t their actions. It was Bush and Cheney''s behavior and actions... - Reply to this comment
- Tell me IOWEIGN, how long do you plan on whining about the WMD''''s and how long are you going to deny that even most liberal politicians agreed SADDAM HUSSEIN was a threat that needed to be taken out?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singinrick
RICK, I wouldnt even engage the WMD craap. We all thought he had them, the Russians said they did, the Brits said they did, the Saud''s said they did and the Turks said they did.
But yet, they keep pointing it all back to Bush.
It''s an irrelevent argument at this point. They know they look dumb when they bring it up. - Reply to this comment
- poopusbuttus,
I know that if someone is charged as a terrorist, they lose their rights to habeas corpus, our great dictoator has seen to that. To me sitting in prison for years without being charged with a crime, is a lost of rights. - Reply to this comment
singinrick
It''s true that some Democrats believed Bush''s lies as did most Americans. It doesn''t excuse Bush lying us into an immorall and disasterous war that has killed hundreds of thousands.
Who was Sadam a threat to exactly?- Reply to this comment
- Is it moral to LIE about WMDs to invade a country ? NOooo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by IOWEIGN
Hmmmm. It''s a moral lie to lie to Congress about getting your diick sucked too. But yet, Clintonorius got taken down and impeached. But yet, Bush is not going to get impeached.
Why is that, I wonder? Could it be that the majority of Americans can cut through all of Dummy IOWEIGN''s viewpoints?
HYAHAHAHAHAHA. Dummy..... - Reply to this comment
- Come on liberals, let''''s here you say it:
" Allah Akbar! "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singinrick
HAHAHAHAHAHAH - Reply to this comment
- Because most libs are secularists/atheists and don''''t have a moral foundation in their life
Posted by Singinrick
Bush/Cheney and their 935 lies - Reply to this comment
- Anybody that believes taking away American Freedoms will make our nation more secure is fooling themselves. How much more will it take? Does our government have to tell you where you can work or where you can live or who you can worship before you see what our government has done to our basic freedoms? It''''s already started with Bush, he has danced his victory against terror all over our constitution, but I guess you don''''t care about a 200 year old piece of paper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by alexma50085
Your "Dummy" party says that "Spreading Fear (as in the terrorism that is facing us), is a all a crock".
So, what are you doing now? Spreading fear maybe?
So tell us, what specific freedoms have you lost? - Reply to this comment
International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more.
