Comments on: Bhutto Death Threatens Democracy, Security
More Violence, Derailed Elections And Vulnerable Nukes May Loom After Pakistan Opposition Leader's Assassination
- Ahh, the big picture has been placed on the wall. Now Iran is effectively surrounded. The Zionist plan is in full motion. There can''t be democracy in Pakistan, the region must remain unstable for the jews to stick their dagger in and twist.
- Reply to this comment
- I GUESS THE KILLING OF BHUTTO MADE MORE STRONGER THE ROAD FOR BUSH IN PAKISTAN TO DOMINATE THE COUNTRY AND OF COURSE THE WEAPONS .. BUT EVEN THEN I''''M NOT SURE THE OTHER FACTIONS WILL BE RETRACT THEMSELFS .. THAT''''S WHY PAKISTAN IS ON FIRE RIGHT NOW..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by V_161877 at 11:04 AM : Dec 28, 2007
I disagree. Her death will cause alot of problems for Bush. 54% of Pakistan is contolled by the Taliban. With the attitude of the American people, Congress would not OK going into Pakistan. If Bush orders it anyway, he may very well cause the Rebublicans to be voted out of office simply for being in the same party with him. - Reply to this comment
- V_161877, I have repeatedly asked for clarification. It seems to me that you either are just spewing information you hear on Rush Limbaugh or you are trying to foment an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. This assasination would not benefit Bush or Musharraf as it maked Bhutto a martyr.
- Reply to this comment
- WHO CARES WHAT THE HELL... THE POINT IS THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE IN THE BLACK MARKET FOR SALE..ANYWAY...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by V_161877 at 10:52 AM : Dec 28, 2007
First let me apologize for others condemning you for not speaking English as a first language. Would you be more comfortable in Spanish, French or German?
Second, what does Nuclear wepons being for sale on the black market have to do with your conspiracy theory? Do you mean that Bush had her killed to stop this or to put more weapons out there? How would her dying change this? - Reply to this comment
- Only at leftwing central would this enemies words even be considered!
Posted by notblue at 10:39 AM : Dec 28, 2007
One more time will I say that I am not a liberal or a conservative. If V_161877 is a terrorist I will converse with him to learn his mindset. If not, I am very interested in why he feels this way. Name calling only show a lack of intelligence. - Reply to this comment
- lets get us another christian president, that will solve all them problems bubba
- Reply to this comment
- V_161877 is a terrorist himself, hello people! He doesn''t even speak the language, he is a defender of Osama. Do you people hate Bush sooo much that you would discuss with and listen to likes of this radical? Only at leftwing central would this enemies words even be considered!
- Reply to this comment
- BUT THE PLAN WAS TO BLAME AL QAEDA AND THE TALIBAN..AND PUT SOME OF THEM IN CONFLICT. IS VERY COMPLEX..
Posted by V_161877 at 10:32 AM : Dec 28, 2007
I guess I am not understanding you. Your answer does not make sense. If Bush is blaming Al Qaeda and wants conflict between them and the Taliban - how does this benifit Bush? - Reply to this comment
- sharnceder Exactly how I size up Bush and
the administration. - Reply to this comment
- V_161877 Let me get this straight. Bhutto was for getting the terrorists out of Pakistan. So, Bush had her assasinated so he could blame Al Qaeda? I know Bush is a little slow, but even he would know this will lead to riots and more sectarion violence. Bush may want to invade Pakistan, but even he knows that we will lose. So, Again, please explain why you think the "Government" is involved - and how.
- Reply to this comment
Pesident Obama's



