Comments on: 10 Tough Questions For 10 Top Candidates
Katie Couric Asks Presidential Candidates Questions Of Character -- And Gets Surprising Answers
- I think Ron Paul has been excluded because too many gravy trains might end if he was elected... But the good news is that we don''t need Katie Couric, her network, and their silly questions to get Ron Paul more support.
- Reply to this comment
- Shame on Katie Couric for excluding Ron Paul.
- Reply to this comment
- Shame on you Katie Couric for excluding Ron Paul.
- Reply to this comment
- THEmagic07,
I am still confused at what your complaint is? - Reply to this comment
- I guess you mean 10 Stupid Questions unrelated to the core issues that affect the lives of Americans. And why would she choose to only ask some of the candidates? We haven''t even had the first primary yet--this is still the time to be finding out the views of EVERY person running for president--not just the select few that CBS wants us to choose from.
- Reply to this comment
- I see Mitt Romney getting the nomination. He''''''''s the best speaker, best debater, and most intelligent of the bunch.
Posted by robertkjjj
----
Then how the F*** did Bush get to be President with the D Average he had - Oh yeah - Daddy got him a "C" Average and then cheated to win an election for W.
Please don''t put forward the Republican double standards for President. - Reply to this comment
- I see Mitt Romney getting the nomination. He''''s the best speaker, best debater, and most intelligent of the bunch.
Posted by robertkjjj
Since when is that the criteria for being president? last time it was who would you like to have a beer with, and it doesn''t seem like those who would vote Republican have gotten much smarter over the last 8 years. - Reply to this comment
- Let there be no mistake: this is a weak group of Democrats, and they are fighting among themselves so much that they will become even weaker. I have correctly predicted the nominees and the winners of the last 10 Presidential elections, and although predicting for 2008 is tough, I''m going to now predict the race for next year. For Republicans, I see Mitt Romney getting the nomination. He''s the best speaker, best debater, and most intelligent of the bunch. Rudy will burn out. Rudy has too many skeletons and a temper. Huckabee has too little name recognition and his last name is killing him; sounds too much like a hillbilly. Thompson is lazy and too slow. Ron Paul: you got to be kidding. For the Democrats, it''s more a process of elimination: Obama? Sorry, but there is simply no way mostly-conservative America will nominate a black man named Barack Obama; not seeing this happen at all. Edwards? Too wimpy and whiny; he looks and talks weak. All the others are not well known and have incredibly small numbers. Clinton looks like the one who will stay on top. For the 11/08 general election, it will be Romney vs. Clinton. Look for a brutal summer and fall next year of Hillary vs. Mitt. Because Hillary is a polarizing figure, and there are over 20 million Americans who have said they will not vote for her no matter what, I see Romney winning a very close one in the general election, with about 5-to-10 more electoral votes than Hillary. The next President will be Mitt Romney.
- Reply to this comment
- omega39,
Dukakis redux would have Huckabee with his Willie Horton and Huckabee riding around in a tank. I think Huckabee would look sillier in a tank than Hillary would anyway. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by Smirk5
Great, so if Huckabee makes it we can have Dukakis redux. Hillary can ride around in her tank while Huckabee lets Willie Horton out the revolving door. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




