Comments on: Did Rudy Bury Cost Of Trips To Mistress?

Report: Giuliani Billed Security Expenses To Obscure NYC Agencies

Add a Comment See all 123 Comments
by simonsez40 November 29, 2007 11:22 AM EST
Guilliani - corrupt politician! No amount of white-washing can make this salesman clean. It amazes me the same things the Repugs sacrificed Clinton for seems to turn a blind eye for Guilliani.........just like they''ve done the Bush administration!

Wake up people............we all know a con-artist when we see one.
Reply to this comment
by pelosisaho1 November 29, 2007 11:06 AM EST
Mcvet,

stop lying. You NEVER served.

Or if you did it was the VC. If you wish to prove otherwise, then you should hate a draft dodger like Clinton - a coward who later on refused to bomb Bin Laden but got us involved in an ILLEGAL war in Kosovo. Again, prove otherwise, and then start licking Bill and Hil''s spittle off your uniform, bozo.

This is just another one of chipmunk cheeks Couric''s services to her party - the Dems, all on CBS'' tab.

Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 November 29, 2007 11:05 AM EST
I hear taps playing. It is funny they used to be a party that cared now all they care about is winning.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet November 29, 2007 10:55 AM EST
The Toe Tappers Association is really something. They spend MILLIONS of our tax dollars investigation a REAL President and turn around and support something like Rudy! Talk about hypocrits??? Sieg Heil and Amen
Reply to this comment
by skyhawk761 November 29, 2007 10:04 AM EST
Look, he was mayor of NYC, he needed protection, get over it. Where he was gettin'''' it, is his own business. What''''s wrong with this country?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Candide777 at 10:05 PM : Nov 28, 2007

This sure wasn''t the same response the Repubs gave when they discovered President Clinton was getting a BJ under his desk. Why was it everyones business when Bill was "gettin it"?
Reply to this comment
by fibonacci_ November 29, 2007 8:41 AM EST
Rudy should lose just because of his lithp (lisp).
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 November 29, 2007 6:42 AM EST
and we have a whole nuther year of listening to this kind of tripe.
Reply to this comment
by lawyertom1 November 29, 2007 5:33 AM EST
I told you, Rudy, they are coming for you. When you campaign on the fraudulent and make-believe issues that you do, when you adopt a holier than thou attitude, unless you are pure as the driven snow you will get nailed. And you have. Kiss your campaign goodbye.
Reply to this comment
by figuy30 November 29, 2007 5:22 AM EST
What else is new? What does everyone expect...morals? I can only imagine what this guy would do if he ever got to the White House. Next thing you know we could be in the middle of "common pratice". By the way, whatever happened to all the things Hillary and Bill took from the White House when Bill left office? And did George Bush ever find that $9 billion that got "lost" in Iraq? Oh well, I guess American Taxpayers can always eat cake.
Reply to this comment
by nyckate November 29, 2007 5:16 AM EST
j-whitman

LOL -- OMG - I love that picture they have with the article.

We all kinda knew there was something wrong with Rudy''s list of clients - if they weren''t something he had to hide he''d have already released the list!
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 November 29, 2007 4:59 AM EST
The NYC Loft Board? For those amused by Giuliani''s passionate attachment to city lofts, here is a sample of its mission (from the official website)--
"The New York City Loft Board was established in 1982 to regulate the legal conversion of certain lofts in the city from commercial/manufacturing use to residential use... Article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law, also known as the Loft Law, created a new classification of buildings... (which) encompasses formerly commercial and manufacturing loft spaces that were used as residences by three independent families during the period of April 1, 1980 through December 1, 1981.

"Because these lofts failed to meet the fire safety and other code requirements for legal residential occupancy, the Loft Law also established the Loft Board with the mission of coordinating the legal conversion of these spaces to safe residential use."

I understand why Giuliani thought his questionable security expenses were safer here-- out of sight, out of mind. Unlike Bush, he could not declare them "classified".
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 November 29, 2007 4:49 AM EST
CBS reports political analyst Mike Allen said, "''These were records that the city comptroller tried to get in the past, but the mayor''s office said they couldn''t be released because of security...''"
---
Reminds us of Bush, Cheney and minions hiding their misdeeds by declaring their incriminating evidence "secret", "classified", etc.

Doubtless, that practice has hidden acres of scandal about Bush. The use to which the secrecy label is put betrays its real purpose-- when Bush, or Cheney suddenly decides it is OK to reveal parts of the NIE, after all, to selected reporters.
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 November 29, 2007 4:42 AM EST
Perfect politician: Crooked, adulterer, corrupt leader, just the run of the mill leader in waiting. And we wonder why less then 50% of the population turns out for presidential elections. Both parties keep scraping the bottom of the barrel, I''m sure you can find even more scum.
Reply to this comment
by dlounsbury1 November 29, 2007 4:41 AM EST
Guiliani will bring more scandal to the whitehouse and his past proves it. Mistresses and a police chief who is mob connected. I want a scandal free president. There is only one person who proves to be scandal free:

Mitt Romney

Huckabee had five campaign finance violations, stole property from the governor''s office and used campaign money to pay his babysitter. Thompson''s trophy wife is not first lady material.

Scandals detract from the business of government and prevent your from achieving your political goals. Haven''t both parties learned this yet? Romney has the best chance to focus on a conservative agenda free from scandal.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds November 29, 2007 4:33 AM EST
And this guy is the front runner for the GOP Presidential nomination??
What does this say about the GOP memebers? Or, do the polls have it wrong?

Posted by ramos937 at 01:20 AM : Nov 29, 2007

What it says is that he''s amoral and corrupt. In other words a perfect republican candidate.
Reply to this comment
by jetranger7 November 29, 2007 4:30 AM EST
This is the Web Site that all the Politicians visit for Mistresses !! WWW.DOMINA.MS
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 November 29, 2007 4:20 AM EST
Let''s see. Rudy billed NYC for trips taken to his his mistress while he was still married; he was not around much of the time post 9/11 because he was with her; he is opposed by his family; Kerik, a close personal friend and former protegee, is being indicted; the list goes on and on with more to come.
And this guy is the front runner for the GOP Presidential nomination??
What does this say about the GOP memebers? Or, do the polls have it wrong?
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds November 29, 2007 3:53 AM EST
neocons dont live in a real world

Posted by ainttaken at 12:43 AM : Nov 29, 2007

True enough. Many of them it seems take their political leanings out of Nazism though. That and 1984. It used to be a truism in any debate that the first person to mention the Nazi''s or Hitler automatically lost. Thanks to Bush and esp Cheney, that''s no longer true.

Just as a side note to history about the concept of a Nazi Jew, the truth is that in the early days of Nazism many German Jews supported Hitler because of his virulent nationalism. Contrary to popular belief that Hitler''s biggest mistake was attacking Russia, the truth is that his fatal flaw was anti-Semitism. If he had included the German Jews in his plans rather then try to exterminate then the Nazis would have been nearly unstoppable.
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot November 29, 2007 3:49 AM EST
He went off to the woods to play "hide the salami" during one of his extra-marital affairs, and had the nerve to charge taxpayers for his police escort!!!
With balls this big, this guy must have to have his suits specially made.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds November 29, 2007 3:35 AM EST
careful there sarge
they might send Gannon after you. I never visited his website but I hear he is pretty ripped.

Posted by ainttaken at 12:31 AM : Nov 29, 2007

I saw some of his pictures from his website on some of the news reports. Some of my g*ay friends here in Hollywood agreed that he is ripped, but he has a fatal flaw that makes him grotesquely ugly to them, he''s a republican. One of them told me that being a g*ay republican is sort of like being a black KKK member or a Jewish Nazi. While it''s technically possible, it just doesn''t make sense in the real world.........
Reply to this comment
See all 123 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tiger: "I'm Human and I'm Not Perfect"

    (184 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: