Comments on: Did Rudy Bury Cost Of Trips To Mistress?

Report: Giuliani Billed Security Expenses To Obscure NYC Agencies

Add a Comment See all 123 Comments
by starleo146 November 29, 2007 8:03 PM EST
Just look at this---Rudy Giuliani tied to ''superhighways''
Law firm represents consortia funding NAFTA-related routes
uestions are being raised over Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani''s policy on terrorism, after a report revealed he has strong ties to two foreign investment consortia working to own or lease U.S. toll roads, including the Trans-Texas Corridor 35, which is identified as part of the I-35 "NAFTA Superhighway."

Although he opposed NAFTA in 1993, Giuliani recently declined to call for building a fence on the United States border with Mexico, and he has supported a guest-worker program.

Reply to this comment
by starleo146 November 29, 2007 7:51 PM EST
Clinton became the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON ever to serve as president of the U.S.A.
Posted by mike71067"

Except that this is false, mike. Neither was he a felon nor was he pardoned. Sure, he gamed the system to avoid service, but this other stuff is simply false. See Snopes.com for more.

Posted by shingles1 at 11:29 AM : Nov 29, 2007

What the he11 has Clinton got to do with this, every time one of your guys get in trouble, which has been a lot lately, hard to keep up, and what do you say about it, instead of denouncing it if it is correct, you bring out Clinton, like well, Clinton did it so he can do it.When will we say if you did it you deserve to be punished.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 November 29, 2007 7:42 PM EST
Posted by bburgis at 04:10 PM : Nov 29, 2007
+ report a

Exactly Giuliani is a double talker and he needs to get this out there and get the very questions you just askrd answered before they come up with more double talk to protect the first double talk. He is Loser and made Millions off a tradergy
Reply to this comment
by bburgis-2009 November 29, 2007 7:10 PM EST
Who cooked the books?

Rudy didn''t personally code these expenses to these obscure city agencies, someone directed an accountant from the NYC OMB to do this. That is the person we need to hear from.
Was it former Deputy Mayor Joe Lhota? Can he explain this?
Robert M. Harding and Adam L. Barsky both served as Director of the NYC Office Of Management and Budget under Giuliani. Can either of them come forward and explain this creative accounting, where all of these the funds were coded and who instructed OMB to code these expenditures in this manner?
Reply to this comment
by crater7 November 29, 2007 7:08 PM EST
GOSH SAKES, MUST BE A LOT OF THEM THAR TERRORIST OUT THAR IN THEM HAMPTONS.

I CAN SEE WHERE THE REPUBS LIKE THIS GUY. MORE OF THE SAME OLE LIES AND DECEPTIONS.

STAYYYYYYYYYYYYY THE COURSE...............
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 November 29, 2007 5:43 PM EST
You may have to explain that one a bit more. The few crotch scratching idiots who still support Bush have no idea what an education is and are right now busily trying to look up the word prestigious in the dictionary to see if they''''ve just been insulted or not. Not easy since they only keep a dictionary around so they can giggle at the "dirty" words before they molest their little sister.

Posted by SgtRDS at 10:29 AM : Nov 29, 2007

:)
Reply to this comment
by sanfelz November 29, 2007 5:13 PM EST
If Rudy was still a prosecutor and this was some other candidate, he would be screaming for an investigation and Rudy would be yelling in self-righteous outrage.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 November 29, 2007 4:48 PM EST



So why the question mark, the amount for the year was a 600K figure and this line is the story. The only thing left to debate would be if it the soon to be third wife was the only reason but that doesn%u2019t really matter does it the expense were not in plain site. I am sure we shall soon hear that it was the indicted felon and Rudy crony Bernie Kreiks fault....Imagine what else is out there yet to come out %u2026.this man is a fatally flawed candidate and only the red righties bias against anyone not Republican would imagine the country would elect this man, who charged the tax payers of NY almost a million dollars for his BOOTY CALLS to the future wife%u2026.
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 November 29, 2007 4:17 PM EST


If this was a Democrat, the Republicans would be screaching.

If there was nothing wrong with what he did then why did he try to hide the expenses from auditors?


Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 November 29, 2007 4:00 PM EST
Though disgusted at his having a mistress, Giuliani''''s response does make sense though.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by denn034 at 12:53 PM : Nov 29, 2007


I could care less that Rudy can not keep it zipped, but he stole tax payer money to fund his travel for his tryst, Politico showed 600K in a year. NY may not of course care but I do not want a President using my tax dollars for his BLOWERS. At least Clinton had the decency to overlap by working at his office. Oh I forgot so did Rudy he was also courting one of the Deputies in his office as well%u2026..if I were a tax payer of NY during that time I would file a suit like Paula Jones and dispose the whole lot of the crooks.
Reply to this comment
See all 123 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: