Comments on: Hillary Clinton: The Teflon Candidate?

Democratic Presidential Hopeful Continues To Slip Rivals' Punches

Add a Comment See all 90 Comments
by radiob-2009 September 28, 2007 12:46 PM EDT
A four year old child is watching President Bush on TV and ask''s her mother "what language is this" ?


Laura Bush is to undergo surgery once again, her pain in the "neck" is back.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm September 28, 2007 12:46 PM EDT
In the end, sodomy is not relevant at the presidential level.

Posted by Iceman_1960

Thats not true. They are cowards because they refuse to deal with the issues.

most of these candidates, both parties, are hyperbolic about thier interests and representations

campains are run to present information that they think people want to hear while insulating the public from the truth

so effectively, the politicians play us for stupid by telling us what we want to hear, not what they are going to do

its the same thing that you do alot of the time, i put it down to simple words

lying through omission
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 11:27 AM EDT
"Sodomy is no good for the United States. Neither is Hillary."
- Posted by pwrslm at 08:05 AM : Sep 28, 2007

In the end, sodomy is not relevant at the presidential level.

"I''m pro-choice. I%u2019m pro-gay rights." - Rudy Giuliani, on CNN''s ''Inside Politics'', December 2, 1999.


Reply to this comment
by pwrslm September 28, 2007 11:10 AM EDT
Most women would leave thier husbands for all everything billy boy did....

Hillary didnt have the sense to stand up for her own rights, either that or she really isnt a very good example for society because she accepts it.

Billy should have had his pants sued a dozen times over for his sexual misconduct. If Hillary didnt help him hide the truth about his sexual harassment of women over a decade before he became president, Billy boy would never have been elected President. The final analysis is they lied to America, more than once!! (I did not have ssexx with that gurl, but thats only depending on how you define "is")

Hillary had no problems helping Billy deceive America already. It makes you wonder why she went to court to supress information about what she did when she was 1st lady. There is no doubt about it. Hillary thinks we are stupid and forgetful.

Will we fall for it a second time?

The Office of the President isnt a position at McDonalds. Time for America to wake up and dump this broad!
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm September 28, 2007 11:05 AM EDT
Hillary supports sodomites.

She does. She knows that the majority of homosexuals in the world are men. She hates men. Sodomites have a life expectancy of 41 years. They get sick from terrible diseases and die young, and they dont reproduce. That makes Hillary happy.

The chinese like Hillary too. They dont want americans to reproduce, so they finance sodomy backers like the Clintons. That way, the US Military will be diminished in the long run, and it will be easier to subvert the US Government.

Sodomy is no good for the United States. Neither is Hillary.
Reply to this comment
by signof4 September 28, 2007 10:56 AM EDT
''Hillary Clinton: The Teflon Candidate?''

This is hilarious! If the LAMEstream media went after her the same way they zero in on conservatives, she''d be known as the ''Velcro'' candidate.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 10:01 AM EDT
RE: "In 2006, running for reelection, [Hillary] faced John Spencer, perhaps the most exciting Republican to be nominated for any office since Abraham Lincoln. She beat him with 67 percent of the vote to his 31 percent, carrying all but 4 of New York''s 62 counties."

Where have we heard this before ?

Spencer, a Vietnam Vet, called Hillary a "traitor" who "aids and abets our enemies" in the War on Terrorism.

Spencer garnered only 31% of the vote, and did not win a single ward in his hometown of Yonkers, NY, where he had been Mayor.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 9:52 AM EDT
"She... simply has not been hit yet by a Republican leader that will ''pound'' her !"
- Posted by Jack3213 at 06:41 AM : Sep 28, 2007

But she has.

In 2000 both Rudy Giuliani (who cut and ran following health problems) and Rick Lazio went down to defeat against her in her first Senate race.

In 2006, running for reelection, she faced John Spencer, perhaps the most exciting Republican to be nominated for any office since Abraham Lincoln. She beat him with 67 percent of the vote to his 31 percent, carrying all but 4 of New York''s 62 counties.

Rudy Giulinai, back for more, recently tried to smear her for daring to disagree with General Petraeus. After that, Rudy declined several percentage points, and now trails her by 5.




Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 9:42 AM EDT
I certainly have a lot of nerve, after denouncing Prinzowhales for his "Vince Foster" theories, to then be posting an innuendo about Laura Bush''s tragic car accident.

Shame on me.
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 September 28, 2007 9:41 AM EDT
"The war and health care are both potential minefields for her, and she%u2019s slipped both punches, says Democratic consultant Anita Dunn."

Ms. Dunn, I think you live in an illusion. She has not slipped by anything, simply she has not been hit yet by a Republican leader that will ''pound'' her !Just wait..listen and learn. The woman will not lead our country, it is so obvious I laugh that others don''t see that! LOL
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 9:05 AM EDT
"Iceman,

I gotta go; another time some other day.

Live Long and Prosper."
- Posted by AJMarine1 at 06:01 AM : Sep 28, 2007

Thanks.

You too.
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine1 September 28, 2007 9:01 AM EDT
Iceman,

I gotta go; another time some other day.

Live Long and Prosper.
Reply to this comment
by zootallures2 September 28, 2007 8:47 AM EDT
"Hillary Clinton: The Teflon Candidate?"

Let''s test it out. Put her on the stove with some burgers on top and see what happens.
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine1 September 28, 2007 8:31 AM EDT
It''''s early.

Never mind. It was in bad taste anyway.

Posted by Iceman_1960

Yes, it is early, there''s no one here and it sounds like we both are just killing time; everything is good.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 8:27 AM EDT
She wasn''t Laura Bush at the time.

It''s early.

Never mind. It was in bad taste anyway.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 8:26 AM EDT
RE: Post by AJMarine1 at 05:04 AM : Sep 28, 2007

Not to make light of a terrible tragedy, but a careless newspaper editor could have produced a sensational headline:

"Michael Douglas Dead after Encounter with ***** Bush"
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 8:23 AM EDT
RE: "More women will automatically vote for a reasonably qualified female candidate, than will admit that now to pollsters."

That''s just a hunch on my part, but a pretty sound one, based on many years'' acquaintance with human nature.
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine1 September 28, 2007 8:14 AM EDT
Iceman_1960,

No problem, it''s just nice to stimulate the brain with something besides Bush and the war.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 September 28, 2007 8:13 AM EDT
"Laura Bush and her passenger, Judy *****..."

Good one, AJMarine1. I missed that one.

LOL !!

Reply to this comment
by ajmarine1 September 28, 2007 8:11 AM EDT
While saying she took full responsibility for her error, Clinton repeatedly insisted that she had been misled by "false" intelligence on Iraq''''s weapons of mass destruction presented by the Bush administration."



"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq''s weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 |



Reply to this comment
See all 90 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (253 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: