Comments on: Is $100M Guantanamo Courthouse Necessary?

Pentagon's Plans For Another Facility To Try 60 People Are Questioned

Add a Comment See all 44 Comments
by hvac1000 December 19, 2006 4:33 PM EST
Just pitch a tent. That is all they need.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 December 19, 2006 4:33 PM EST
For 60 detainees??? What's wrong with a tent??
Reply to this comment
by talkingham December 19, 2006 4:02 PM EST
Well, that's only $1.4-million per prisoner but of course that doesn't include court costs and the costs of prosecution. Heck, this was only exceeded on a per prisoner basis by what the repubs spent to track down Clinton's sexcapades. These repubs really have their act in gear and their priorities organizized.

Why not build a $200-million courthouse we don't want to be outdone by Iran or the Saudis.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad December 19, 2006 4:01 PM EST
Is haliburton in on this? it sounds too good to be true.
Reply to this comment
by rharrin1 December 19, 2006 2:58 PM EST
The answer is NO, we need to build a reservoir to stop this MONEY WATERFALL.
Reply to this comment
by randalds December 19, 2006 1:56 PM EST
Good point grumpas. You know the people who should be the most angry at this administration are the true republicans. They got had even worse then the democrats who opposed them. This administration has dragged the conservative republican name through the filth by running up huge deficits. Real republican values are supposed to be about small government, low taxes (for everyone, not just the rich), no foreign entanglements, a balanced budget and staying out of peoples private business. True Barry Goldwater republican conservatives have been screwed by Bush and Cheney the past 6 years and Barry is no doubt spinning in his grave that they dare call themselves "conservatives" of any kind.
Reply to this comment
by randalds December 19, 2006 1:36 PM EST
The only possible use I could see for this would be as a secure place to hold the war crimes trials of George W. Bush and his Nazi-want-to-be cronies.
Reply to this comment
by grumpas December 19, 2006 1:28 PM EST
No doubt Bush has Halliburton in mind to build it! It will probably wind up being another rape of the American taxpayer by the time Bush's cronies get through f......it completely up! I hope I never hear another Republican say they are fiscally conservative! I am sick to death of the squander! These people should be in jail!
Reply to this comment
by meboard December 19, 2006 1:01 PM EST
Yet another perfect example of how this terrorism business has snowballed into a self serving means to keep and use unchecked power.
Reply to this comment
by nadeau4201 December 19, 2006 12:53 PM EST
EVERYONE PLEASE LOOK UP
www.newswithview.com/Craig/roberts10.htm
It is were America is headed.
Reply to this comment
by blondmadison December 19, 2006 12:20 PM EST
"I am confused why would a concentration camp need a courthouse??"
Posted by jerryomara at 03:54 AM : Dec 19, 2006

You are sooooooooooo right! Good blogs today!
Reply to this comment
by blondmadison December 19, 2006 12:15 PM EST
"The fact that someone tried to rush this through in the dead of night shows that our %u201Cconservatives%u201D are not conservative at all when it comes to spending our money. This $100 million is a nice fat backdoor payback for someone. We need to find out who the benefactor is and who the beneficiary is and run them all out of town."
Posted by ObservantX at 09:08 AM : Dec 19, 2006

Brilliant deduction Watson and well said.
Reply to this comment
by blondmadison December 19, 2006 12:11 PM EST
There are plenty of places to hold trials. $100 million? Soooo Not necessary and it doesn't take a brain surgeon to know this!

I am sick of these people taking the taxpayers money, lying and duping the tax payer---sick of it. This is beyond not having a conscience--to blatant, in the face B.S.

Will it really cost 100 Million or is some of that going in their pockets? It's hard to know due to constant continous lies.
Reply to this comment
by observantx December 19, 2006 12:08 PM EST
The courthouse would sleep up to 1,200 people, there would be a dining facility for 800, and a garage big enough for 100 vehicles.

What IS this? A courthouse or a spa?

They have a courthouse now. It should be sufficient to handle 60 prisoners. End of story. The court house needs to be big enough top handle the judges, the lawyers, the prisoner, a couple of file clerks, translators, a maintenance man, security and a couple of gofers. We are talking about 20 people or less.

The fact that someone tried to rush this through in the dead of night shows that our %u201Cconservatives%u201D are not conservative at all when it comes to spending our money. This $100 million is a nice fat backdoor payback for someone. We need to find out who the benefactor is and who the beneficiary is and run them all out of town.

Reply to this comment
by houser123 December 19, 2006 11:30 AM EST
Can anyone spell special interest payback? How can someone in our government who has any conscious try to push through such an ill conceived and wasteful "Emergency Appropriation" bill in the middle of the night when no one is supposedly watching. I don't care if these guys are supposed to be the worst of the worst, that's even more reason to not give them the type of accomodations that someone is saying is needed. Geez, these people never cease to astonish me, the next thing they will ask for is to build a
$1,000,000,000 apparatus to execute these guys. Has this administration totally sold out to special interest?

Reply to this comment
by tnichlsn December 19, 2006 10:25 AM EST
They might want to use that money building a new 'high-end' prison in the Hague, because that's where the real criminals of this war (Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld) will be tried and sentenced.
Reply to this comment
by msdawhip December 19, 2006 10:19 AM EST
Why not come to Oklahoma City instead? We have an empty GM plant right next to a large Air Force base and we have already experienced terrorism first-hand from a U.S. citizen. The building also survived minimal damage from a killer tornado. Surely the Feds could learn something from a few episodes of a house-flip show and put walls up at the plant for less than a million bucks...
Reply to this comment
by December 19, 2006 10:02 AM EST
We recently read the military needed equipment in Iraq, but there was not enough money to buy what they needed. Now, we have money to build a courthouse? We have a perfectly good courthouse here in Kansas, they can try 2 criminals at a time, and it won't cost money that the middle class American can't afford to lose. How about it?
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 December 19, 2006 9:30 AM EST
ncolsens,
Please ask him to try to keep Haliburton's hands off the deal!
I just do not believe that this 'courthouse' will ever be used as such. Most likely, these detainees will never see a court of any sort. They will simply be held indefinitely, or possibly they will be sent to another country who will look into the matter and find there was no reason to hold them to start with.
Reply to this comment
by December 19, 2006 9:19 AM EST
I have a friend that works in the Pentagon, his job is purchasing, procurement, and contracting, I'll have to call him on this one to see who is trying to line their pockets with these contracts
Reply to this comment
See all 44 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (204 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: