Add a Comment
by hANNA83 April 4, 2011 6:38 AM EDT
I don''t agree with a lot of things that they do also, but to say that this gentleman is nothing but a Bush spokesman is carrying it a little too far. It didn''t take a rocket scientist is know that Saddem Hussein wouldn''t crawl into bed with Bin Ladden, but I guess there are a few in Washington that aren''t rocket scientists, and we know who they are.
<a href="http://www.bestessayhelp.com/essay-help/buy-essay">Buy Essays</a>
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam6 January 31, 2008 7:27 AM EST
Posted by RexProphet at 12:29 AM : Jan 31, 2008

hahaha

you believe soros paid liars LOL

hahaha

AP Reports ''Bush Lied'' Study Funded by Ultra-leftist George Soros
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/01/23/ap-bush-lied-study-not-revealed-funded-george-soros

bush did tell the truth, choke on it bush haters hahaha

Top Secret: Bush Told the Truth About WMD
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=26457045-1E9E-4795-9D31-0E5B73E74EE9

Foreign Intel Had Identified WMD Sites
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/007528.php

Saddam, Nikita and Virtual Weapons of Mass Destruction:
A Question of Threat Perception and Intelligence Assessment
David B. Rivkin, Jr., and Lee A. Casey
http://www.inthenationalinterest.com/Articles/Vol2Issue23/Vol2iss23RivkinCasey.html

THE SECURITY COUNCIL, 27 JANUARY 2003:
AN UPDATE ON INSPECTION
Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC, Dr. Hans Blix
http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/Bx27.htm
Reply to this comment
by sgw01 January 31, 2008 3:10 AM EST
[...and then they took us to an illegal war!]

War was not illegal because it was authorized by Congress, therefore you lied.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 January 31, 2008 1:06 AM EST
Posted by speakinup at 08:13 PM : Jan 30, 2008

Again, Clinton was cautious and did not take us into an illegal war.

BUSH DID! Get it?
Reply to this comment
by speakinup January 30, 2008 11:13 PM EST
Rowdy - what the matter - can''t you handle the truth ?

If Bush had lied to get us into a war, why would he not have placed a WMD in Iraq to vindicate himself ?

And, guess what, Clinton made the same remarks BEFORE bush did. But it didn''t make it into Soros'' articles, did it. Gee, I WONDER why ?

Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 January 30, 2008 10:35 PM EST
Posted by speakinup at 06:36 PM : Jan 30, 2008

As usual the typical republiCON will point their finger at someone else.

President Bush''s regime lied 935 times...and then they took us to an illegal war!

Not the Clintons, not any other politician mislead by their lies, the responsibility for this war lies directly on the Bush administration.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup January 30, 2008 9:36 PM EST
yeah Rex, we know all about the Soros funded ''non-profit'' reports that were supposidly ''news'' last week.

You know the 535 references to the Republicans carefully told ''false statements'' which then the far left translated to mean ''lies'' to get us into Iraq.

Funny thing is, Bill and Hillary Clinton weren''t listed as to how many times they said the same things. In FACT, no Democrat was listed. Does that mean they didn''t say these things - nope - it means they weren''t in the ''news''.

Gee, how did that happen.

A little bias reporting by those Soros Puppets maybe ?
Reply to this comment
by shingles1 January 30, 2008 4:29 PM EST
Scott Pelley has a major problem with the truth.

It''s simple. We demanded, under threat of force, that the inspectors be let back in. Saddam allowed the inspectors back in. And then because we didn''t believe Saddam was being truthful or that the inspectors would find anything, we invaded. In other words, it was entirely the US''s decision to invade.

This doesn''t mean that Saddam was blameless...after all, if he had clearly complied with his obligations after the 1st Gulf War none of this would have happened. However, Scott Pelley is completely distorting and being dishonest what happened back in 2002/2003.

Scott Pelley has a history of being &quot;creative&quot; with the facts...meaning that you guys, CBS, really need a special Public Editor just to keep Scott Pelley in line. Otherwise his light grasp of the facts is going to really kick you in the bus someday.
Reply to this comment
by sandy2497 January 30, 2008 4:09 PM EST
Hubba Hubba. He can interrogate me anytime. Whatever the goverment is paying him, it isn''t enough.
I can see why Saddam Hussein was so taken with him.
I''ve read some of the comments that were made and how this was all propaganda put out by the Bush White House. I want to know one thing, were you in the room during the interrogating? Have you read George Tenete''s book about the CIA? If you think they are lying to cover up something, then why don''t you see if you can''t join up and maybe you can do a much better job than they can. I don''t agree with a lot of things that they do also, but to say that this gentleman is nothing but a Bush spokesman is carrying it a little too far. It didn''t take a rocket scientist is know that Saddem Hussein wouldn''t crawl into bed with Bin Ladden, but I guess there are a few in Washington that aren''t rocket scientists, and we know who they are.
Reply to this comment
by janiceke January 30, 2008 3:41 PM EST
How dare Pelley perpetuate the lies of the Bush Administration! At one time 60 Minutes was a respected TV news magazine -- no longer. It makes me sick to think our country has come to this -- invasion of a country that could not harm the US and had nothing to do with 9/11. My fear is that &quot;journalists&quot; like Pelley will repeat the lies enough and continue to be given a public venue so that they will be able to change the perception of the world at large and the truth will be lost for future generations.
Reply to this comment
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
60 Minutes on Facebook