Comments on: The Age Of Warming
Add a Comment
- Why let facts get in the way. The average temperture at the south pole is MINUS 49. Unless there has been a change in the melting point of ice - nothing will melt until the temperature is around freezing. For you at
CBS 60 minutes it is 32 degrees. The south pole is not melting! - Reply to this comment
- Thank you for re-airing the alert on global warming in the Southern Hemisphere. I have an idea I have been sending to potential investors to slow glacial melting that I would like to send to Scientist Gino Casassa for his input on how to make it more effective, and on how we might proceed. Basically, I propose we use reflective sailcloth to shield the ice and waters. I would appreciate very much information from you on how I could contact him or send him my thoughts.
Thank you for your inspiring program!
Sincerely,
Dot Montaine - Reply to this comment
- As someone who spent a year at the South Pole Scott Pelley%u2019s praise of Gino Casassa was over rated when he said: He was so respected a mountain was named after him. When Antarctica was mapped the mountains were name after anyone who was there. I worked with a cook and communication person who had a mountain named for them
- Reply to this comment
- I tell you what, let''s shut the whole thing down. All industry, power production, etc. No more warming. No more food, no more CBS, no more going to see Grandma in the family car, nothing. You eat what you grow or catch. Cuts down on stray dogs don''t it. No grocery stores.
Sounds a bit like the stone age. If that''s where the liberals want to go, well, Gore might just talk them into it. - Reply to this comment
- I agree with almost all the comments. There was no mention of the fact that the main ice in Antarctica is "thickening" significantly. It seems that even though some warming may be happening, earth is compensating by increasing snows in antarctica so the net effect of sea level rise is near zero. Why don''t you guys show all sides of a question? That''s why I normally watch Fox news.
- Reply to this comment
- Only one answer to this problem: Penguin burgers.
- Reply to this comment
- I watched with great interest your story about the Antarctic warming phenomenon and specifically the conclusion drawn that human activity since the Industrial Revolution is the main contributor to the problem.
A few weeks ago, I had a dream that I wwas receiving a voice-mail and it was from the Chief Economist of the Universe. The subject was global warming and a solution to the problem was offered.Being a musician, I composed a song which I think captures the message. I''m wondering if you are interested in hearing the song? - Reply to this comment
- Something new under the sun?
Interesting climate changes have been occurring since time immemorial.
If climate change is deemed to be such an alarming problem, than why have not the seas risen even an infinitesimal amount in our recent industrial era history?
Certainly we should all be concerned about our environment; but the waters are being murkified and methinks the largest supplier of %u2018warming%u2019 is the hollow hot air emanating from profiteering pundits from each side of the issue.
http://hotairorrealconcern.blogspot.com/ - Reply to this comment
- Thank you for the story, Global Warming/Climate Control.
The stories objectivity was wonderfully shown. That''s right, there''s only one side to global warming, now changed to "climate change".
Why the name change? It''s hard to talk about "Global Warming" when it snows in areas with global warming demonstrations (LOL).
Now that 60 Minutes has told the story from ONLY one side, let''s hear from the other side, those scientists who do not believe in the Global Warming Theory.
When the weather men start predicting the future weather patterns, correctly, then maybe we can look into "your science" into global warming.
Please let me know the airing of the other side.
Drinking the Kool-Aid
Be Good - Reply to this comment
- astro2111 - kudos to you for being able to go out and do your own research!
- Reply to this comment
