Add a Comment
by sfrancais December 3, 2008 12:57 AM EST
Are you putting this episode online like the others. Please do if possible I was unable to watch last weeks shows because of a 5 plus hour power outage ( i missed both feeds. I am from Canada and rarely miss this show ( i tape it when Im out ) I find it be quite interesting. Take care Sean
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon December 2, 2008 3:20 AM EST
Hi toonxz, was/is there any evidence that Doctor Hammond and Broderick were connected in some way? Of course all of these Occult/SATANIC/PEDOPHILE/SRA groups are protected by the police, but unless one has done the research, has some critical thinking ability, and has personal experience, one gets ridiculed,and censured by the innocent/ignorant masses. Keep in mind, by deleting, and editing material, any TV "program" can deliver the message they want to deliver. This case has similarities to the Blue Dahlia case in Hollywood years ago. The perp was most likely a doctor with surgical skills,also. The woman in that case was fraternizing with some very powerful people, and was probably going to "blab" some incriminating evidence. She was disfigured accordingly. I have also been railroaded by our corrupt court system....more than once, so it is not a stretch of the imagination for me,what the courts/police are capable of!
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon December 2, 2008 2:51 AM EST
WHERE ARE MY EARLIER COMMENTS???? CENSORED????
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon December 2, 2008 2:19 AM EST
Thanx Stoney,

Other than the premise of the story, the only part of the story that held my interest was the DNA portion which was well done. I also would have liked to have known who paid for all the lawyer fees, the DNA investigation, and the other costs associated with the many years of the appeal process.
Stoney, I have the same question. Masters commented on how much $$$ it cost, so I imagine he, or he and his supporters paid the exhorbitent fees.So the WINNERS here are the lawyers/liars and the court system as per usual. I hope Masters gets millions in his lawsuit. I would not put too much stock in DNA evidence as that can be planted or messed with by the PTBs,to make anyone look guilty, much too easily. Especially if the DNA scientists helped clear Jon Bonet Ramsay''s parents who are guilty as sin, for the ritual murder of their own daughter. After you have researched SRA, MK Ultra, and related subjects, you will find the whole court/judiciary/political systems are SATANIC/OCCULT to the core! I have researched this for close to 15 years, and I have my own personal experiences.
The good doctor Hammond would be my educated guess as the perp. He was conveniently "suicided" and all EVIDENCE destroyed, post haste. Who do you think were involved in those thousands of sick videotapes, and their coverup/destruction??? Maybe, the local "pillars of the community"???
(the top judges,lawyers,doctors,politicians,celebrities,etal)
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon December 2, 2008 2:01 AM EST
Thanx Stoney,

Other than the premise of the story, the only part of the story that held my interest was the DNA portion which was well done. I also would have liked to have known who paid for all the lawyer fees, the DNA investigation, and the other costs associated with the many years of the appeal process.
Stoney, I have the same question. Masters commented on how much $$$ it cost, so I imagine he, or he and his supporters paid the exhorbitent fees.So the WINNERS here are the lawyers/liars and the court system as per usual. I hope Masters gets millions in his lawsuit. I would not put too much stock in DNA evidence as that can be planted or messed with by the PTBs,to make anyone look guilty, much too easily. Especially if the DNA scientists helped clear Jon Bonet Ramsay''s parents who are guilty as sin, for the ritual murder of their own daughter. After you have researched SRA, MK ultra, and related subjects, you will find the whole court/judiciary/political systems are SATANIC/OCCULT to the core! I have researched this for close to 15 years, and I have my own personal experiences.
The good doctor Hammond would be my educated guess as the perp. He was conveniently "suicided" and all EVIDENCE destroyed, post haste. Who do you think were involved in those thousands of sick videotapes, and their coverup??? Maybe, the local "pillars of the community"???
(judges,lawyers,doctors,politicians,celebrities,etal)
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon December 2, 2008 1:54 AM EST
Thanx Stoney,

Other than the premise of the story, the only part of the story that held my interest was the DNA portion which was well done. I also would have liked to have known who paid for all the lawyer fees, the DNA investigation, and the other costs associated with the many years of the appeal process.
Stoney, I have the same question. Masters commented on how much $$$ it cost, so I imagine he, or he and his supporters paid the exhorbitent fees.So the WINNERS here are the lawyers/liars and the court system as per usual. I hope Masters gets millions in his lawsuit. I would not put too much stock in DNA evidence as that can be planted or messed with by the PTBs,to make anyone look guilty, much too easily. Especially if the DNA scientists helped clear Jon Bonet Ramsay''s parents who are guilty as sin, for the ritual murder of their own daughter. After you have researched SRA, MK ultra, and related subjects, you will find the whole court/judiciary/political systems are SATANIC/OCCULT to the core! I have researched this for close to 15 years, and I have my own personal experiences.
The good doctor Hammond would be my educated guess as the perp. He was conveniently "suicided" and all EVIDENCE destroyed, post haste. Who do you think were involved in those thousands of sick videotapes, and their coverup??? Maybe, the local "pillars of the community"???
(judges,lawyers,doctors,politicians,celebrities,etal)
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon December 2, 2008 1:51 AM EST
Thanx Stoney,

Other than the premise of the story, the only part of the story that held my interest was the DNA portion which was well done. I also would have liked to have known who paid for all the lawyer fees, the DNA investigation, and the other costs associated with the many years of the appeal process.
Stoney, I have the same question. Masters commented on how much $$$ it cost, so I imagine he, or he and his supporters paid the exhorbitent fees.So the WINNERS here are the lawyers/liars and the court system as per usual. I hope Masters gets millions in his lawsuit. I would not put too much stock in DNA evidence as that can be planted or messed with by the PTBs,to make anyone look guilty, much too easily. Especially if the DNA scientists helped clear Jon Bonet Ramsay''s parents who are guilty as sin, for the ritual murder of their own daughter. After you have researched SRA, MK ultra, and related subjects, you will find the whole court/judiciary/political systems are SATANIC/OCCULT to the core! I have researched this for close to 15 years, and I have my own personal experiences.
The good doctor Hammond would be my educated guess as the perp. He was conveniently "suicided" and all EVIDENCE destroyed, post haste. Who do you think were involved in those thousands of sick videotapes??? Maybe, the local "pillars of the community"???
(judges,lawyers,doctors,politicians,celebrities,etal)
Reply to this comment
by bigboy1069 December 1, 2008 10:47 PM EST
That one cop should have had his *** fired. Evidence led him in that direction, my aunt fanny. Lock him in a jail cell for something he didn''t do.
Reply to this comment
by bbpkr December 1, 2008 9:00 PM EST
maro5, you need to read the last few paragraphs Again-the quote you (erroneously) attributed to Broderick was made by the Victim''s brother, Tom Hettrick.
Reply to this comment
by 4score20 December 1, 2008 9:00 PM EST
The ex-boyfriend attacked her in the car and then panicked when she left and would not get back in the car. He stabbed her once in the back, freaked out and dragged her body several feet away from the road. The Doctor saw her being dragged, waited until the killer left, brought a flashlight to see her, went back to the house for a pair of surgical gloves, a small plastic bag and a scalpel. He then dragged her a bit further from the road and mutilated her. He took her parts home and stuck them in the freezer. When the police came to question him he probably freaked and disposed of the body parts and, I suspect, his first set of secret video tapes. He knew they''d incriminate him. The Doc was the only witness to her murder but couldn''t tell the cops because how could he explain not calling them that night?
Reply to this comment
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours on Facebook