Comments on: An Invisible Enemy

The NCIS Investigates The Death Of A Young Marine

Add a Comment See all 39 Comments
by sillyhuang09 December 9, 2007 11:04 PM EST
The elder woman seems to me a clever, witty, caniving, brutal wife. She married him not because love but for a purpose - catched a naiive, innocent,simple 19 year old young boy.
If not his wife posion him where and how his body organ carried 1000 times storng arsenic? Since the crice secene had been past there is hard to catch the evidents what she did to him this is almost a perfect muder to her. All the signs 100% prove she no one else has the motive to kill that poor boy. I pray the justice return to him, to his loving mother and someone like me soon.
Silly Huang
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 9, 2007 9:16 PM EST
How come he had 1,000 times to much arsenic in his system? How did it get there?

How come he was stone cold dead when the paramedics arrived? Did it take them a couple of hours to get there?

And what kind of selfish b***ch would be pressing her husband for $5,000 worth of fake boobs when they had $250 in the bank and four children to feed? Where''s the money he had saved to provide them?

I know it''s a strange world and I certainly haven''t lived in all of it. But in every case of spousal death (sudden, or lengthy illness either one)that I have encountered where two people have truly loved each other, it takes weeks for the spouse left behind to even let go enough to believe they''re not really coming home ever again.

Sounds to me like she had a little test run the week before to see how much it would take. Then delivered the lelthal dose and stood over him and watched him die. But then I''m no expert at all.

At this point, I''ll just pray that justice is served, whichever way it goes.
Reply to this comment
by rubypach December 9, 2007 7:52 PM EST
.i don''t see how people can grieve partying thats more like enjoying someone died.125,000=lifesexparty when i heard her 911 calls.so unreal.i love listening to 911 phone calls but if you paid attention to that one it was weird.it sounded like it was acted out.if you haven''t heard it you should listen to it.i can probably make the same voice as her.shes too fake for me to take true.everything she said about that day.how she moved and lost her computer...i mean she said she doesn;t know where it is.how can you lose something like that?making an appointment for new boobs when you don''t have any money only 150 in your bank account.guilty. freak. who loves partying and money , *** more than her children, more than her 250G marine husband.he had a Cardiac Arrhythmia, and his heart stopped at age 23!people''s heart don''t just stop for no reason.they found arsenic in his body more than 1,000 times of what you should have.at this rate it isn''t called cardiac Arrhythmia its called murder.
Reply to this comment
by rubypach December 9, 2007 7:51 PM EST
in my opinion she is guilty,a mother of 4 kids killing probably for money lets face it marines don''t make a lot of money.250G=yeah!some people will even kill for 10G and people say shes a mom she wouldn''t kill welcome to the real life many parents don''t care about their kids or they wouldn''t party knowing they have young one who need to be taken care of they would be home taking care of their kids seeing if they needed anything and just taking care of them, being with them period.oh but she put half of it in a trust fund for her kids...so would any person to cover up their tracks, i would be like. money what money. im not interested in money, i put half of in , in a trust fund for my kids, see! ha you see, no one wants to go to jail, no one is stupid.her husband was her shinning armor...lol and a few days later decides to party..i have been with my boyfriend for 2 years!.. two..i know that if he were ever to pass away i would not be partying in tj.it would be hard for me to go out and like someone else right away
Reply to this comment
by nlhd59 December 9, 2007 7:33 PM EST
I totally agree with pcaves, CarlyLaine, and jshiver2 that there was insufficient evidence to prove that this young woman murdered her husband. How dare other internet readers, such as Plumberry, accuse these people of being "hos" just because they have a different opinion than he/she does? How judgmental they are (and probably the jurors too considering the outcome of the trial). It just goes to show how ignorant people can be when they don''t look at the overall picture of a case and instead inflict their own prejudicial thoughts upon intelligent, thought-provoking individuals. That''s what is so wrong with the world today. Sometimes I even doubt that there can be unbiased juries at all in our court systems. Just because a woman gets implants and goes a little "crazy" after the death of a loved one doesn''t mean that she is capable of murder. Maybe we should instead focus our thoughts on murderers of whom we KNOW for a fact committed heinous crimes against innocent people. Until we know beyond a reasonable doubt that Cynthia Sommer killed her husband, we should refrain from judgment. Also, I applaud jshiver2 for his/her intelligent postings where some very good points were brought up about this case. My heart goes out to both families in this situation. Life must be unbearable for all of them.
Reply to this comment
by December 9, 2007 4:42 PM EST
Facts: (1) 1000 times acceptable level of Arsenic found in husband''s body, (2) arsenic poisoning symptoms occur within hour or so after ingesting and wife proven to be only person who was with victim during this time (unless you want to include his kids), (3) Arsenic easy to buy over internet and wife lies about getting a new computer and then can not explain what happened to the old one (yeah! right!), (4) surveillance video in nightclub shows wife having a blast on the dance floor just days after husband dies, (5) husband has $250,000 life insurance policy and wife is beneficiary, (6) wife schedules herself for a breast implants. Does this sound like an innocent, grieving wife? Get real!! She has guilt written all over her face.
Reply to this comment
by pcaves December 9, 2007 2:57 PM EST
Cynthia Sommer has been wrongfully accused and has spent the last 2 years imprisoned as a result. But she will be exonnerated. Of that I have no doubt. And no thanks to you, 48 Hours. I believe this case will generate new legislation and hopefully force an accountability on those that purposefully twist the facts to suit their made up stories full of ***, deceit, manipulation, and drama. Remember Walter Cronkite? He was one of the best examples of how to report the news, not sensationalize it. I''m very disappointed in 48 Hours.
Reply to this comment
by plumberry-2009 December 9, 2007 2:43 PM EST
I can''t believe all you people are assuming she is innocent! Are you all off your rockers?! As a MILITARY WIFE I have experienced many financial hardships with my children but have never even thought about what I would do if my husband died! This is a sad sad world that this ho got off the way she did. Are all you girls hos too? If my husband died, I would be GRIEVING with my children! Computers don''t go missing, widows don''t go partying or get new breasts. This ho planned it all out right down to the 911 call and if none if you can see that, you guys are just as sick too. The justice system has failed again. Put this murderering witch behind bars where she belongs. My heart goes out to his family SO SAD!

Reply to this comment
by pcaves December 9, 2007 2:38 PM EST
Todd Sommer did not die from arsenic poisoning. Todd Sommer died from Sudden Cardiac Arrhythmia. He developed a ventricular fibrillation after ingesting a lethal cocktail of a questionable antibiotic, Levaquin, sports drinks & Yellow Jackets (both containing Ephedra, i.e. fen fen, which has been removed from the market because it adfects the heart adversely and has caused many sudden deaths). He also was on a "float" medication to combat seasickness. Any one of these, or combined, could ultimately create a sudden death in an otherwise healthy marine. And let''s not forget, if any of us have experienced food poisoning, it''s brutal and leaves us in a very weakened state for days after.
Reply to this comment
by carlylaine December 9, 2007 12:07 PM EST
When I first watched Court TV concerning this case of Cynthia''s husband''s death...I kept thinking..."they haven''t proven she did it." I was absolutely shocked that because she went a little wayward after Todd''s demise that the jury would convict her OF MURDER.

I am happy that this may soon be over for her.

Not every death is from murder. I almost think that the prosecutors invent evidence just to have more feathers for their caps when they move to private defense practice. The more lives they destroy the more money they can demand.

Reply to this comment
by jwrhea December 9, 2007 11:30 AM EST
Somebody killed this healthy young man. But i fear that too much time had passed before anyone bothered to do anything about it. It would be next to impossible to find the evidence at this point. If the widow did it and gets away with it. Maybe we will in 10 years or so when money gets tight and her looks start to fail hear about her again as another husband dies. to die because of little *******. lol i have heard it all.
Reply to this comment
by jshiver2 December 9, 2007 10:55 AM EST
All of these comments that she made after Sgt. Sommer%u2019s death about money. How is it that none of these people mentioned any of this for more than a year later? If it was so suspicious as Ridley would like everyone to believe, why was there no through search of the home for more than two years? In fact, why take fifteen months to send these tissues off for heavy metals testing?

I do not know Cynthia Sommer. I came across the trial while it was showing on Court TV. In the beginning, I assumed that she was guilty because after all they had gotten the case inside a courtroom. I waited and waited for something to show me that this woman killed her husband but it never came. In fact, proof came in the form of scientific experts whom stated that this was not an arsenic poisoning. They explained why it could not be an arsenic poisoning. Not with sleazy escapades of Mrs. Sommer, but actual scientific proof.

I am very disappointed in the way you presented this story. I have always enjoyed 48 Hours Mystery but now I wonder how many other stories have been biased and untruthful the way this one was? How could you be so irresponsible?
Reply to this comment
by jshiver2 December 9, 2007 10:54 AM EST
On Sgt Sommer being deceased an hour or more before 911 was called; you were sure to tell about how Cassandra Stroud said that Todd%u2019s body was cold and mottled but you left out the part where the FIRST RESPONDERS got agonal breathing and a slight pulse. So much that attempted to revive him.

Eva Stoner conveniently left out the part where before they stopped for cigarettes that morning; she also stopped off at her barracks for some unknown reason. She also failed to talk about where on at least one occasion she was seen at the Sommer%u2019s home after Sgt. Sommer%u2019s death, partying it up with everyone else.

Now we get to NCIS special agent Mark Ridley. Is he lying in your story or was the account of the investigation lied about in court. In court, it was testified to that this case was closed. The tissues were sent off because they %u201Cwanted to close out the case%u201D and it was %u201Cnormal%u201D procedure.

Glenn Wagner failed to mention that he was the former boss of Jose Centeno who ran up the ENVIRONMENTAL lab that conducted these tests. I also did not hear mention that this was an UNACCREDITED environmental lab, not an ACCREDITED forensics lab, which most states, if not all require for forensics testing.
Reply to this comment
by jshiver2 December 9, 2007 10:51 AM EST
Terwillger%u2019s account of being able to purchase arsenic was also misleading. What he failed to disclose, and what the defense attorney found out after the trial, is that people cannot just go into these places and purchase arsenic the way he claimed. He could only do it in an official manner with paperwork to do so.
He also mentioned the %u201Cmissing%u201D computer but he failed to tell your reporter that they really don%u2019t know what they asked her about this. One said he asked her if this was the computer she had when Todd died. The other one said that he asked if this was the computer she had in California. She testified that it was the latter. And yes, she did have that computer in California. She purchased it a few months after Sgt. Sommer died. He failed to tell you that they never asked Cindy anymore about the computer. They did not tell her that they knew this was a new one and they never asked her what she did with the old. In fact, last night was the first time I had heard her speak of what happened to it. No one ever asked her before. Terwillger also failed to mention how they questioned Cindy. What about the broken tape recorder and them going back to their motel to %u201Cremember%u201D her statements? He did not tell you that this is normal practice for NCIS agents. It is a well known fact that they do not like to record statements and have had one case that I know of overturned because of that. Something always seems to happen to their recording equipment.
Reply to this comment
by jshiver2 December 9, 2007 10:47 AM EST
I am wondering if it would have been possible for you to be anymore biased in the report %u201CThe Invisible Enemy%u201D than you were last night. How could you run this story without all the facts and with the lies that were told?

Dr. Poklis and the two other witnesses that you so kindly omitted from your story are the crux of this case.
Where I can understand about the bad behavior being shown, the science in this case should have been explored much further than you did. Why wasn%u2019t it mentioned about the testing procedures, lack of proper training for these tests, lack of a standard operating procedure and the new machines? Why wasn%u2019t it brought out that somehow between the testing at AFIP and the testing at NMS labs that some of these tissues mysteriously gained weight?

Lee Cantrell%u2019s statement about the amount of arsenic that it would take to kill someone is the same misleading statement that Laura Gunn used in the trial. Yes, that amount may be fatal but there is no way it would come even close to equaling the amount that was found in Sgt. Sommer%u2019s tissues.
The substance that you showed in your article is misleading because according to the prosecutor, it was not in a powder form but something that she would have had to scrape out of ant traps. I will also add that it would have taken many, many of those ant traps to equal the amounts that they say they found.
CONT:
Reply to this comment
by irisheyes555 December 9, 2007 2:55 AM EST
I am a mother and grandmother, meaning I''m not naive and gullible. Usually in these cases, I''d say the spouse is guilty 99% of the time. But this young woman convinced me of her innocence through her interview on the show, and her mother''s testimony, even though that unfortunately lead to testimony regarding the young widow''s behavior. Her mother stated her daughter wouldn''t even know what arsenic is, and I know my youngest two daughters wouldn''t know what it is either, and they are around the same age. Additionally, many young people in that age group that I know personally sleep around in this manner, party like this, whether I like it or not. Other than her behavior, what have they got? Not much, except those breast implants, but even that was explained by the Valentine''s card that indicated her husband wanted her to have them too. But I agree, how can she get an untained jury after this 48 hours mystery show? Even before this show, I had read about her online several times, and I don''t live anywhere even close to where this happened. May the truth come out, and may the truth set Cynthia free. Just my opinion.
Reply to this comment
by shuswap3 December 9, 2007 2:38 AM EST
Having Just watched the episode, I think it indicated that the first day Tod Sommer was sick was after being in the field that day , possibly with his unit.

I''m wondering if the arsenic was given to him by one of his men that he spent the day with?
Reply to this comment
by dreaken December 9, 2007 2:27 AM EST
Selecting a new jury may be more difficult, but from seeing the show, it appears to be the right decision. She was convicted on her actions after the death, not the evidence.
Reply to this comment
by jvnsa88 December 9, 2007 1:43 AM EST
Cynthia Sommer was just granted a new trial this week, in large part on the basis of the admissibility of her behavior after Todd''s death. Guilty or not, she deserves an untainted jury pool; airing this story before that jury is chosen doesn''t serve justice at all.
Reply to this comment
See all 39 Comments
  • Recent Shows
  • Catch Her If You Can

    In Full: A con artist fakes her way into Harvard and Columbia and outsmarts the feds. Peter Van Sant reports

    Play CBS Video
  • A Case for Murder

    In Full: A young man is found dead from multiple stab wounds. His family searches for the killer, but was it suicide? Maureen Maher reports.

    Play CBS Video
Coming Up

Live to Tell: Krystal's Courage

Saturday, Nov. 28 | 10 p.m. ET/PT

A 10-year-old girl's story of survival and how she brought a serial killer to justice.

More