Comments on: Bite mark, DNA tie LAPD detective to 1986 murder
Add a Comment
- I have a suggestion: All weapons used for professional services should have ballistics tests done on them before being issued; a gun DNA data file, if you will. Should a weapon 'just happen' to go missing, it's on file already.
- Reply to this comment
- I'd like to know why the victim's husband Reutten didn't forcefully push the investigation in the right direction. He must have been pretty certain who killed his wife. Did the homicide detective purposely help the killer get away with murder? I think so. Maybe there should be at least 2 more indictments.
- Reply to this comment
- Read this QUICKLY because the DEVIL may block this from your eyes.
Like God told U in Matthew 5:34-37 and James 5:12 that ANYONE that SWEARS or takes an OATH of ANY KIND and is of the EVIL ONE and they will be judged by God.
You people twist God's words into a tapestry of LIES and accuse Him of inspiring His words 'OUT OF CONTEXT' and refuse to believe that their is NO EXCEPTIONS including your children that R in the Middle East killing people after they were sent there with a BALD FACED LIE by Bush saying they had 'weapons of destruction' after the CIA said NO THEY DIDN'T. They he LIED again and said 'MISSION ACCOMPLISHED' but he would NOT tell us what MISSION he was talking about and almost every IDIOT in the U.S. took his words as TRUTH.
ALL COPS are of the EVIL ONE. Tell me which one U know that didn't take an OATH.
It is very easy for a crook to get a job in RELIGIONS and LAW MAKING and ENFORCING their crappy laws against the poor of the U.S.
That is Y they have a plaque on Ellis Island saying give us your poor and hungry so they will have someone to pick on. - Reply to this comment
- You are so right!!! God knows all and sees all.
- Reply to this comment
- I hope not!!! It's obvious she did it.
- Reply to this comment
- The police definitely screwed up the investigation. There is no chain of custody record on the DNA, so that's going to be disputed. There are no notes from the lead detective ont he case. The witnesses memories are faded at beast. The case is too cold for an over-worked prosecutor to make a conviction for murder. She'll get off and my guess is she'll sue for false arrest.
- Reply to this comment
