CBS News/ March 19, 2012, 3:40 PM

Nuclear Iran: Sites and potential targets

CBS

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made it clear in a March 5, 2012,  White House meeting with President Obama, and subsequent remarks to American lawmakers and a powerful Jewish interest group, that his government is growing impatient with Iran's suspect nuclear program.

Israel is adamant that intelligence shows Iran is working behind closed doors at nuclear research labs, underground bunkers and military installations across the country to try to develop a nuclear weapon. At least some members of the U.S. intelligence community agree. Iran's Islamic cleric-led government insists their nuclear program is strictly for the production of electricity and medical isotopes.

For more than a decade, the United Nations' nuclear monitoring agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has fought for access to Iranian facilities where intelligence suggests work possibly linked to a secret weapons program. Many sites have been inspected, yielding volumes of technical reports which paint, at best, an ominous but murky picture. There has not been definitive proof Iran is trying to build a nuclear weapon. But on almost every visit, IAEA inspectors leave Iran complaining that the regime allowed them incomplete access or information.

Israel - within range of some of Iran's missiles - feels it cannot take a chance with a country which has publicly vowed to destroy it. The Israelis argue a strike should be carried out soon, or it may be too late to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapons capability.

While the White House continues pushing Netanyahu to give diplomacy and sanctions more time to persuade the Iranians, many in the Obama administration seem to have accepted, perhaps reluctantly, the "strong likelihood" of a preemptive Israeli strike on Iran. President Obama has said the United States will "have Israel's back," even if it does launch a strike. (At left, click to see Obama and Netanyahu speak together at the White House)

Israel's military has, for fairly obvious reasons, not listed the sites it would try to target in a preemptive strike on Iran. However, public knowledge of Iran's nuclear and military installations and past reports from IAEA inspections sheds light on some likely locations.

What follows is a look at those theoretical targets and some of the other sites vital to Iran's nuclear program. The list has not been and is unlikely to ever be confirmed by either Israeli or U.S. officials.

It also does not include myriad manufacturing locations across the country where Iran produces the components for its enrichment process, or research and development sites which are unknown or unconfirmed by the IAEA. It also excludes the conventional military installations and missile facilities around the Islamic Republic that Israel may try to incapacitate in any preemptive strike.

9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
seadoosnipe says:
I don't know how many people have had direct contact with Iran, or know specifically how the Islamic regime works, but I have. I was there in 1979 when our embassy members were taken hostage for 444 days. I was their when the Shah of Iran as overthrown. The Islamists will stop at nothing to have the world dominated by Sharia Law. It's my opinion that most religious people in the world, spread the word in their religious belief, but they still allow freedoms to choose their fate. The Islamists do not see it like that. They want you to either reform to believe in the Quran, or your labeled as infidel and put to death. That's it, plain and simple. Their public address to destroy Israel should not be taken lightly. They mean what they say. If you've never been there, or experienced the Islamic fanatics first hand, then I suggest you at least keep an eye over your left shoulder. But, my statement is not a blanket statement either. The Islamic faith is not violent by nature. I know muslims who worship Allah and the Quran, and are great people, but just like in any faith, fanatics who can take up power of a state, are very dangerous.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
drrealitycheck says:
The US has been fighting wars of conquest for over 40 years now without success. We're simply not capable of continuing this under any President. It's Israels fight and Obama and Germany gave them the military technology to do it. Israel and the US have never fought together anyway.
reply
thomascapitalmgmt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are definitely a Paulbot and an imbecile that has no clue as to historical facts. Name ONE war of CONQUEST? Not one. We do not occupy any land of conquest.

2) Israel needs our DIRECT support, aid and alliance. Israel and America fight side by side everyday of the week for decades..........wake up Paulbot
linkicon reporticon emailicon
B_Erhart says:
Why is not a name attributed to this manifestation of MENTAL ILLNESS.

Children acting violently taboo. Soldier shoots umpteen civilians taboo.

State psychopaths advocate attacking/bombing - political diplomacy.

Serious delusions being implemented as policy. When the smoke clears

and cost of lives realized - turning back the clock not an option.

People who READ and believe this mindless drivel MENTALLY ILL!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notreich says:
Shouldn't the cold water that the Pentagon (as well as over-whelming numbers of former Israeli military and intelligence figures) is throwing on this idea of attacking Iran have any effect on this? And with it the rise in gas prices?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ajk_cbsnews says:
Tell Net-N-Yahoo to jump off the short peer! The Israeli government has committed enough war crimes, already!
reply
thomascapitalmgmt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dear liar:

PM Netanyahu committed war crimes? Israel a terrorist state. You are either: 1) a paul supporter and therefore an isolationist anti-Semite or 2) completely beyond reason.

5,000 rocket attacks last year alone into Israel by TERRORISTS you IMBECILE
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DavidFPawlowski says:
The flawed fundamental assumption employed by Israel and the US that includes its latest 'war gamer' scenario is that Iran does NOT have nuclear weapons. The media should really challenge this assumption given the Iranian flights to North Korea since that nation left the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. It strongly begs the question given the "known known's of Iran's heavy trading for oil, food, precious metals and hard currency for sophisticated weapons systems what else did the Imam's get for their riches? Would it really surprise the west if Iran has nukes ready to go in an underground Quds facility with a few floors run by the North Koreans? Similar basing of nukes was done by the US throughout the cold war in Europe, Japan, South Korea and elsewhere. Such a basing strategy would allow the head of the Iranian military to claim in one sentence to not have nukes on Iranian soil, while knowing they are actually on North Korean military mission soil in the basement of that Quds mountain facility ready for mounting on the Iranian North Korean made medium range ballistic missiles targeted at Israel today. Think about it folks and that doesn't even cover Iran's interest in "isotopes" (e.g. balotechnic isomer weapons).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
says:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made it clear in a March 5, 20012. Wow... We are on 20012?
reply