Dow
     -27.02
12938.67
-0.21%
|
     -4.55
1357.66
-0.33%
|
     +0.00
14147.55
+0.00
|
     -15.40
2933.17
-0.52%
|
     -0.16
54.37
-0.30%
|
     +0.00
119.20
+0.00
|
     +0.07
2.07
+3.54%
January 26, 2012 11:10 AM

La. oil officials dissatisfied with Obama speech

(AP)  NEW ORLEANS — A day after President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, petroleum industry representatives called Wednesday for a more-aggressive energy development policy, saying the United States could take care of more of its petroleum needs while cutting dependence on unstable foreign oil supplies.

During the annual meeting of the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association, industry officials said the formula should include shale oil production, offshore drilling in more areas and the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline that would bring oil from Canada to Texas.

"The game changer is the oil sands of Canada and the shale plays," said LMOGA head Chris John. "It has the potential to make us energy independent. Every barrel we bring in from Canada is one less barrel we have to buy from Hugo Chavez."

On Tuesday night, the president directed his administration to develop a plan for safe extraction of natural gas from shale deposits, which the White House said would support more than 600,000 jobs. Obama said the administration is moving forward with rules to ensure that safe drilling practices are followed and the types of chemicals in the fracking method are disclosed for operations on public lands.

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involves the high-pressure injection of millions of gallons of water, along with sand and chemical additives, deep underground to extract natural gas trapped in shale rock. The technique is being expanded rapidly to produce oil from shale.

The industry has long contended that fracking is safe, but environmentalists and some residents who live near drilling sites say it has poisoned groundwater. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has started a study of the issue.

Obama also called again for an end to drilling tax breaks for the oil and natural gas industry — a proposal that Congress has largely ignored, even when Democrats controlled both chambers.

John said eliminating those breaks would merely drive oil exploration overseas.

"These drilling operators are very mobile and they can move easily," he said.

Randall Luthi, head of the National Ocean Industries Association, repeated a longstanding industry call to open up more of the coastal United States to offshore drilling. Obama made a move in that direction shortly before the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010, but quickly backed off.

During his speech Obama said he was directing his administration "to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources." At the meeting, federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management director Tommy Beaudreau said the president was referring to the current proposed five-year offshore lease plan that includes 12 lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico, plus potential sales in the Chuckchi and Beaufort seas off Alaska and the Cook Inlet in Alaska.

"Together, the planning areas included in our proposed five-year program encompass 75 percent of the undiscovered, but technically recoverable oil and gas resources offshore of the United States," Beaudreau said.

Luthi said too much of the U.S. drilling plan continues to be centered on the Gulf "where we have been looking and looking again for 30 years." At the same time, significant long-term finds are coming from new areas of overseas drilling, such as Brazil and Africa, taking away U.S. jobs and revenue, he said.

The president blocked the Keystone pipeline last week, saying officials did not have enough time to review an alternative route to avoid environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska. The $7 billion project proposed by Calgary-based TransCanada would carry tar sands oil from western Canada across six states to refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast. Industry officials in Louisiana say part of that oil also would be sent to Louisiana refineries.

The United States could lose out to other countries if it waits too long to take advantage of TransCanada's plan, said Gary Heminger, chief executive of Marathon Petroleum Corp. He said Asian countries are investing in Canadian oil sands.

"We have a great ally of the United States willing to share that resource," Heminger said. "We want this Canadian oil to come to the United States."

After Obama's speech, U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., said she was glad to see the president's proposal on domestic energy production, but called on the administration to speed up offshore drilling permits in the Gulf, saying the current pace "continues to be far too slow."

Her Republican counterpart, U.S. Sen. David Vitter, also said he was glad to hear the president speak "a fair amount" about U.S. energy.

"The question is if he'll be serious about that and follow up with action," Vitter said.


Scientific American


© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by harrymorgan1 January 26, 2012 4:14 PM EST
In Louisiana the biggest problem with drilling is the amount of water used from aquifers. Millions to complete one well. Drill baby drill, but do not destroy our water sources.




September, 2009, Louisiana Ground Water Resources Commission Meeting report because of the Chicot Aquifer levels they noted: prevent the oil -- or the heavy industry from around the Lake Charles areas from drawing from the Chicot Aquifer. http://dnr.louisiana.gov/assets/docs/conservation/documents/transcript91609.pdf




According to a USGS the Chicot Aquifer is the sole source of fresh water for southwestern Louisiana and has already shown signs of dropped levels, especially in the area north of Crowley. http://la.water.usgs.gov/nawqa/gwsus1.htm






April, 2010 Testing continues on S. Caddo water wells contaminated by natural gas http://www.ksla.com/story/12333193/testing-continues-on-s-caddo-water-wells-contaminated-by-natural-gas?redirected=true




Dec, 2010, 36 Louisiana parishes declared disaster areas. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry 36 Louisiana parishes designated disaster areas due to 2010 drought. http://deltafarmpress.com/government/36-louisiana-parishes-declared-disaster-areas




March, 2011 Haynesville natural gas field most productive in the U.S. Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer around Shreveport, which historically had provided good water supplies for residents and agriculture started to run dry when producers drilled a large number of wells for water. http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/03/haynesville_natural_gas_field.html




March, 2011 Already the number of producing wells is more than triple what it was a year ago. Another 930 wells are permitted and waiting drilling, being drilled or awaiting the complex hydraulic fracturing process that releases gas from the shale. http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/03/haynesville_natural_gas_field.html
Reply to this comment
by scotttx January 26, 2012 1:20 PM EST
It is hard to trust big Oil always saying one thing and doing another, To trust them at there words sorry I can't, Not very reliable, As for the Tax breaks come on just common sense will tell you, If it is worthwhile to drill your not really thinking about the tax breaks your looking at how much profit your going to make off the well. And for the Keystone blame the republican for trying to side step the review process, It must be built as safe as possible with the best way to prevent a even larger disaster shall we not forget the Gulf Oil Spill and what it did to the gulf coast. Louisiana official sure ******* a lot with oil lapping at there shores. And with this pipeline crossing the middle of the bread basket that provide our grains for food and water for millions, I think it is well worth the extra effort to make it as safe as possible, Sorry not buying into big Oil Claim or Much of the Republican claims.
Reply to this comment
by IdislikeGovernmentGreed January 26, 2012 1:19 PM EST
If Oil companies are forced to guarantee that they can drill shale oil and not contaminate water supply's then ok but jail time if they do no ...questions asked...And Canada oil pipe is a pipe dream it was said from the start if you go back and read original first run articles ..there will be nothing but oil refined and shipped out to foreign lands nothing for the U.S. oil companies are the only benefiting parties
Reply to this comment
by Congressive January 26, 2012 1:08 PM EST
Does anybody buy this nonsense? "It has the potential to make us energy independent. Every barrel we bring in from Canada..." will make us energy independent? What? Gibberish in two back to back sentences. Energy efficiency, not production, is the ONLY path to energy independence in a global market.

Besides, when did we nationalize our refineries and oil fields? Since when do profits from any oil business all stay here? Do we WANT to destroy our air and water so China can buy cheap gas from "us"?

"The United States could lose out to other countries" - lose out what, exactly? An obliterated national aquifer? Refinery byproducts in our air and water? Zero tax revenue from big oil as usual? Since when does the "United States" = big private oil? Multinational big private oil could lose out to other multinational big private oil. WHO CARES? Cut consumption and all their prices go down, and all our planet gets cleaner.

Good to hear all those big oil refinery profits are going straight into taxpayer coffers, right? Mighty generous of big oil, don't you think? No, you don't think? Hope this "journalist/PR firm" got his/her $10,000...
Reply to this comment
by elSurfeador January 26, 2012 1:07 PM EST
The oil from Canada may or may not go to China. They would have to run a pipeline to the west coast of Canada and have already been denied permission to do so. As such, it's in a similar situation as the Keystone project. This particular kind of oil is extremely toxic and if it could be transported safely most people wouldn't have an objection (should still be routed away from aquifers though). The problem is the oil industry says their pipelines are safe meanwhile they have constant leaks and spills. Provide a safe and reliable transport system, keep it away from sensitive areas (aquifers) and this project would move forward. The oil industry keeps hoping that peoples thirst for oil will overshadow the issues that people should be concerned about. Fix the problems and be honest about it. When you operate as though your profits are all that matters we all lose. If as a country we got serious about conservation, renewable energy and additional sources of oil, we'd be in a great position to be energy independent. Oil company money thrown at politicians is the biggest obstacle to America working toward a comprehensive solution.
Reply to this comment
by Bear589 January 26, 2012 1:01 PM EST
That nitwit couldn't care less about what effect his hysterical policies have on America. He cares about enforcing his ideology. If you think it's bad NOW, you'd better hope he doesn't become a lame duck, because if that happens, it'll make eveything that went before look like tea and crumpets with the queen.
Reply to this comment
by Congressive January 26, 2012 1:16 PM EST
Name one example of this "ideology" of which you speak. PPACA (ObamaCare) is to the right of RomneyCare, no socialist ideology there. GM was bailed out in December of 2008 by executive order BY BUSH, not Obama. Obama then returned GM to the markets and recovered some of Bush's losses. No socialist ideology there.

I hear this a lot, but so far, us democratic socialists aren't getting anything from this prez.
by FM12345 January 26, 2012 12:45 PM EST
I don't get it. I keep hearing from the Right "Obama spends to much, we spend to much" "Government spends to much"

Yet when we are about to STOP giving tax breaks to oil companies who clearly don't need it, the bill STALLS in congress because GOP doesn't want to give up those tax breaks? Tell me who do the Republicans represent these days?
Reply to this comment
by kathleenpost January 26, 2012 12:45 PM EST
Two days ago article's were in print how the natural gas reserves are in excess supply,so the industry is stopping production to raise the price nationally.Also that Canada and the US oil industry's want to export gas to Mexico.That is why they want the Keystone pipeline to sell our oil and gas to Mexico.We would put up with the polluting and fracturing and Mexico gets the product.This must stop.Don't pollute America is a terrible way ,to profit the oil industry in other country's.This article say's it will be used in our country and that is very misleading.Stop this gas fracturing in our country,do not expand it.Our children and grandchildren will suffer cancer and the oil company's get the profit.
Reply to this comment
by sickofrepukes January 26, 2012 12:44 PM EST
tex , sounds like your mad. No one said they didn't want oil. Why should America give the wealthiest company's in America huge amounts of money to do it. They don't need my money to drill for oil. And no i don't want your oil. I have a 6 thousand watt solar array , 2 wind mills. Geo thermal for heating and air. Mostly heat with wood in inserts in my 2500 sq home. The wife works 5 minutes from home. And i work at home. So the gas i buy is nothing. I want this gas meter removed my house. I don't need them. If a oil company needs huge subsidies to function then those billy's in the south don't no how to run business or they are paying there labor to much.
Reply to this comment
by 1steve9999 January 26, 2012 12:33 PM EST
Toyota will tell you that the Prius has saved
over a billion gallons of gasoline. Because of
conservation we are selling refined product (gasoline)
back to Mexico. We have excess refining capacity.
Conservation is working but it hasn't done anything for the price.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook