Walker turning down $37 million for health care
MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin will turn down $37 million from the federal government that had been awarded to help implement health care exchanges under President Barack Obama's health care reform law, Gov. Scott Walker said Wednesday.
Walker announced in December that Wisconsin would not pursue implementing the exchange until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the law.
But he did not say whether the state would take the money. On Wednesday Walker said he was notifying the federal government that Wisconsin was turning down the Early Innovator Grant, saying it didn't make sense to commit to reforms that could have a devastating economic impact.
"Stopping the encroachment of ObamaCare in our state, which has the potential to have a devastating impact on Wisconsin's economy, is a top priority. Wisconsin has been a leader and innovator in health care reform for two decades, and we have achieved a high level of health insuranEce coverage without federal mandates," Walker said in a statement.
The American Cancer Society called the Republican governor's action a move backward.
"A robust, consumer-friendly health exchange designed specifically for Wisconsin would greatly expand access to care to those who need it most, while preserving what already works. It's unfortunate the (Walker) administration is deciding to ignore this reality," said Allison Miller, Wisconsin government relations director for the American Cancer Society.
The exchanges are designed to help consumers and small businesses compare health plans and increase competition by requiring insurers to offer more plans and provide more information.
While Wisconsin has been a leader in providing access to affordable quality health care to as many people as possible, "too many people in our state still find themselves unable to attain coverage, especially those touched by cancer," Miller said in a news release.
State Rep. Sandy Pasch, D-Whitefish Bay, accused Walker of playing politics "with the health of our communities,"
"This brazen attempt to score short-sighted political points with extreme partisan interests by playing chicken with federal law will take Wisconsin's health care decisions out of our hands and give them to the federal government. It is penny-wise, pound-foolish, and most certainly presents a missed opportunity for Wisconsin to control its own destiny in designing a quality, consumer-friendly exchange," Pasch said in a statement.
Robert Kraig, executive director of Citizen Action of Wisconsin, said Walker's decision was a mistake because the exchanges could have provided consumers with more options for their health care. Kraig told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he believes the state had spent about $1 million of the federal money. He said he was unsure if the state would need to repay that money if it is not moving forward with the exchange.
While Democrats say it's important to prepare for the new federal health care law, Republicans say it could be struck down. The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled several days of oral arguments for the end of March to consider whether the law is constitutional.
© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Walker announced in December that Wisconsin would not pursue implementing the exchange until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the law.
But he did not say whether the state would take the money. On Wednesday Walker said he was notifying the federal government that Wisconsin was turning down the Early Innovator Grant, saying it didn't make sense to commit to reforms that could have a devastating economic impact.
"Stopping the encroachment of ObamaCare in our state, which has the potential to have a devastating impact on Wisconsin's economy, is a top priority. Wisconsin has been a leader and innovator in health care reform for two decades, and we have achieved a high level of health insuranEce coverage without federal mandates," Walker said in a statement.
The American Cancer Society called the Republican governor's action a move backward.
"A robust, consumer-friendly health exchange designed specifically for Wisconsin would greatly expand access to care to those who need it most, while preserving what already works. It's unfortunate the (Walker) administration is deciding to ignore this reality," said Allison Miller, Wisconsin government relations director for the American Cancer Society.
The exchanges are designed to help consumers and small businesses compare health plans and increase competition by requiring insurers to offer more plans and provide more information.
While Wisconsin has been a leader in providing access to affordable quality health care to as many people as possible, "too many people in our state still find themselves unable to attain coverage, especially those touched by cancer," Miller said in a news release.
State Rep. Sandy Pasch, D-Whitefish Bay, accused Walker of playing politics "with the health of our communities,"
"This brazen attempt to score short-sighted political points with extreme partisan interests by playing chicken with federal law will take Wisconsin's health care decisions out of our hands and give them to the federal government. It is penny-wise, pound-foolish, and most certainly presents a missed opportunity for Wisconsin to control its own destiny in designing a quality, consumer-friendly exchange," Pasch said in a statement.
Robert Kraig, executive director of Citizen Action of Wisconsin, said Walker's decision was a mistake because the exchanges could have provided consumers with more options for their health care. Kraig told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he believes the state had spent about $1 million of the federal money. He said he was unsure if the state would need to repay that money if it is not moving forward with the exchange.
While Democrats say it's important to prepare for the new federal health care law, Republicans say it could be struck down. The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled several days of oral arguments for the end of March to consider whether the law is constitutional.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- TGI Fridays nailed for doctoring booze
- Amy's Baking Company could face legal 'nightmare'
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- Meat labels getting facelift under new USDA rules
- The Donald prevails in fraud suit
- Turn off Windows 8 with one click
2 Comments Add a Comment
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- I *really* hate our governor. He's already cost WI taxpayers well over $100m due to his little train hissey-fit, now he's going to cost us another $40m in additional federal funds. For someone who was elected to help out the WI taxpayer, he sure has done whatever he could to completely screw us over...
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Walker is moving Wisconsin forward; In 1920 Moscow did not allow due process the ruler did anything he wanted too. The law was only for the people not the dictator. In 1920 Moscow had voter suppression. In 1920 Moscow did not allow freedom to assemble. In 1920 Moscow did not allow free speech. In 1920 Moscow all of Stalin's followers were allowed to bare arms. In 1920 Moscow they had thousands of political prisoners. In 1920 Moscow was one party rule. In 1920 Moscow they had slave labor and wages. In 1920 Moscow healthcare was a myth for most. In 1920s Moscow liberty and justice was a myth. It was all about conviction rates to make the Dictator happy. In 1920`s Moscow the Dictator robbed from the poor people and destroyed the countryside for personal gain. In 1920`s Moscow the dictator sold state properties for personal gain and a complete loss to the state. I am sorry. The date is 2012 in Madison not Moscow. They are the things Walker did to move Wisconsin forward to the roaring twenties like in Stalin's Moscow. The place David Koch's father grew up and made his first millions building power plants for Uncle Josef Stalin. Walker has plan and as he said. It is working..
- reply
