Dash
By

Bailey Johnson /

CBS News/ April 20, 2012, 1:10 PM

Judge: Physics did not get Krioukov out of ticket

Dmitri Krioukov

Dmitri Krioukov

/ Dmitri Krioukov
(CBS News/AP) A San Diego court commissioner is denying that a scientist's physics paper had anything to do with her dismissing his $200 traffic ticket. CBSNews.com reported this week that Dmitri Krioukov of the University of California, San Diego, used an equation-filled paper on the physics of a car in motion to successfully appeal a ticket for failure to stop.

As it turns out, all those pages of post-grad mathematics weren't even necessary.

Superior Court Commissioner Karen Riley told U-T San Diego that she listened to the physics argument but much of it went over her head.

"The ruling was not based on his physics explanation," Riley told the San Diego paper. "It was based on the officer's view ... The officer wasn't close enough to the intersection to have a good view."

Even the $400 fine was hyperbole, according to the commissioner.

"He's exaggerating," she told U-T San Diego. "It never would've been $400. Even if he had traffic school, it would've been $287."

Krioukov was unavailable for comment, but is still probably happy to be out of a fine - physics or no physics.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
4 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mouthematician333 says:
"...was not based on his physics explanation..." No, of course not - physicists are great at analyzing physical phenomena...explaining them, though? Not so much, a lot of the time. It just so happened, that his paper explained how an observer/officer could possibly mistake what they perceived if...they weren't "close enough to the intersection to have a good view."
So, while the ruling wasn't based on his explanation, I wonder what the outcome would have been if he had not brought the court's attention to the officer's viewpoint...and going so far as to write a formal paper up on it - probably has a little more impact than simply saying "But, he couldn't see me!"
(P.S. - No way to say this in the U.S. without sounding arrogant: "post-grad mathematics"? 2nd year physics/calculus, maybe.)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bushleguedro says:
I've been to court in San Diego to fight tickets and the judge sounds like most of the ones I've seen. They will go to any length to avoid admitting that the police are faking their data. When shown that the it is impossible for the police to have measured/estimated/observed the speeds they write on a ticket, the judge will come up with some other reason to dismiss the ticket. Just like in this case.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
davemartin12345 says:
Something tell me that self-important windbag Krioukov fellow wouldn't be tolerated anywhere outside the realm of academia.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
davemartin12345 says:
Something tell me that self-important gasbag Krioukov fellow wouldn't be tolerated anywhere outside the realm of academia.
reply