Dash
By

CBSNews /

CBS News/ April 12, 2012, 3:51 PM

Brake override system proposed by regulators

AP
(AP) - New cars and light trucks would have to have override systems to prevent unintended acceleration in instances where the driver steps on the gas pedal and brake at the same time or accelerator control systems disconnect, under new federal regulations proposed Thursday.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration proposed changing accelerator testing standards for most new cars and many trucks and buses. The override systems, which automatically activate if the accelerator and brake touched simultaneously, would be required in passenger cars, trucks and buses weighing less than 10,000 pounds. Most large trucks and buses weigh more than that, however.

Many vehicle models already come equipped with such brake-throttle override systems.

The proposal is an outgrowth of investigations two years ago into claims that electronic defects were causing unintended acceleration in some Toyota models. An investigation by NHTSA and a separate study by NASA concluded that there were no electronic defects, but that in some cases drivers had inadvertently pressed the brake and gas pedal at the same time or that gas pedals had become trapped.

One accident that gained attention was the August 2009 high-speed crash of a Lexus near San Diego, Calif., that resulted in the deaths of four people. Investigators determined that the driver, a veteran California highway patrolman, had applied the brake of the loaned car but was unable to override the accelerator, which was trapped by a floor mat.

In February 2011, Toyota Motor Corp. recalled 2.17 million vehicles in the United States to address accelerator pedals that could become entrapped in floor mats or jammed in driver's-side carpeting, prompting NHTSA to close its investigation. The agency also fined Toyota $50 million for not recalling millions of vehicles in a timely fashion.

The proposed standard aims to minimize the risk that drivers will lose control of their vehicles as a result of either accelerator-control system disconnections or accelerator-pedal sticking or floor-mat entrapment, the safety administration said.

"While NHTSA's defect investigation program will continue to monitor and consider consumer complaints of any potential vehicle safety issues, this proposal is one way the agency is helping keep drivers safe and continuing to work to reduce the risk of injury from sticky pedals or pedal entrapment issues," David Strickland, NHTSA's administrator, said in a statement.

The auto industry urged two years ago that override systems be standard on new vehicles, said Gloria Bergquist, vice president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. She said the alliance would review NHTSA's proposal.

The public has 60 days in which to comment. Final regulations are expected sometime after that.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
4 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
venusvegasvada says:
If a person can't figure out the difference between the gas pedal and the brake pedal they shouldn't be driving a car.

The only way to make a car 100% safe is to park it in the garage with no battery and no fuel.

How about a law for that?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HighPerformanceDriver says:
Have a little compassion for your fellow humans and recognize that the person who lost life did not have the benefit of 20-20 hind-sight of the cause to assist in taking action.

To the armchair drivers above who know it all wait, until it happens to you and then comment again. Most law enforcement vehicles have ABS and officers are taught how to use it properly, which means not pumping the brake, but holding it down steadily.

It is possible in some cars to have one's foot fully on the brake, holding it down steadily as is supposed to be done in a car with ABS, and have the edge of one's shoe also holding down the gas pedal. Wearing your winter boots today and not your ballet slippers?

When you have just gone full bore down the straight-away at Laguna Seca, now make a decision when the brake is on and the car is slowing down but not enough. Take your foot off the brake or not? Turn the key off and lose power steering or not? Sorry, out of time. You are in the round rock run-off bed with your wheels buried and car requiring a tow regardless of your choice.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
blehblehblahblah says:
It's not clear why the industry would have fought this for so long since, in any modern car with an electronic throttle, a simple software mod will add the feature. It's also not clear how the industry created the problem (of idiot drivers).

But then, perhaps, the industry did fight it because there's a good reason not to put more useless garbage in cars just to protect the handful of idiots who can't handle driving? Nope, the industry is happy to put nanny-features in cars; and some in the industry have, apparently, been asking for this requirement for a while. Too bad. Tougher licensing is a much better solution.

Learn how to drive and keep your car in good condition (e.g., keep the floor mats away from the pedals). Problem solved.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alphaa10000 says:
Long, long overdue. As with most state and federal regulation, the proposed measure comes about after industry failed to address the situation in a reasonably timely manner.

A reasonably prompt address of a problem is one thing, but industry sometimes fights tooth and nail, attempting to "buy off" regulators or its favorite legislators, rather than take any action at all. It's all about the money involved in fixing a problem industry created.

Toyota admitted some crashes (and by implication, consequent fatalities) were related to jammed floor mats, but as relatively inexpensive as floor mats might be, took no action at first. Apparently, Toyota was afraid confessing a fault in its product was far more damaging than the potential toll of highway deaths.

What Toyota suffered, instead, was massive damage to consumer trust in the Toyota label. The company presented itself to consumers as greedy, indifferent and callous to the point of exposing their customers to needless harm.
reply