By

Steve Vernon /

MoneyWatch/ February 4, 2013, 6:50 AM

Why traditional retirement is dead

(MoneyWatch) Let's face it: The traditional kind of retirement in which people exit the workforce sometime in their sixties just isn't going to happen for the vast majority of Americans. Let's take a brief look at the sobering statistics that support this conclusion:

  • Social Security alone provides a good foundation of retirement income, but it was never meant to provide all or even most of someone's retirement income. The average monthly benefit for new retired workers in 2011 was $1,241; for married couples, add $463 per month for the average spouse's benefit. The maximum monthly benefit for someone retiring at full retirement age (age 66) in 2012 was $2,513.

  • According to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, only 42 percent of workers between ages 25 and 64 participate in any type of employer-sponsored retirement plan. As a result, about one-third of households enter retirement without having drawn such benefits.

  • The median 401(k) and IRA balances for households headed by someone age 55 to 64 is $120,000. For retirement at age 65, this level of savings would generate a lifetime retirement income that ranges from only $400 to $600 per month.

  • According to a report from Fidelity Investments, a 65-year-old couple retiring at age 65 would need about $240,000 in the bank to pay for medical expenses throughout their retirement.

  • Due to political disputes in Washington over how to handle the federal deficit, important safety net programs such as Social Security and Medicare are threatened with cutbacks.

  • Although many people expect to continue working in their retirement years, half of existing retirees say they left the workforce unexpectedly due to health issues, disabilities or changes at their employer such as downsizing or closure. These people needed to tap into retirement savings and other financial resources sooner than they expected, and they were less able to rely on wages for income.

  • According to the federal Centers for Disease Control, about two-thirds of all Americans are considered overweight or obese, resulting in increased rates of chronic disease and medical bills, especially as they age.

  • More seniors are entering their retirement years with debt problems. According to the AARP, for example, 25 percent of all bankruptcy filings in 2011 were by people 55 years of age and over. The number of seniors filing bankruptcy also increased by 134 percent from the previous year.

  • Only 14 percent of people surveyed by the Employee Benefit Research Institute report feeling confident that they'll have enough money for a comfortable retirement.

Is this how we hoped our retirement years would turn out? Of course not. Does it stink? Yes, and I'm sorry things are turning out this way. If you're so inclined, you can find lots of sources to blame for this unfortunate situation. Your political party, the economy, Wall Street, the government, advertising. You can even blame yourself for not saving enough or spending too much.

But what good does blame do? Maybe the blame is appropriate, maybe it isn't. If it makes you feel better to blame somebody, go ahead and get it out of your system.  Then realize it doesn't change the situation. All you're left with is a heap of blame and no solutions.

Should our government and business leaders be concerned about this situation? Absolutely! And there are sincere leaders out there who are trying to make a difference. But I'm not holding my breath waiting for help anytime soon. Instead, we should focus on the steps we can take to improve our situation today, tomorrow and in the immediate years to come.

In spite of the problems I've summarized above, I'm optimistic that Americans will be resourceful, resilient and creative and will rise to the occasion. We need a more realistic vision for our retirement years, a vision that gives us more control over our future and makes the best use of all the resources at our disposal. Stay tuned for my next post, which will provide an overview of that vision.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
  • Steve Vernon On Twitter »

    >> View all articles

    For more than 35 years, consulting actuary Steve Vernon helped large employers design and manage their retirement programs. Now he's a Research Scholar for the Stanford Center on Longevity, where he helps collect, direct, and disseminate research that will improve the financial security of seniors. He also delivers retirement planning workshops and has authored Money for Life: Turn Your IRA and 401(k) Into a Lifetime Retirement Paycheck and Recession-Proof Your Retirement Years.

9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jntlw says:
Time for a senior REVOLUTION!
reply
notdatkindacoke replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The 1 million walker march/wobble through Washington, DC. Does DC have enough cafeterias to handle that kind of a crowd?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AlanZShore says:
Maybe, if the government really cared, they'd have health care coverage for all people, then seniors can retire in the security that they will be able to FINANCIALLY survive, in spite of a medical condition. That it'll take $240k in medical expenses in retirement is a shame on the US. There are so many other countries that have excellent medical coverage for its people, and the great USA still refuses to help its people. SHAME ON THE USA!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
twmat311 says:
Let's add to this the periodic "correction" factor: how do you protect yourself, if you CAN save enough, from the market belly-flopping every few years? And this is in alleged safe funds, not company stocks.

In 2009-2010, I was cheered by my financial advisor for having a 45% return for the year - AFTER losing almost 50%! I reminded him of this, and got "well...yeah." And I was told I was one of the lucky ones!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WillowSunstar says:
If this is true, then more needs to be done to combat age discrimination. A lot of workplaces are not willing to hire 70 year-olds.
reply
twmat311 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I hear job seekers are now getting told 4-year degrees are overkill, and 2-year tech and "worker bee" degrees are in demand. Same time, "experienced" people are forced aside for cheaper labor - who can't get hired because of lack of experience.

The only ones who understand the workforce rules anymore are the HR types. They need to share it with everybody else.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Cowdogpete says:
Banks will pay 4% on CD's when you're ready to pay 10% on new car loans.
They go hand in hand.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dman6015 says:
Government and business leaders don't care because they already have theirs, and don't want to share it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Larnan5 says:
Among the largest problems of retirees is the non existent return on CD's. The FRB has targeting seniors by keeping rates so low. Until CD rates return to a level of 4% or so this problem is unsolvable. Seniors are being forced to speculate in stocks to try an get a decent return. Meanwhile the bailed out banks, who caused this problem, and other companies are prospering on the backs of older people.
reply