Social Security: Trust fund in the red by 2033
The combined Social Security trust funds are expected to be exhausted in 2033, three years earlier than projected in last year's annual report. Medicare's finances have stabilized, but the hospital insurance fund is still projected to run out of money in 2024. The most problematic program is the Social Security disability insurance program, which "faces the most immediate financing shortfall of any of the separate trust funds," according to the trustees. It is forecast to exhaust its trust fund in 2016, two years earlier than projected in last year's report.
The trustees urged Congress to take steps to shore up the programs, noting that projected long-run costs for Medicare and Social Security "are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing, and will require legislative modifications if disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers are to be avoided." Yet few, if any, political observers expect any significant legislative action until after the November election.
When Socal Security's expenditures exceeded the program's non-interest income in 2010 for the first time since 1983, many talked about it "going broke." That's not exactly what would happen. Social Security is a "pay-as-you-go" system. That means that a current worker's Social Security taxes pay a current retiree's monthly benefit.
For a long time, there were more workers than retirees, so a large surplus built up. But as more baby-boomers retire and the number of retirees increase relative to the number of workers paying into the system, the trust funds will be exhausted. Still, all is not lost. Even if the trust fund runs dry, tax income would be sufficient to pay about three-quarters of scheduled benefits for another 50 years or so.
Social Security facts:
-- More than 56 million retirees, disabled workers, spouses, and surviving children of deceased workers receive benefits
-- The program is financed by employers and employees, who each pay a 6.2 percent tax on the first $110,000 of a worker's wages
-- Congress temporarily reduced the worker portion of the tax to 4.2 percent for 2011 and 2012, using borrowed money to make Social Security whole
-- Average monthly benefit: $1,232 for retirees; $1,111 for disabled workers. Benefits are indexed annually for inflation
Medicare facts:
-- About 50 million beneficiaries, including retirees 65 and older and people under 65 with permanent disabilities are covered
-- Medicare is financed by employers and employees, who each pay a 1.45 percent tax on all wages; Medicare beneficiaries also pay monthly premiums for outpatient and prescription coverage
-- Medicare average spending: About $12,500 a year per beneficiary, with the highest-cost 10 percent of beneficiaries accounting for about 60 percent of total spending
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Forbes names most powerful women 2013 10 Photos
- Amy's Baking Company could face legal 'nightmare'
- Student loan defaults rising despite a way out
- Rent the cake? Unusual tips to cut your wedding bill
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- Fed uncertainty extinguishes rally















Even if the government is able to repay what it has borrowed, however, this does not address the true danger. As the government continues to shift money between the two funds, the delineation between Social Security and other programs will become muddled and distort funding priorities. This was not the intention of the creators of Social Security when they made provision for a distinct trust fund and a separate revenue form in the payroll tax.
Should the government wish to continue to ignore the intended autonomy of the Social Security trust fund, it should take this policy stance to its natural end: Social Security revenues and liabilities should be pooled into the general budget (http://******/y5hMvv).
One of those times was the increase in FICA payroll taxes to save Social Security and Medicare.
Now, with 80 million baby boomers retiring over the next 19 years -- 10,000 each and every day -- we need slight tweaks in the payroll tax so that the RED INK doesn't start in 2033 -- 21 years from now!
Fact is, saint ronnie would do it, since he did it in the 1980s, but the republican party full of teabagging extremists are afraid of ALEC and the lobbyist, grover nitwitt, and their idiotic ideology!
I imagine that just raising the $105K cap to $150K or even $200K would suffice to fix SS, since just small tweaks to the system would make it solvent for generations to come!
But, with the obstructionist republicans today, they would rather not, since it's just something else they can wrongly blame on Obama!
The economy is so bad, that of course the government will tell you that you are still young, and to wait until 70 to get a bigger check. When in reality, they are hoping you will not live to see 70.
Oh, I forgot. That makes the most well-off of us having to pay more, even though would get more -- but that won't work, because they won't need social security.
Fix it. Fix it now.. and dont play politics with it.
Social Security as it stands is GOING TO FAIL. We should be planning its controlled end. Period,
My 401K is still not where it was in May 2011. In other words, they (Vanguard) used my money that I had in there AND every penny I contributed AND every penny my company matched for 1 year without paying one single penny. In fact the balance is over $2000.00 LESS than what I had in there May 2011.
At that rate, I will have pretty much NOTHING (after taxes) to retire on.
At least with Social Security, there will be SOMETHING left for me to stop working maybe when (if) I reach 70.
So you want to take that away too?
Problem solved.