July 1, 2009 11:47 AM
- Text
Will Traditional Pensions Make A Comeback?
(MoneyWatch) With workers stressing over their retirement plan balances, more people are calling for a return to some form of traditional employer sponsored pension or lifetime income guarantee. Let me break this to you gently: it's not going to happen. While policy wonks and commentators may debate it, the vast majority of employers have no stomach for it. You need to accept that your retirement is your responsibility, and plan accordingly.
Short History of Success. Contrary to popular opinion, employer based pension plans had a very short history of success. They ran well from about the mid 1940s through about the mid 1970s, and then big cracks started to develop in the system. Basically, many employers over-promised and underfunded these plans. Once they figured out how much it would cost to guarantee a worker's pay for 20 or 30 years in retirement, they began to back away from the benefits. And the trend has continued ever since.
Strange Beginning. In fact, employer pensions took off in large part as a result of wage freezes instituted during World War II. The costs of fringe benefits were exempt from the wage freeze provisions, so employers upped wages by promising to fund worker retirement plans. But the plans distorted the calculation of total wages paid to employees, which of course was their original intent. This distortion came back to haunt employers when times got tight.
Multiple Employers. Moreover, in today's globally competitive and rapidly changing markets, traditional pensions aren't generally helpful to many workers. If you're like the average employee, you'll have between five and 10 employers throughout your working career. Pension benefits are skewed to those who work for one employer over a long period of time. Thus, if you have multiple employers over the years, you'll find that you basically didn't accrue many benefits from any employer.
Short History of Success. Contrary to popular opinion, employer based pension plans had a very short history of success. They ran well from about the mid 1940s through about the mid 1970s, and then big cracks started to develop in the system. Basically, many employers over-promised and underfunded these plans. Once they figured out how much it would cost to guarantee a worker's pay for 20 or 30 years in retirement, they began to back away from the benefits. And the trend has continued ever since.
Strange Beginning. In fact, employer pensions took off in large part as a result of wage freezes instituted during World War II. The costs of fringe benefits were exempt from the wage freeze provisions, so employers upped wages by promising to fund worker retirement plans. But the plans distorted the calculation of total wages paid to employees, which of course was their original intent. This distortion came back to haunt employers when times got tight.
- As pension costs rose, employers had to continue to pump more money into the plans, yet the employees had no idea how much it costs. So in the employees' minds, they weren't getting raises, but in the employer's mind, they were. This tension with employee benefits has existed ever since.
- When you think about it, there's no business reason why your employer should agree to fund your retirement any more than they should agree to pay your mortgage.
Multiple Employers. Moreover, in today's globally competitive and rapidly changing markets, traditional pensions aren't generally helpful to many workers. If you're like the average employee, you'll have between five and 10 employers throughout your working career. Pension benefits are skewed to those who work for one employer over a long period of time. Thus, if you have multiple employers over the years, you'll find that you basically didn't accrue many benefits from any employer.
- If you're changing jobs frequently, a better deal is to get a 401(k) match or profit sharing contribution that you own and control right off the bat. That way, you have a clear sense of what you're being paid, and you know what you can take with you when you leave for greener pastures.
- There's no easy answer to the retirement challenge. Global competition requires workplace flexibly for both employers and employees. Otherwise, you won't be in business or have a job for very long. So as tough as it is, the 401(k), IRA and every other form of individual investment account are your best tools for building long term financial independence.
- The real problem with retirement planning is that people save too little and take too much risk with what they have saved. I'll talk about that in future posts.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Pebble Beach: Johnson in 3-way tie; Tiger strong
- New Mom Fear
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- Afghan private security handover looking messy
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






