June 24, 2009 3:34 PM
- Text
A Long Life Is Expensive
(MoneyWatch)
In 1900, life expectancy in the United States was 49. No wonder people didn't do much retirement planning back then. Today, it's almost 78, and it's projected to steadily increase over the next 50 years.
What these life expectancy numbers mean is that if you want to retire at 65, you need to plan on at least a 20 to 30 year period of supporting yourself from the return on your investments. That's expensive, and you'll likely need to take some financial risks to do it.
Many people misinterpret the life expectancy numbers. They see 78 and think, "well, I've only got to plan on 10 to 15 years." But 78 is the life expectancy of someone on the date of their birth. For each year you live, you actually have a longer life expectancy.
So if you reach 65, your life expectancy is about 19 years, or out to age 84, according to the Center for Disease Control statistics. This basically means you have a 50/50 chance of living 19 years or more.
And if you make it to 75, then your life expectancy is another 12 years, or out to age 87. At that point, there's a 50/50 chance you'll live beyond 87.
And if you're married, your joint life expectancy is even higher. Moreover, if you have some financial resources and have been taking care of yourself, your odds go up again. When you put it all together, you've go to be thinking of a range of 20 to 30 years for your retirement money.
With that sort of time frame, you'll need your money to grow even when you retire. Here's a little illustration:
Bottom line. From a financial standpoint, dying young isn't a problem. It's living a long life that's the challenge. One thing you don't want to do is underestimate how long you might live and how much you might need.
Photo from Flickr, courtesy of mcohen.chromiste, CC 2.0
In 1900, life expectancy in the United States was 49. No wonder people didn't do much retirement planning back then. Today, it's almost 78, and it's projected to steadily increase over the next 50 years.What these life expectancy numbers mean is that if you want to retire at 65, you need to plan on at least a 20 to 30 year period of supporting yourself from the return on your investments. That's expensive, and you'll likely need to take some financial risks to do it.
Many people misinterpret the life expectancy numbers. They see 78 and think, "well, I've only got to plan on 10 to 15 years." But 78 is the life expectancy of someone on the date of their birth. For each year you live, you actually have a longer life expectancy.
So if you reach 65, your life expectancy is about 19 years, or out to age 84, according to the Center for Disease Control statistics. This basically means you have a 50/50 chance of living 19 years or more.
And if you make it to 75, then your life expectancy is another 12 years, or out to age 87. At that point, there's a 50/50 chance you'll live beyond 87.
And if you're married, your joint life expectancy is even higher. Moreover, if you have some financial resources and have been taking care of yourself, your odds go up again. When you put it all together, you've go to be thinking of a range of 20 to 30 years for your retirement money.
With that sort of time frame, you'll need your money to grow even when you retire. Here's a little illustration:
- When you retire, a conservative estimate of how much you can distribute from your investment holdings is 4 percent per year, adjusted for inflation going forward. That means if you have $1,000,000, you would take out $40,000 the first year. If inflation is 3 percent next year, you take out $41,200, and so on each year.
- If you did this for 30 years, your distribution would grow from $40,000 to about $94,000. And your total distributions over those 30 years would be about $1,900,000, or almost twice what you started with.
Bottom line. From a financial standpoint, dying young isn't a problem. It's living a long life that's the challenge. One thing you don't want to do is underestimate how long you might live and how much you might need.
Photo from Flickr, courtesy of mcohen.chromiste, CC 2.0
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Lin scores 38 to lead Knicks over Lakers 92-85
- Mavericks hold off T-wolves 104-97 behind Nowitzki
- Crawford leads Trail Blazers past Hornets, 94-86
- Jennings' 24 lifts Bucks past Cavs 113-112 in OT
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






