By

Lynn O'Shaughnessy /

MoneyWatch/ November 27, 2012, 8:33 AM

Do colleges exploit their professors?

(MoneyWatch) While teenagers and parents who visit college campuses understandably ask many of the same questions, there is one that schools never get asked: How well are you treating your professors?

It's an excellent question because in fact many college teacher are treated shabbily. Some make such paltry salaries that they qualify for food stamps. The Des Moines Register recently examined pay of state employees and discovered that adjunct professors represented two of the five lowest paid jobs in Iowa. The other lowest-paid occupations were laborers, parking lot attendants and food workers.

Unlike full-time staff professors, many adjunct professors are part-timers and typically do not enjoy job security or workplace benefits. Their job situation is starkly different than tenured professors, who enjoy lifetime job security, health care, pensions and often light teaching loads with plenty of time for research. 

The number of adjunct professors in the U.S. has been climbing. Today roughly 70 percent of college professors are not "tenure track." Their presence is more common at regional state schools and at mid-tier private universities. (You can learn more about their plight at the website of New Faculty Majority, which aims to improve conditions for these professors.)

Why should students care if a highly educated teacher is working for peanuts? The grim working conditions can impact the quality of education that students receive. For instance, adjuncts often lack offices where they can meet with students, and they may be difficult to see outside of class because many often also teach at a different campus or school.

Adjuncts also can be tempted to make classes easier because poor student evaluations can jeopardize their chances of getting another teaching contract. These vulnerable teachers may also censor themselves in class for fear of saying anything that might offend students. This can limit students' chances of engaging in meaningful discussions.

Students should look for schools that do a better job of hiring professors who are on the tenure track. You can find the breakdown of tenure-tenure track versus adjunct professors at any institution by using an extremely helpful search tool at the Modern Language Association.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
7 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
phaeder2657 says:
Whoa. CBS, the bastion of up-to-date news, gets this on NOW? Come on. The story of exploitation of part-time faculty, full-time contingents, graduate students, and others teaching in more than 1800 colleges and universities has been repeated in the mainstream and not so mainstream press for YEARS. Google it -- "exploitation of adjunct faculty" or "unionizing adjunct faculty" or "the new faculty majority." This at-will perma-temp paradigm is a model that is not just hitched to faculty teaching the majority of classes at most colleges. It's the new normal, having people patch together jobs here and there to make ends meets, barely. Nickle and Dimed is a title of a book and the ethos of our One Percent hyper rich.

Nothing about the corporatization of EVERYTHING, including community colleges, where deans and VPs and presidents and others in ADMIN muddy the waters and soil the air? Not reportable? In a time of fear of companies, fear of taxing corporations for their endless farm teams -- the schools that teach their workers, who train their consumers/customers -- and fear of education and more of it, well, what can we expect.

What a scam, really, encouraging people to get PhDs, to go into education, then to ensure that there is this multi-tiered system, an apartheid of sorts, where they learn the lessons of what it is to be part of the lower rung of the 99 Percent.

Life might be hard teaching as a freeway flyer, but the reality is that without a single payer health care system, we are screwed -- the American worker, that is. Without forcing a new discussion on hone ownership or affordable rental housing, and making renting the new norm, then we are screwed. If we can't create viable and elegant public transportation systems, then, yes, the lower portion of the 99 percent -- the majority -- are screwed.

You want 50 or 60 percent of the faculty teaching as temps who are looking for a full-time job to continue helping the deanlets and higher admin folk make their retirement goals on the backs of faculty? Then support public infrastructure, support medical care for people teaching students how to think, how to think for themselves, and how to be the leaders and workers of this country.

Dog-eat-dog is what these One Percenters and their 19 percenter minions are hoping for while the majority -- 80 percent -- scramble to find a drop out from veterinarian school in debt to the tune of $100 K to repair that torn hernia from carrying around six bags of books and essays from their six various campus workplaces.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Antiutopia says:
Real problem being described here... by the most ignorant possible problem. Tenured professors do not have it easy. They do not have light teaching loads -- if you think so, then you don't know what it takes to supervise a master's or doctoral student. They also have committee responsibilities, research responsibilities (both for their teaching, thesis supervision, and publications), responsibilities to their professional organizations, student advising responsibilities, etc. An adjunct professor teaching seven classes at four different institutions is not working harder than a tenure track professor, who are also treated shabbily -- in the form of piling on work with no additional compensation. The average tenure or tenure track professor probably works 60 hours or more a week, and does in fact work all summer in many cases even if they're not teaching.
reply
Kallipolis replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Give me a break. Do you really think someone teaching seven classes at four different universities, commuting back and forth twice a day, without an office, health insurance, and pay below minimum wage, is on the same level as a tenured or tenure-track professor? You are kidding yourself.

Tenured professors, if they are lucky, "supervise" one or two doctoral theses a year. At mid-level schools -- let's face it -- these dissertations are of mediocre quality and there's only so much that can be done with them. State U isn't going to produce the next Saul Kripke. Tenure-track profs also have the leeway to say "no" to graduate students who propose to work with them. Advising undergraduates? How much time does that take? Once a semester, for two weeks, you have a parade of kids into your office whom you barely know -- all it takes is a minimal grasp of university requirements and your signature to sign off on their registration forms. And in my program, most of the tenured folks published one or two books, tops, after attaining that holy grail. Most don't keep up with the literature in their field after they turn 50 or 55, teach the same classes year after year, have research assistants to do their library and photocopying work -- all they have to do is think. (Which is what adjuncts are expected to do, too, by the way.)

All of that aside, the whole point is compensation. The tenure-track professor sits in one office, all day, working, with every amenity available to him or her. This is comparable to every other job in America -- yeah, you put in eight or nine hours of work, you read, you teach three classes, and you write. For that, you earn anywhere from 50K to 70K. It's not a bad living. You're not digging ditches or driving an 18-wheeler for days on end. It's a cushy life, I'm sorry. You won't get any sympathy from manual laborers, people in retail, or most of the American population. Tenured-track profs -- and tenured ones -- have essentially won the lottery.

The adjunct has none of that. It's a miserable existence, and they work just as long, and as hard, as a TT professor. The difference is that they're paid 40K less (or even more) with no guarantee of future employment, and are treated like domestic help in the 1700s by the regular faculty and administration (and even secretaries)...after putting in just the same amount of effort toward their doctorate as anyone else.

If you'd like to trade positions, let me know. I have a doctorate, two master's, and would love to have the chance to take on all of the responsibilities you mention.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mattwilliamsconsulting says:
The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio is among the worst abusers of adjunct labor in the country. 60% of UA's faculty are part-time, while less than 2.5% of UA's $400+ million annual budget is spent compensating part-time faculty. UA's president and 35 or so vice presidents earn in excess of 50% in cash compensation alone of what the more than 1,000 part-time faculty earn as a group.

Don't be fooled by the economic argument. Colleges and universities have simply become addicted to cheap, contingent labor, and the resources that could be used to support classroom instruction are being spent on other things such as the half billion in campus improvements completed at UA over the past 14 years. Just for good measure, though, they've embarked on another half billion dollar campaign to further improve the campus.

What impact is this having on the quality of education? UA boasts of a 6-year graduation rate of around 30%, and the African American male graduation rate is only about 10%. It verges on the criminal.

Unfortunately, part-time faculty are specifically excluded from the definition of state employees for public collective bargaining purposes in Ohio, so they can't even collective bargain for better working conditions. If there are any lawyers out there, we need help fighting the law so that part-time faculty can re-balance the equation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mattwilliamsconsulting says:
The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio is among the worst abusers of adjunct labor in the country. 60% of UA's faculty are part-time, while less than 2.5% of UA's $400+ million annual budget is spent compensating part-time faculty. UA's president and 35 or so vice presidents earn in excess of 50% in cash compensation alone of what the more than 1,000 part-time faculty earn as a group.

Don't be fooled by the economic argument. Colleges and universities have simply become addicted to cheap, contingent labor, and the resources that could be used to support classroom instruction are being spent on other things such as the half billion in campus improvements completed at UA over the past 14 years. Just for good measure, though, they've embarked on another half billion dollar campaign to further improve the campus.

What impact is this having on the quality of education? UA boasts of a 6-year graduation rate of around 30%, and the African American male graduation rate is only about 10%. It verges on the criminal.

Unfortunately, part-time faculty are specifically excluded from the definition of state employees for public collective bargaining purposes in Ohio, so they can't even collective bargain for better working conditions. If there are any lawyers out there, we need help fighting the law so that part-time faculty can re-balance the equation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kmburke463 says:
MJVWSR's job is what adjunct positions should be. Most of us, however, do not have such good fortune. I am an adjunct in Ohio, where the university I work for relies on cheap labor in order to survive. Here, 50% of the faculty are adjunct, and at many universities that percentage is much higher. My position comes with no benefits (thank goodness I can rely on my husband's job for health coverage), no guarantee of work from one semester to the next, an office (former closet) that I share with four others with no computer, and no representation or right to organize. Without adjuncts, the university would not be able to admit so many students (who would teach them?), whose tuition, loans, and fees keep the school afloat (barely). The so-called "adjunct problem" is a national epidemic. It's unsustainable, and a solution must be found.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mjvwsr says:
I serve as an adjunct professor at a local university. I teach one class a term, three terms a year. It is strictly a part time job that helps me keep engaged and learning. And besides, it pays for my golf membership and my wife doesn't miss the money:)
reply