CBS/AP/ August 22, 2012, 3:09 PM

Middle-class share of America's income shrinks

(CBS/AP) WASHINGTON - The middle class is receiving less of America's total income, declining to its smallest share in decades as median wages stagnate in the economic doldrums and wealth concentrates at the top.

A study released Wednesday by the Pew Research Center highlights diminished hopes, too, for the roughly 50 percent of adults defined as middle class, with household incomes ranging from $39,000 to $118,000. The report describes this mid-tier group as suffering its "worst decade in modern history," having fallen backward in income for the first time since the end of World War II.

"As the 2012 presidential candidates prepare their closing arguments to America's middle class, they are courting a group that has endured a lost decade for economic well-being," Pew said in its report. "Since 2000, the middle class has shrunk in size, fallen backward in income and wealth, and shed some -- but by no means all -- of its characteristic faith in the future."

Three years after the recession technically ended, middle class Americans are still feeling the economic pinch, with most saying they have been forced to reduce spending in the past year. And fewer now believe that hard work will allow them to get ahead in life. Families are now more likely to say their children's economic future will be the same or worse than their own.

Jobs program for people trapped in unemployment
U.S. poverty on track to rise to highest level since 1960s
U.S. incomes rise, but spending lull hurts economy

In all, 85 percent of middle class Americans say it is more difficult now than a decade ago to maintain their standard of living. Some 62 percent say a lot of the blame lies with Congress. A slight majority say a lot lies with banks and other financial institutions. Just 8 percent blame the middle class itself.

"The job market is changing, our living standards are falling in the middle, and middle-income parents are now afraid that their children will be worse off than they are," says Timothy Smeeding, a University of Wisconsin-Madison economics professor who specializes in income inequality.

He said that many middle-income families have taken a big hit in the past decade as health care costs increase, mid-wage jobs disappear due to automation and outsourcing and college tuition mounts for those seeking to build credentials to get better work. In the meantime, more-affluent families have fared better in net worth because they are less dependent than lower-income groups on home property values, which remain shriveled after the housing bust. Wealthier Americans are more likely to be invested in the stock market, which as a whole has been quicker to recover from the downturn.

"These are the disaffected middle class who work hard and play by the rules of society, but increasingly see their situation declining by forces beyond their control," Smeeding said in an interview. "No matter who is president, the climb back up for the middle class and the recovery will be slow and often painful."

The Pew study is just the latest indicator of a long-term trend of widening U.S. income inequality. The Census Bureau reported last year that income fell for the wealthiest down 1.2 percent to $180,810 for the top 5 percent of households. But the bottom fifth of households those making $20,000 or less saw incomes decline 4 percent.

The new study reviewed 2010 data from the Census Bureau and Federal Reserve, defining "middle class" as the tier of adults whose household income falls between two-thirds and double the national median income, or $39,418 to $118,255 in 2010 for a family of three. By this definition, "middle class" makes up about 51 percent of U.S. adults, down from 61 percent in 1971.

In 1970, the share of U.S. income that went to the middle class was 62 percent, while wealthier Americans received just 29 percent. But by 2010, the middle class garnered 45 percent of the nation's income, tying a low first reached in 2006, compared to 46 percent for upper-income Americans.

Pew Research Center
Since 2000, the median income for America's middle class has fallen from $72,956 to $69,487.

"The notion that the middle class always enjoys a rising standard of living is a big part of America's sense of itself. And in modern times, it's always been true until now," said Paul Taylor, executive vice president of the Pew Research Center.

"Middle class Americans still have faith in the future their own, their children's, the country's. But their outlook is not as rosy now as it was before the recession began," he added.

Among the findings:

Who's to blame: Of the self-described middle-class Americans who say it is more difficult now than it was a decade ago to maintain a standard of living, 62 percent say "a lot" of the blame lies with Congress. About 54 percent say the same about banks and financial institutions, while 47 percent say large corporations, 44 percent point to the Bush administration, 39 percent cite foreign competition and 34 percent find fault with the Obama administration. About 8 percent say the middle class itself deserves a lot of the blame.

Feeling pinched: About 62 percent of middle-class Americans say they were forced to reduce household spending in the past year, compared to 53 percent who said so in 2008. Separately, roughly 42 percent of middle-class adults say their household's financial situation is worse now than before the recession began, compared to 32 percent who reported they are now better off and 23 percent who said their finances are unchanged. Of those who said they were worse off now, about 51 percent said it will take at least five years to recover, including 8 percent who said they will never recover.

Diminished hopes: About 63 percent of the general public including 67 percent of the middle class agree that most people who want to get ahead can make it if they're willing to work hard, down from 74 percent of the public who believed so in 1999. As for their children's future, 43 percent in the middle class say their children's standard of living will be better than their own, compared to 47 percent who say it will be worse (26 percent) or the same (21 percent). In 2008, 51 percent said their children's future would be better, compared to 19 percent who said worse and 21 percent who said it would be the same.

Picking a president: About 52 percent of self-described middle-class adults say President Barack Obama's policies in a second term would help the middle class, while 39 percent say they would not help. In contrast, about 42 percent say that electing Republican challenger Mitt Romney would help the middle class, while 40 percent said it would not help. People who identify as middle class are more likely to lean Democratic (50 percent) than Republican (39 percent).

Declining wealth: Median net worth for the middle class fell 28 percent over the last decade, from $129,000 in 2001 to $93,000, wiping out two decades of gains. Among upper-income families, net worth edged higher from $569,000 to $574,000. Lower-income families saw net worth fall 45 percent to $10,000.

The Pew survey involved telephone interviews with 2,508 adults, including 1,287 people who identified themselves as middle class, conducted from July 16 to 26. The margin of error was 2.8 percentage points for the total sample, 3.9 percentage points for those in the middle class.

AP Deputy Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
71 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nfission says:
The real truth is that none of us can vote our way out of this mess. We actually have no power, just the illusion of power.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
inbethlehem says:
The GOP loves to tout discussion of tax fairness as "class warfare." Well, looking at tht chart, we can tell who's winning that battle.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Outspoken-1 says:
It's simple, during the Bush administration we got fleeced. You dumb azzes voted him in*, even after his father got a whole nation hooked on coke. (That was fine too with a lot of you because they dumped it off in those other peoples neighborhoods, right, but the collateral damage from that was a bit**, huh?) Face it, a lot of you got suckered, and a lot of you still got your hand in the air asking for more. Everyone talks about conspiracy theorists, but didn't what they say was going to happen, happen (the world's on the verge of bankruptcy, unbelievable)? When are we going to see and realize that there is a group of people out there that simply doesn't give a damn about the rest of us (the outsourcers, the crony capitalists, the climate change naysayers threatning our scientist, et al) and, through their duplicity, loves tricking whoever they can into thinking that they do, even getting them to help. Go on, vote them in. It'll trickle down one these days, right? (I'll tell you what's trickling down.) Wha, blame it on the Ambien. A lot of you are worried about our eniemies out there: worry more, they're in the room with us.

*(I may have to grant amnesty, I forgot about the Florida fiasco).
reply
Outspoken-1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I kind of point a finger, but actually we may be screwed from both sides. Our current financial woes started with the push for globalization, as it is a manisfestation of globalization, which was already in the pipeline when Clinton came into office, and that was the beginning of the end. Actually, the assassination of Kennedy was probably the beginning of the end.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
David_Tampa says:
Simple answer but NO one wants to talk about it. ALL of the economists know the answer. Reinstate the 77 tax bracket on the 3rd million of income that Ronald Reagan hated and got rid of. The slide to the top will stop, the rich will still be rich and the middle class will recover. End of story.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
get_down says:
Timothy Smeeding (a University of Wisconsin-Madison economics professor who specializes in income inequality) said in an interview, "No matter who is president, the climb back up for the middle class and the recovery will be slow and often painful." Hummm, that genius Federal Reserve Chairman Mr. Ben Bernanke who kept the key interest rate close to zero since 2008 and he's even stubborn enough to pledge that he'll keep that low interest rate to at least 2014 no matter what! My saving account with a balance of 12K earned me 1 dollar for the month of May, 99 cents for the month of June and 1.02 for the month of July - i.e. $3.01 interest for 3 whole months. I voted for Mr. Obama when his campaign slogan was "Change and Hope" and YET he awarded Second term of the FRC to Mr. Ben Bernanke who's truly clueless and incompetent to say the least. Coming November, I think I'll vote for someone else for "Change and Hope" NOT "Moving Forward" which would be HOPELESS!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Calvinius says:
He's wealthy because his father was wealthy, Rocky.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MickKegeon says:
Obamanomics and "trickle up poverty" is overtaking the middle class.
reply
retmw1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Seems the trickle down effect that we've had for over 10 years hasn't worked. Where's all the jobs from the taxbreaks for corporations and the rich, that the republicans promised?
Calvinius replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This is 30 years of trickle-down failing, dimwit.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
Just keep supporting those republicans and pretty soon the entire middle-class species will just up and disappear.
reply
retmw1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's the gop game plan.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
raymailhot says:
And as we push business out of America what would you expect? When you conduct a Bolshevik style war on the economy, what does the historical data show on this subject?
reply
retmw1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The only ones pushing business out of America is the American consumer and the greed of corporations.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Repubs_R_Fiscal_Liberals says:
by ROCKYI941 August 22, 2012 7:14 PM EDT
slam the door on CHINA....

------------

Quit shopping at WalMart then, Einstein.
reply
retmw1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly RRFL.
See all 71 Comments