By

Jerry Edgerton /

MoneyWatch/ May 15, 2012, 7:00 AM

Made in USA: 4 new cars roll out of U.S. factories

Dodge Dart

Dodge Dart / Chrysler Group

(MoneyWatch) When the first, and revived, Dodge Dart rolled off the assembly line in Belvidere, Ill., last week, it joined three other new or redesigned models from Detroit companies being assembled in the U.S. rather than abroad. The Chevrolet Sonic, Buick Verano, and Ford Focus all are being produced in reopened, renovated U.S. plants.

Companies have been able to bring production back to the U.S. because of an agreement negotiated with the United Auto Workers during the 2009 bailout and bankruptcies of General Motors (GM) and Chrysler. Under that contract, 40 percent of hourly workers -- mostly new hires -- earn about half the previous UAW wage. The contract also applies to Ford, which was not involved in the bailout.

Previously, automakers avoided manufacturing their compact and subcompact cars, such as the models above, because of the vehicles' slim profit margins.

5 used cars NOT to buy
Test driving the Ford Focus Electric
Traffic deaths fall as new technology spreads

Here is a closer look at the four new models:

  • Dodge Dart: As part of the Fiat takeover of Chrysler Group during bailout negotiations, the company agreed to build a small, high-MPG model in the U.S. Reopening the Belvidere plant in northwestern Illinois created 1,800 jobs. The Dart is a revival of a Dodge nameplate from the 1960s and 1970s. But the Dart's design is based on the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, much praised in Europe for its road manners and sprightly handling. (Fiat also owns Alfa Romeo.)

    On sale next month, the compact Dart will start at $15,995 for its base model. It comes with three engine choices:  2.0-liter and 2.4-liter four-cylinder options and a 1.4-liter turbocharged four. The turbo version has an EPA rating of 27 MPG in city driving and 39 on the highway. As a compact, it will compete against the Chevrolet Cruze, Ford Focus, Honda Civic, among other highly rated vcars.

  • Ford Focus: The Ford Focus Electric, going on sale this month, as well as the gasoline versions of the Focus comes from Ford's renovated, flexible plant in Wayne, Mich. Ford says this flexibility keeps down costs because it can produce only as many of the expensive electrics, which run $39,500 before a $7,500 federal tax credit, as it can sell.

    The gasoline-powered Focus, which went on sale last year as a 2012 model, won praise from reviewers for its pleasing styling and crisp handling. Like some competitors, the Focus also offers comfort and technology features not previously available in small cars. Its 2.0-liter, four-cylinder engine is rated at 26 MPG in city driving, 36 on the highway. List price ranges from $16,500 for the base model up to $22,700.

  • Chevrolet Sonic: GM boasts that the Sonic is the only subcompact manufactured in the U.S. The Sonic is being built at the 1,750-employee Orion Township plant outside Detroit. Reviewers have praised the Sonic as a major upgrade in looks, performance, and comfort from the Aveo model it replaces. Available with the same choice of 1.4-liter and 1.8-liter four-cylinder engines as the bigger Chevrolet Cruze, the Sonic ranges in list price from $13,865 for the base model to $18,625.

  • Buick Verano: This Buick compact is built at the same Orion Township plant as the Chevy Sonic. Producing a small car is part of Buick's shift away from being perceived chiefly as a maker of land yachts for elderly buyers. Reviewers say the Verano works for shoppers looking for a small car with decent power and a comfortable, upscale interior. With a 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, the Verano is rated at 21 MPG in city driving, 32 highway. List price ranges from $22,585 to $26,809.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
  • Jerry Edgerton On Twitter »

    View all articles by Jerry Edgerton on CBS MoneyWatch »
    Jerry Edgerton, author of Car Shopping Made Easy, has been covering the car beat since Detroit companies dominated the U.S. market. The former car columnist for Money magazine and Washington correspondent for Business Week, Edgerton specializes in finding the best deals on wheels and offering advice on making your car last.

10 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agustus21 says:
I think the Verano is a huge mistake. If you look at gas mileage alone it hasn't improved. The 1992-2005 Lesabre had a 3.8L 3800 engine that got 23-29 mpg and lasted 300k miles. The advantage was that this engine was smooth as silk, perfectly harmonized, and lasted forever. What is the advantage to moving to a slightly smaller engine that gets NO better gas mileage! This is an example of government making things worse and not better. I hope consumers pass on the Verano.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tramky says:
Small cars have their place, but in the end they are largely impractical vehicles. If you want to have ONE vehicle to handle life as it is actually lived by real people, a tiny car is NOT going to work. I wanted ONE vehicle that will work for me, so a medium-size SUV was the obvious choice, with suitable amenities, reliability and room to carry larger stuff, something I do with frequency. With just a small car, the latter would be impossible--I'd be borrowing or renting trucks or vans from friends or whoever else I might dredge up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rharrin1 says:
American made????? the transmission and motor for Ford are made in FRANCE and SPAIN how is that for American made?
reply
MrBoomshadow replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No car is made completely in any one nation. None. Zero.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rickenaz says:
Seems like 32 mpg is fine especially at the price of the new cars. Subaru will end up costing more. Couple that with importing the vehicles and it's tough to beat out a well made American car. You also have to factor in the horse power the car is producing before getting too worked up over pure mpg.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
enlightenu says:
32 mpg is not good for a new compact. I get 33mpg in my all wheel drive automatic 2005 Subaru Legacy. I would rather be in my big safe sedan.
reply
P0ST1NG_AWAY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That is the RATED mpg.
What REAL people, driving carefully, is better.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wolfmagic2012 says:
32 mpg... Pure crap. Go electric or go broke.
reply
jseymouriii replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
european turbo diesel is best.
MrBoomshadow replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not economically speaking. Given the $39,500 retail price of an electric vehicle like the Ford Focus Electric versus the price of the gas-powered focus at $22,700, we have a difference off the lot (minus tax, tag, and title, but including the $7,500 tax credit for EVs) of $16,800. Currently regular unleaded gas (87 Octane) retails for an average of $3.73 per gallon, though that price is, of course, subject to change.

Assuming you drive your car on a mix of city roads and highways, you get an average of 31 if you drive the way the EPA testers do. (I realize there are variables here. Short of changing reality, there's little I could do, and if I could change reality, I'd make it so John Lennon never got shot.)

Assuming also that you drive the typical national average of 15,000 miles per year, that means you need 483.87 gallons to make it through each year. Multiply that by the current national average of 3.73, and you are spending $1,804 on go-juice.

Sounds like a lot, but that $16,800 price difference between the gas and electric Foci means that you'll have to drive the electric Focus for 9 years, 3 months, and 23 days just to break even.

Obviously, this assumes gas prices don't go up, but it also assumes neither vehicle suffers any mechanical failures or wrecks...it assumes a lot. Economically speaking, unless you know for a fact that you will definitely keep the same vehicle rolling for 9 years and 113 days, the law of diminishing returns strongly suggests holding off on an electric vehicle if you're just buying for economy.

Now, if you're buying for environmental reasons, I'm with you, because it's usually easier to lobby for cleaner power plants than cleaning cars up any further. We're reaching the limits on cleaning up internal combustion engines. If we can replace coal-fired power plants with more solar, wind, nuclear (there, I said it), hydroelectric, and other sources, electrics become even better environmentally than they are now.