HUD: Bank of America violated Fair Housing Act

CBS/AP
The trouble continues for Bank of America (BAC). According to a press release issued Monday, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) alleges the bank is guilty of discriminating against borrowers with disabilities.
This is just one in a string of allegations against B of A, one of the nation's largest banks.
HUD claims Bank of America "imposed unnecessary and burdensome requirements on borrowers who relied on disability income to qualify for their home loans and required some disabled borrowers to provide physician statements to qualify for home mortgage loans."
New York foreclosure lawsuit names Bank of America
According to the report, Bank of America allegedly asked borrowers to provide proof of their disabilities and the continuation of their Social Security income before approving loans, after first denying them. If the allegations are true, B of A violated the Fair Housing Act.
"Holding homebuyers with disabilities to a higher standard just because they rely on disability payments as a source of income is against the law," John Trasvia, HUD assistant secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, said in the press release. "Mortgage companies may verify income and have eligibility standards but they may not single out home buyers with disabilities to delay or deny financing when they are otherwise eligible."
According to Reuters, Bank of America said "there is no basis to allege that Bank of America has engaged in a systemic practice of discriminating on the basis of disability in connection with mortgage lending."
Foreclosure pact: Enough help for homeowners?
Consumers paying off debt helps economic recovery
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or handicap. This includes imposing different application or qualification criteria based on disability. Fair Housing also makes it illegal to inquire about the nature or severity of a disability except in limited circumstances which, according to HUD, are not applicable in this case.
The allegations are based on a secretary-initiated investigation of complaints filed by two borrowers in Michigan and one borrower in Wisconsin.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Seeking solutions to the student aid mess
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- How to stop the mediocrity pandemic
- LinkedIn: 3 tips for building a better profile
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- Kellogg re-inventing Special K brand
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Yahoo buys blogging site Tumblr for $1.1 billion













If the financial requirements you set as a landlord, property manager, home-owner, or mortgage lender have been met, than that person can rent or own.
If Bank of America decides they want to require more medical documents of some applicants, then a new policy must go in place requiring medical documents from every single applicant (See? Treat everyone THE SAME.) Can you imagine them asking for an up-to-date physical before approving a home loan? It's irrelevant information, and you would wonder why they need it! It is just as irrelevant to a person whom is disabled. Disability is a protected class under Fair Housing just as Color, Race, Religion, National Origin, Familial Status, and Sex are protected. I think we would all be horrified if Bank of America required Jews to go through more hoops to qualify for a loan than White Americans. This is the same situation. Treating someone with disabilities differently than someone without is just wrong.
The housing business is a gamble, yes. If you choose to participate in the business, than your qualifying criteria should be the same across the board for every single person interested in the property or loan.
Mortgage lenders, like landlords, require that you be able to make the monthly payment multiplied by a certain number (ex. 3x the monthly rent or 3x the monthly payment). In my neighborhood, a foreclosed home just sold for $36,000--over a 20 year mortgage with decent credit your payment could be as low as $370 a month. Therefore, if the lender requires 2.5 x $370 per month then someone with $1000 monthly income could be approved. Source of income is protected in most states, too. From where the income arises is irrelevant as long as it's legal and hits the right number.