January 26, 2010 3:56 AM
- Text
Royal Caribbean's Stops in Haiti Aren't "Immoral"
(MoneyWatch) I have been hearing a few accounts from people who are appalled by Caribbean cruises, namely Royal Caribbean International for continuing to stop in Labadee, Haiti. While some people think cruisers should not venture off the ship and appear to enjoy Haiti's beaches while thousands of people are homeless and hungry, others advocate spending money in a country that desperately needs it.
Royal Caribbean spent $50 million developing Labadee, a beach resort about 60 miles from Haiti's capital. The cruise operator is one of Haiti's largest foreign investors, working with the government for more than three decades. Still, the Associated Press boils it all down to a question of morality:
While news accounts disparage luxury liners only 100 miles from devastation I found myself annoyed at the portrayal of Royal Caribbean. Being a journalist myself, I saw it as irresponsible journalism to write stories as if cruisers were modern-day Marie Antoinettes and tourism equated to colonialism. Royal Caribbean's cruises are hardly exclusive and neither are their passengers all wealthy. A five-day cruise from Miami on the Navigator of the Seas -- with a stop at Labadee -- starts at $349 per person.
As a rule, I don't write about charitable donations, but I will make an exception in this case. Royal Caribbean, aside from developing and investing in Haiti, said it would donate at least $1 million in humanitarian aid and contribute all the company's net revenue from Labadee to the relief effort. Its cruise ships are also delivering supplies to Haiti.
Royal Caribbean has an interest in Haiti, so donating millions of dollars or being a cargo service to the island country is also beneficial for the company. I don't consider that moral or immoral, it's just the way things are. However, the idea that guilt has so paralyzed some people that they must berate others for spending tourist dollars in Haiti is unconscionable.
Staying away from Haiti and taking away what little economic stability tourism brought to the nation isn't the answer. A person can enjoy its beaches and beauty and still donate time and money to its people. There is no moral dilemma here except in some people's small minds.
Royal Caribbean spent $50 million developing Labadee, a beach resort about 60 miles from Haiti's capital. The cruise operator is one of Haiti's largest foreign investors, working with the government for more than three decades. Still, the Associated Press boils it all down to a question of morality:
Should vacationers relax and have fun with so much suffering elsewhere on the island? Or would it be worse to halt the port calls and deprive locals of what they earn from tourism?I think it was a local who really summed up the situation eloquently. Jameson Charitable, a 20-year-old guide who offers tours of the island, makes $15 every port of call. "Without this," Charitable told the Associated Press, motioning to the cruise ship, "we don't eat."
While news accounts disparage luxury liners only 100 miles from devastation I found myself annoyed at the portrayal of Royal Caribbean. Being a journalist myself, I saw it as irresponsible journalism to write stories as if cruisers were modern-day Marie Antoinettes and tourism equated to colonialism. Royal Caribbean's cruises are hardly exclusive and neither are their passengers all wealthy. A five-day cruise from Miami on the Navigator of the Seas -- with a stop at Labadee -- starts at $349 per person.
As a rule, I don't write about charitable donations, but I will make an exception in this case. Royal Caribbean, aside from developing and investing in Haiti, said it would donate at least $1 million in humanitarian aid and contribute all the company's net revenue from Labadee to the relief effort. Its cruise ships are also delivering supplies to Haiti.
Royal Caribbean has an interest in Haiti, so donating millions of dollars or being a cargo service to the island country is also beneficial for the company. I don't consider that moral or immoral, it's just the way things are. However, the idea that guilt has so paralyzed some people that they must berate others for spending tourist dollars in Haiti is unconscionable.
Staying away from Haiti and taking away what little economic stability tourism brought to the nation isn't the answer. A person can enjoy its beaches and beauty and still donate time and money to its people. There is no moral dilemma here except in some people's small minds.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
- Wholesale inventories rose 1 percent in December
- States, Feds to announce new mortgage settlement
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Forrester 4Q profit doubles but outlook soft
- Doubts cast on "girlfriend adoption" scheme
- US: No leniency for Ill. man in erectile pump case
- Summary Box: Early Greece rally fades; Apple rises
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "American Idol": Jim Carrey's daughter out, and then disaster
on CBS News






